Channel
@FragmentsCommunity
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
959subscribers
-1,051 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002285164455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FragmentsCommunity |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FragmentsCommunity |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 959 | -53 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 1,012 | -84 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 1,096 | -33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 1,129 | -57 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 1,186 | -79 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 1,265 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 1,295 | -37 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1,332 | -54 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,386 | -122 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 1,508 | -214 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 1,722 | -170 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,892 | -119 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 2,011 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 2,010 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
💎 Fragment 1% Daily Brief | August 6, 2026 📊 Telegram & Gram Market Pulse (Last 24h): ▫️ Gram: Fluctuated in the [$1.38 - $1.41] range ▫️ Collectible Numbers (+888): Yesterday 2116 Gram ⬅️ Today 2045 Gram 🔻 ▫️ Market Sentiment: Correction in collectibles / Bullish anticipation for new listing 📌 Yesterday's Top Headlines You Shouldn't Miss: 🔹 New Improvements for 🎁 FinePen Revealed Recent upgrades have been rolled o…
This channel and @iFragmentbot are sponsored by: 🤑 @club10k — club10k.ton Special thanks to all of you! — @iamseyyed 💎
Summary & Daily Challenge 🚀 Given corporate lawsuits and Telegram's sudden handle releases, which Unavailable username do you think will be the next to enter Fragment auctions? Share your analysis and predictions in @FragmentInvestors!
Business and investment handles in the pipeline 📈 In the list of 1,000 locked Unavailable handles, major commercial terms stand out: @invest | @demand | @origin | @leader | @method
The Trademark challenge in the crypto market 🏢 This clash proves that handle ownership on Telegram is a multi-million-dollar arena. Telegram keeps a portion reserved to prevent legal disputes, but late-arriving corporations end up paying whales fortunes to secure their identity!
How locked handles impact market value 💎 The locking of high-value handles or their acquisition by big brands makes clean single-word handles scarcer, driving up the overall value of remaining rare market handles.
Other corporations making official Fragment purchases 🛍 Major brands like @uralairlines, @goldapple, and @mash also acquired their official handles directly on Fragment and linked them to their channels.
Major brands buying on Fragment: The case of T-Bank 💳 Not all companies sue—many pay big money! After rebranding to T-Bank, Tinkoff Bank bought @tbank on Fragment for 20,000 Gram ( gram 8$ ) ! The reseller made a profit of around $150,000.
The scale of the @dodopizza case ⚖️ This handle was originally purchased in 2022 for 1,865 $TON. The owner refused to sell the channel and handle for under $300,000 (and at times rejected even higher offers). On top of this, they also turned down Sberbank's $200,000 offer for the @gigachat handle! Anticipating that such heavy legal pressure from major corporate brands would inevitably arise, Telegram took a proact…
Brands vs. Telegram: The Dodo Pizza Lawsuit a few year ago🍕 Dodo Pizza filed a lawsuit against Telegram over losing its official channel name (@dodopizza), the owner of this username is @elector. The company's lawyer stated that Telegram created an unfair competitive environment and profited from the process.
@elector's legendary portfolio features heavy hitters (with purchase prices): @apple (33k $TON) | @hyundai (10.5k $TON) | @china (10.5k $TON) | @baby (8,798 $TON) | @tonfoundation | @foxnews | @aljazeera In 2.5 years, he has only ever sold two handles: @maestro for 80k $TON and @dodopizza for $500k!
A quick look at Fragment whales: @elector 🐋 Besides Telegram's official wallets, one of the oldest buyers on Fragment is user @elector. Holding over 1,400 usernames (including heavy hitters like @apple for 33k $TON), his refusal to sell cheap has always drawn market attention.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FragmentsCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FragmentsCommunity named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fragment Community 🏴☠️” (@FragmentsCommunity), 959 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FragmentsCommunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.