These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
92.2 average views per post against 21,830 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.422%. Across the 25,166 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.70% and 23.0%, with a median of 11.7%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Posts measured
26 of 26 published in the window (26 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
2,397
Mature posts only
0.422% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 31 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -331. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,749–22,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 13:24
21,799
-31
30 Aug 2026, 16:55
21,830
-54
29 Aug 2026, 13:28
21,884
-33
28 Aug 2026, 13:43
21,917
-30
27 Aug 2026, 16:15
21,947
-22
26 Aug 2026, 15:27
21,969
-34
25 Aug 2026, 17:22
22,003
-31
24 Aug 2026, 17:47
22,034
-35
23 Aug 2026, 02:36
22,069
-61
21 Aug 2026, 19:53
22,130
no change
21 Aug 2026, 19:45
22,130
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.423%
avg views ÷ 21,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.2
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
27 (29 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
2,397
Reactions total
28
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
79.3%
👀
3
10.3%
🌚
1
3.45%
💯
1
3.45%
🤔
1
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В РФ раскрыли схему на 100 млн рублей с фальшивыми купюрами в банкоматах
Сотрудники МВД задержали группу из восьми человек, которые скормили банкоматам по всей стране поддельные деньги. Общий ущерб банкам превысил 100 миллионов рублей.
Организатор печатал в своей московской квартире подделки, похожие на пятитысячные купюры. Затем сувенирные банкноты передавали сообщникам в регионах.
Подельники вносили фальшивки че…
Процессерам на заметку
На днях прокуратура Москвы сообщила, что направила более 570 исков к владельцам счетов, через которые проходили похищенные у граждан деньги.
Общая сумма требований – свыше 370 млн рублей:
Столичные прокуроры направили более 570 исков о взыскании неосновательного обогащения с владельцев банковских счетов, на которые потерпевшие переводили деньги под влиянием мошенников, сообщили РАПСИ в пресс-с…
Оператор 1win сообщил в своём профиле Instagram о внедрении на продукт новой функции пополнения баланса через прямое подключение Web3-кошельков. По данным оператора, пользователю достаточно один раз привязать кошелёк в разделе пополнения, чтобы в дальнейшем подтверждать депозиты в приложении кошелька, без ручного копирования криптовалютного адреса
🔍 По заявлению 1win, игрокам доступно подключение кошельков MetaMask …
Черный август для российских криптообменников: силовики усилили давление на серый рынок, проведя серию рейдов и задержаний.
• В начале августа обыски прошли в Donald-Capital и еще восьми обменниках в Москва-Сити. Следствие связывает их с отмыванием денег, полученных через колл-центры хохлов. Были задержаны около 20 сотрудников.
• Через неделю силовики пришли на Горбушку, где из одного обменника изъяли около 10 мл…
В РФ запустят реестр самозапрета на азартные игры
С 1 сентября 2026 года вступает в силу закон, который позволит гражданам добровольно ограничить себе доступ к легальным азартным играм. Подать заявление в Единый регулятор азартных игр можно будет через Госуслуги или в МФЦ.
Заявление активируется через 12 часов после подачи, а минимальный срок самозапрета составляет один год. Досрочно отозвать его нельзя. Снять огра…
Bybit начал удалять комментарии в P2P-стакане
Отзывы о контрагентах исчезают. В новых правилах Bybit указано, что площадка может вручную удалять комментарии, если они не соответствуют поставленной оценке или нарушают требования платформы.
чуть объясним как мы это понимаем
Отзывы в P2P — один из ключевых способов проверить контрагента перед сделкой. Если негативные комментарии пропадают, привычной оценки и процента…
🔥 В Сирии появятся PSP, EMI, PSO и их регулирование
После снятия санкций и запуска в стране виза и мастеркард, Центральный Банк решил пойти еще дальше и утвердил новую государственную систему электронных платежей и денежных переводов. В стране создадут фреймворк под PSP (payment service providers), EMI (electronic money institutions) и PSO (операторы платежных систем).
Это фактически создание с нуля регуляторной ба…
🔍🇰🇿 В Казахстане прокуратура Алматинской области выявила систематическое участие в онлайн-гемблинге 20 частных судебных исполнителей, пополнивших за неуказанный период игровые счета у оператора Olimpbet на общую сумму ~$383 тыс. По данным прокуратуры, один из исполнителей за три года перечислил на игровой аккаунт ~$296 тыс, другой ~$55,3 тыс
💬 В ведомстве заявили, что участие лиц с публично значимыми функциями в аза…
☄️ Новая массовая схема скама в белых треугольниках
В последнее время в сфере белых треугольников на закрытых платформах набирает обороты новая схема скама, от которой нет защиты. Потери трейдеров уже большие, но ситуация может стать очень критичной.
Суть схемы:
• Мошенник покупает карту Сбербанка, а также карту любого другого банка;
• Далее он заходит в сделку к белому треугольщику на закрытой бирже, например, на…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @RiskSeeker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Русский TON @ruton · 130,387 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
Crypto Vampire @Crypto_Vampir · 43,882 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
CLT_News @starstonchain · 96,539 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
Дело в TON @delo_vton · 49,380 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Технологии и ChatGPT @picardia_ecosystem · 370,806 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Risky Ventures hub” (@RiskSeeker), 21,799 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RiskSeeker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
