Channel

@lnp2pbot Exchange

@p2plightning

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,451subscribers

-272 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001792339933
Type	Channel
Username	@p2plightning
Description	Intercambios con @lnp2pbot
Created	Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	7
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/p2plightning

Growth

7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -272. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,410–11,764 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 07:42	11,451	-113
11 Aug 2026, 09:37	11,564	-141
10 Aug 2026, 09:47	11,705	-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:05	11,707	-7
8 Aug 2026, 08:51	11,714	-9
7 Aug 2026, 11:25	11,723	no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:47	11,723	first reading

Engagement

290 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 0.535%; avg views ÷ 11,451 subscribers
Avg views / post: 61.3; 290 posts measured
Reaction rate: —; this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window: 290; of 290 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held	290 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total	17,780
Reactions total	—
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	13 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links: 52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC727 viewsread 13 August 2026

⚠️ This bot is no longer in service Thank you for being part of this community. The bot no longer processes orders or payments. 📄 Official announcement: https://x.com/negrunch/status/2086899005355704703 🥜 We invite you to keep trading Bitcoin P2P without KYC using Mostro: If you want to use Mostro: https://mostro.network If you want to run your own Mostro node: https://mostro.community/ 🎥 Video tutorial: https:/…

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC797 viewsread 13 August 2026

⚠️ Este bot ha dejado de prestar servicios Gracias por haber sido parte de esta comunidad. El bot ya no procesa órdenes ni pagos. 📄 Comunicado oficial: https://x.com/negrunch/status/2086896990256799795 🥜 Te invitamos a seguir comerciando Bitcoin de forma P2P y sin KYC con Mostro: Si quieres usar Mostro: https://mostro.network Si quieres correr tu propio nodo Mostro: https://mostro.community/ 🎥 Video tutorial: ht…

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC622 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC431 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC309 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC219 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC206 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC210 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC198 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC190 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC223 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

11 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC159 viewsread 13 August 2026

Signed @lnp2pBot

Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @p2plightning. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,076,912 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

ترجمه‌ی مقاله‌های بیت‌کوین
@bitcoinarticlesfarsi · 2,6821 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Lnp2pbot Colombia
@lnp2pbotcolombia · 1,5911 post OrdenesP2P
@OrdenesP2P · 8321 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@lnp2pbot Exchange” (@p2plightning), 11,451 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p2plightning.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.