🇷🇺 Цифровой рубль (CBDC) может стоить банкам ₽100 млрд комиссий в год Внедрение цифрового рубля может привести к потере более 100 млрд рублей комиссионных доходов банков ежегодно, пишет «Коммерсантъ» со ссылкой на исследование НРА. Основной удар придется по эквайрингу: часть платежей уйдет с карт на платформу Банка России. По оценке НРА, такие потери возможны, если цифровой рубль займет около 14% безналичных расчет…

Channel
Risky Ventures hub
@RiskSeeker
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,787subscribers
-2,343 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002125783544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RiskSeeker |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RiskSeeker |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 19,787 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:55 | 19,809 | -66 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 19,875 | -37 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 19,912 | -45 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 19,957 | -26 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 19,983 | -46 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 20,029 | -45 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 20,074 | -81 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 20,155 | -62 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 20,217 | -62 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 20,279 | -168 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 20,447 | -177 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 20,624 | -262 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 20,886 | -318 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 21,204 | -51 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 21,255 | -50 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 21,305 | -74 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 21,379 | -87 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 21,466 | -136 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 21,602 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 36s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 26 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 73.0% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔥 На Tether подали в суд за блокировку USDT на $42,4 млн Два тайских бизнесмена подали иск в федеральный суд США против Tether, заявляя, что эмитент USDT незаконно заморозил их средства, а также внес их кошельки в «черный список» в октябре 2025 года на основании неформального запроса правоохранительных органов. В список вошли 10 адресов в сети Ethereum c общим балансом чуть больше $42 миллионов. При этом, официальн…
Я календарь ?
🤣1
🔨🇷🇺 В РФ Челябинский гарнизонный военный суд оштрафовал военнослужащего на ₽100 тыс (~$1,2 тыс) за передачу двух банковских карт человеку, занимавшемуся обналичиванием средств от деятельности нелегальных iGaming-операторов 🔍 По данным суда, фигурант получил вознаграждение в размере ₽10 тыс за передачу банковских карт с полным доступом к личным кабинетам для последующего проведения через них операций по уходу от нало…
🎉1
В России готовят масштабную легализацию криптообменников В Москве прошел съезд участников рынка, на котором создали Ассоциацию организаций по обмену цифровой валюты. В будущем эта структура рассчитывает получить статус саморегулируемой организации и управлять работой криптообменников по правилам Центробанка. С 1 сентября вступил в силу закон № 282-ФЗ. Теперь компании с оборотом от 3,5 млн рублей в месяц должны имет…
❤2
А чего там с тоном? Наблюдаете еще за проектами? Были заработки?
- Да, чутка заработали57%
- Нет, все умерло57%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❌ Россия🇷🇺: легальный крипторынок может стать «рынком крашенной крипты» Мысль не нова, и Кочетков из “Финама” не первый, кто её озвучивает… Но нам с этим как-то надо жить, и чёткое понимание специфики — что-то вроде спасательного круга. 🔤 Напомним, что “мечеными” или “крашеными” становятся цифровые активы, которые прошли через адреса или площадки, попавшие под международные санкции. ❌Для иностранных контрагенто…
Российская экономика похожа на верблюда из-за её «выживаемости в экстремальных условиях» — советник главы ЦБ Тремасов.
➡️ Telegram закладывает основу для массового криптоперехода Павел Дуров объявил о начале запуска некастодиального криптокошелька Gram Wallet прямо внутри Telegram. Сейчас функция доступна тестовой группе пользователей, но в ближайшие недели её раскатают на всю аудиторию — а это более 1 миллиарда человек. 🟢 Главная фишка Gram Wallet — он некастодиальный. Это значит, что приватные ключи хранятся только у пользовате…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👀1🤣1
1 сентября двадцать два системно значимых банка – Сбер, Альфа, Т-Банк и другие обязаны открывать кошельки для размещения цифрового рубля всем желающим Торговые компании с выручкой от 120 млн рублей обязаны принимать по нему оплату. Всё серьезно, по-государственному. Одна деталь: счет в цифровых рублях открывается через банковское приложение. А приложения российских банков из App Store удалены. Обновления и новые ве…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @RiskSeeker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А чего там с тоном? Наблюдаете еще за проектами? Были заработки?
- Да, чутка заработали57%
- Нет, все умерло57%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@LifeTheCrypto · 66,123#1
@bitochekvko · 40,965#2
@crypto_okop · 139,327#3
@investkingyru · 1,621,058#4
@zicelaqo · 160,852#5
@tonkorova · 32,401#6
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,060,303#7
@eduardinvest · 1,282,059#8
@tapovich_gram · 14,434 (as read 24 September 2026)#9
@eeusd · 1,086,854#10
@walt_news_cis · 1,097,544#11
@SatoshiNakamoTON · 51,744#12
@givemetonru · 1,947,244#13
@hodl_fuck · 100,115#14
@tgbtc · 245,556#15
@mem_notcoin · 80,959#16
@flipperfox · 4,209#17
@rouziicrypto · 438,969#18
@vestirussia · 933,141#19
@ton2k · 228,751#20
@TonNewbie · 198,931#21
@notatraderrr · 134,957#22
@tonbase · 1,439,927#23
@barboskich_ton · 16,493#24
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,065,143#25
@DeCenter · 1,699,497#26
@notcoin_russia_ruchanal · 22,282#27
@twotons · 3,966#28
@Kitonomika · 426,212#29
@this_is_TON · 36,304#30
@toncryptans · 221,764#31
@full_metal_jetton · 41,832#32
@homyak_s_tona · 22,860#33
@tons_base · 462,941#34
@crypto_jeman · 635,925#35
@notforfans · 137,886#36
@cryptomedwed · 137,409#37
@fattonyton · 1,532#38
@playweb4 · 139,228#39
@ton_events · 63,708#40
@ton_raketa777 · 3,316#41
@toncishub · 30,149#42
@OpenLeag · 5,598#43
@notyou · 45,083#44
@BrokeinCrpt · 91,450#45
@club10k · 8,978#46
@TonKrypTON · 9,266#47
@thoughtsroma · 14,794#48
@tonscam_exposed · 1,047#49
@TONPOINTER · 120,657#50
@ton_unity_news · 6,659#51
@ton1moon · 285,295#52
@ontonbaton · 44,686#53
@getgemsrus · 106,615#54
@wortyton · 34,869#55
@tu_airdrops_daily · 62,201#56
@mr_tony · 266,223#57
@flyhighdn · 686#58
@TonRaiders · 1,790#59
@invest_zonaa · 870,897#60
@lostdogscoru · 210,898#61
@anon_club · 338,984#62
@aquaprotocolxyzchannel · 419,960#63
@iloveton2 · 17,970#64
@cryptovtr · 10,323#65
@what_now_Ptah · 5,384#66
@primedandgeeked · 2,306#67
@pocketfi · 1,696,345#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ruton · 124,847
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
@Crypto_newswallet · 41,540
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
@starstonchain · 87,535
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
@delo_vton · 45,058
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
@homyak_s_tona · 22,860
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
@picardia_ecosystem · 322,646
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Risky Ventures hub” (@RiskSeeker), 19,787 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RiskSeeker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.