Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bitcoin Magazine

@BitcoinMagazineTelegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,170subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001937077786
TypeChannel
Username@BitcoinMagazineTelegram
DescriptionThe Most Trusted Voice In #Bitcoin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BitcoinMagazineTelegram

Growth

10,17010,18910,179.57 August 2026 — 10,188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,189 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,188 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,181 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,179 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,172 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,170 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,167–10,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:0710,170-2
11 Aug 2026, 17:3210,172-7
10 Aug 2026, 15:5110,179-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:1510,181-7
8 Aug 2026, 14:0510,188-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:3010,189+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:4510,188first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.03%
avg views ÷ 10,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
308
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held46 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total14,152
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,790
Videos
1,230
Links
9,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 36s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC164 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: There's now a 69% chance Bitcoin will be above $65,000 this month, according to Polymarket⁠.com 🚀

12 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC181 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: The number of Bitcoin holders continue to rise, according to Grayscale 🚀 "We believe that adoption will be driven by more demand for scarce assets, greater adoption of blockchain technology, and generational change in portfolio construction." 👏

12 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC215 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: Goldman Sachs acquires NEOS, including $1 billion in their Bitcoin High Income ETFs 🤯

12 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC252 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: Bitcoin is now trading in its "Cost of Production" zone, typically the sign of a bear market bottom. 👀 HODL 🚀

12 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC298 viewsread 13 August 2026

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) #Bitcoin yearly lows: 2012 - $4 2013 - $13 2014 - $300 2015 - $190 2016 - $360 2017 - $780 2018 - $3,200 2019 - $3,400 2020 - $3,800 2021 - $28,700 2022 - $15,700 2023 - $16,600 2024 - $39,400 2025 - $76,300 2026 - $58,500 Zoom out.

12 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC289 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US regulator OCC approves Bitcoin and crypto firms to become national banks. "America and the OCC are once again open for business."

11 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC287 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) NEW: 🇺🇸 ProCap Financial CEO tells FOX "They keep printing money, Bitcoin's gonna keep going up over the long-run" 👀 "All you're betting on is the stupidity of the politicians to keep printing money. I don't know about you, that is a bet i'll take all day long." 🚀

11 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC271 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) NEW: Current Bitcoin supply by custody setup 👇 Self custody (45.6%) Exchanges & custodians (36.1%) Indirect exposure (13.9%) BTC yet to be mined (4.4%)

11 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC259 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) NEW: CNBC says "There's a lot more institutional buy in this time" for Bitcoin 👀 "If you're going by the 4-year cycle of Bitcoin..a bull market will come at the end of this year...there is of course a lot of demand from the institutional side that might help keep it afloat" 🚀

11 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC250 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC to unveil 'major crypto plans' as Clarity Act stalls — Bloomberg 👀

11 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC253 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: 🇺🇸 CFTC 'will proceed with digital asset rulemakings' even if the Clarity Act does not pass, Chairman Selig reportedly said 👀

11 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC274 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Magazine (Twitter/X) JUST IN: Billionaire Tim Draper says: “First they’ll say, 'We accept Bitcoin.' Then they’ll say, 'We only accept Bitcoin.' Then there will be a run on the banks. Then the world as we know it will fundamentally change forever as Bitcoin goes infinite against the US dollar.”

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @BitcoinMagazineTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 536,111 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitcoin Magazine” (@BitcoinMagazineTelegram), 10,170 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinMagazineTelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.