Channel
@cryptobilbao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001230568486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptobilbao |
| Description | Noticias del mundo Blockchain y criptomonedas desde la capital |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptobilbao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 45 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 45 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 June 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 78 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
💻Bitcoin permite mucho más que enviar dinero: multifirma, bloqueos temporales y herencia programada. Los datos en cadena muestran que, en julio de 2026, ese uso avanzado representa una fracción mínima de toda la actividad de la red.
🚫 Google Play retiró la app Binance para sus usuarios en la Unión Europea.
🚫 La Unión Europea bloqueó las operaciones de 14 exchanges de criptomonedas vinculados a la movilización de fondos rusos. La medida busca evitar la evasión de sanciones tras la reciente aprobación del marco legal para criptoactivos en Rusia.
🚀 Bitcoin recupera los 65.000 dólares tras pausa en ataques de Estados Unidos a Irán. Cae el precio del petróleo, se reduce el riesgo inflacionario y hay un retorno moderado de stablecoins a exchanges.
🌐 ¿Pueden convivir Bitcoin y la inteligencia militar? EE. UU. suma al Bitcoin Policy Institute, Palantir y Anduril a un programa del Departamento de Estado. Una alianza diplomática que junta la privacidad con la vigilancia masiva.
📉 Poolin, el pool de minería de Bitcoin que años atrás llegó a ser el principal a nivel mundial, se declaró en quiebra.
⚡️ La propuesta BIP-110 no rompería la red Lightning, pero una eventual división de Bitcoin podría hacer que un nodo no vea a tiempo un intento de cierre fraudulento de un canal. Las restricciones sobre Taproot también preocupan por el futuro de LN.
📊 La industria de criptomonedas ya genera 34.000 empleos directos en Estados Unidos y contribuye con más de 55.000 millones de dólares al PIB de 2026, según un informe de la NCA.
📉 El analista español Pablo Gil advierte que el criptoinvierno sigue activo y proyecta una caída de bitcoin a los 35.000 dólares antes de terminar 2026. Según el trader, hay falta de demanda institucional y la IA está absorbiendo liquidez de los mercados.
🤑 La venta de 216 millones de dólares en bitcoin de Strategy desató una guerra de opiniones entre los bitcoiners ¿qué dice la comunidad?
📉 Bitcoin cayó a USD 61.300 por ventas de Strategy, pero subió a casi USD 64.000 luego de que Donald Trump expresara su respaldo al sector. ⚖️ El rebote demuestra el fuerte impacto que las señales políticas de Estados Unidos ejercen sobre la cotización de este activo.
📰 ¿Qué está pasando con el precio de bitcoin? ¿Por qué aumentan los retiros de Binance? ¿Qué debate abrió la reciente venta de Strategy? Estos y otros titulares llegan cada día a tu correo en "Noticias del Día", un boletín con los hechos más relevantes del ecosistema Bitcoin. 📩 Suscríbete GRATIS. #Newsletter
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptobilbao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoBilbao” (@cryptobilbao), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptobilbao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.