Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DRIFT Foundation

@ton_drift

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

46,227subscribers

-314 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050934559
TypeChannel
Username@ton_drift
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ton_drift

Growth

46,22746,54146,3847 August 2026 — 46,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,528 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,452 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,401 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,376 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,315 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,227 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -314. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,180–46,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5446,227-88
11 Aug 2026, 18:0346,315-61
10 Aug 2026, 19:1746,376-25
9 Aug 2026, 21:3146,401-51
8 Aug 2026, 20:5446,452-76
7 Aug 2026, 18:3846,528-13
7 Aug 2026, 06:4646,541first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

453 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19041.9%
🐳8819.4%
🤔5512.1%
😘429.27%
❤‍🔥337.28%
🤡163.53%
😡91.99%
🗿71.55%
🍾40.883%
🤩30.662%
🫡30.662%
🕊20.442%
🆒10.221%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 453reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ton_drift. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 October 2024 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 11:52 UTC567 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚀 Bug Bounty is Open! Help us test the project before launch and make it as stable as possible. Found a bug? Post a report using the template below: Title: Description: Steps to Reproduce: Expected Result: Actual Result: Screenshots/Videos: 🏆 Active testers and users who report valuable bugs will be rewarded after the successful launch of the project. Every report helps us improve the product. Thank you for bein

26 May 2026, 18:03 UTC459 viewsread 12 August 2026

@driftdicebot Hey! I'm playing this emoji dice bot in Telegram — dice, darts, slots. Join via my link, you'll get a starter bonus. https://t.me/?start=ref_5108221864 Lets do DRIFT Great again 😎

24 May 2026, 07:44 UTC504 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

What language do you use to communicate?

❤‍🔥1

24 May 2026, 07:36 UTC530 viewsread 12 August 2026

Find bugs and earn 50000 $DRIFT Play more and earn 500 000 $DRIFT https://t.me/+YGD1L_i5qwNhMDQ1

18 May 2026, 07:56 UTC709 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚀 We’ve launched a new bot — and it’s now in testing! Join our chat, become a tester, and help us find bugs. As a reward, you’ll receive FREE coins for every issue you discover 💰 Don’t miss your chance to be part of the early access squad — jump in now! https://t.me/+YGD1L_i5qwNhMDQ1

👍2

3 Feb 2025, 17:35 UTC≈12,600 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

If you want to buy $DRIFT as favorably as possible, use swap.coffee ☕️ DRIFT on the moon this year)

👍17🤡3❤‍🔥1🐳1

23 Jan 2025, 19:16 UTC≈11,800 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Old cheque for old fans 😐

😡9👍6🫡3🐳1

11 Jan 2025, 13:41 UTC≈11,700 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Golden Ashes: A Tribute to Los Angeles 🔥 In light of the tragic events unfolding in Los Angeles, we are releasing a commemorative NFT. A once-legendary city, a dream for millions, now turns to ashes. The devastation is heartbreaking, and our deepest condolences go out to all those affected. This NFT captures the fragile beauty of this moment—a symbol of resilience amidst ruin. Anyone can own this piece of history

👍6🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ton_drift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,481 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DRIFT Foundation” (@ton_drift), 46,227 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ton_drift.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.