Channel
@UltraVips
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,157subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001858090836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @UltraVips @vipnumber |
| Created | 1 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UltraVips |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 5,157 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 5,161 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 5,169 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 5,174 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 5,176 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 5,178 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 May 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
150 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 86 | 57.3% | |
| 🏆 | 64 | 42.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2023 to 2 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UltraVips. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 May 2023 to 2 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
TON DNS Summer (Part 2) Part 1 is here. Why is this post on the channel about numbers included in the monthly column? 1. Both Collectible Numbers and numeric domains consist solely of digits. These domains have the potential to become luxury assets, as Collectible Numbers already are. 2. Both 4N domains and Collectible Numbers have their own masks and subcollections, which facilitates easy pricing and marketmakin…
🏆8
TON DNS Summer (Part 1) As we predicted, the hype around TON DNS has begun. The hype began with Four-Digit domains (hereinafter referred to as 4N domains). People are "burning" their 100 TON on the TON DNS smart contract and transferring this value to NFTs (similar to Banksy's work). On February 13, the last domain from the Club 100 (0074.ton), was minted, on February 17, the thousandth domain (5755.ton), and on Fe…
🏆7
@club10k
🏆3🤔3
to be continued...
🤔25🏆1
1️⃣1️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 LONG 11-digits NUMBERS: ⭐️5. RANDOM 11-digits: VIEW ALL CATEGORYS
🤔20🏆11
1️⃣1️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 LONG 11-digits NUMBERS: ⭐️4. REGULAR 11-digits: VIEW ALL CATEGORYS
🤔16🏆1
1️⃣1️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 LONG 11-digits NUMBERS: ⭐️3. BEAUTIFUL 11-digits: VIEW ALL CATEGORYS
🤔9🏆2
1️⃣1️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 LONG 11-digits NUMBERS: ⭐️2. VIP 11-digits Tier 1 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: PATTERNS: ⚫️+888 same digits 0 or 8 [example: +888 0880 8888] ✔️Total numbers: PATTERNS: ⚫️+888 000X XXXX [example: +888 0007 7777] where X - same digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 or 9 ⚫️+888 0XXX 0XXX [example: +888 0777 0777] ⚫️+888 0XXX XXX0 [example: +888 0777 7770] ⚫️+888 0X0X 0X0X [example: +888 0707 0707] …
🏆7
1️⃣1️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 LONG 11-digits NUMBERS ⭐️1. ULTRA VIP 11-digits Tier 1 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: 🟠+888 0000 0000 🟠+888 1111 1111 🟠+888 2222 2222 🟠+888 0XXX XXXX [example: +888 0888 8888] where X - same digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 or 9 ✔️Total number in Tier 1: 12 Tier 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: 🟠+888 0888 0888 🟠+888 0088 0088 🟠+888 0008 0008 🟠+888 0080 0080 🟠+888 0800 0800 🟠+888 0808 0808 🟠+888 0880 0880 🟠+888 0888 8880 …
🤔2
7️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 SHORT 7-digits NUMBERS [+888 8 ***] ⭐️4. REGULAR 7-digits: The remaining numbers VIEW ALL CATEGORYS
🤔1
7️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 SHORT 7-digits NUMBERS [+888 8 ***] ⭐️3. BEAUTIFUL 7-digits: +888 8 XYX [example: +888 8 121] +888 8 YXX [example: +888 8 211] +888 8 XXY [example: +888 8 112] where X - same digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 or 9 where Y - same digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 or 9 VIEW ALL CATEGORYS
7️⃣📏🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ⭐️VIP CATEGORY 7-digits NUMBERS [+888 8 ***] ➡️VIP Tier 1 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: PATTERNS: ⚫️+888 8 X8X [example: +888 8 181] ⚫️+888 8 8XX [example: +888 8 811] ⚫️+888 8 XX8 [example: +888 8 118] where X - same digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 or 9 ✔️Total number in Tier 1: ✅24 --------------------------------------- ➡️VIP Tier 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: PATTERNS: ⚫️ +888 8 123 and the rest of the sequences ⚫️+888 8 00X [example:…
🏆6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @UltraVips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 478,012 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“+888 ULTRA VIP numbers” (@UltraVips), 5,157 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltraVips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.