Channel
@chehel_salegi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,766subscribers
-909 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001013690292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chehel_salegi |
| Description | بفرمایید چن جرعه عشق و آرامش! کانالی برای رسیدن به خودمون جایی برای شنیدن حرف دل، عاشقانه هایی که بر دل آویزونن کپی با ذکر منبع،نوش جان @ghasemhalajian @safar_chehelsalegi کانال سفرنامه های من https://instagram.com/ghasem_hallajian?igshid=YmMyMTA |
| Created | 14 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chehel_salegi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:46 | 30,766 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:01 | 30,770 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:40 | 30,781 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:17 | 30,790 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:20 | 30,797 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:30 | 30,800 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 30,806 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 30,808 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 30,820 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 30,830 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 30,836 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:45 | 30,850 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 30,860 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:55 | 30,878 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 30,887 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 30,894 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 30,908 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 30,918 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 30,922 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 30,927 | first reading |
232 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 232 (30 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 199,785 |
| Reactions total | 4,957 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 22:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16,470 reactions across 226 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,744 | 40.9% | |
| 👏 | 2,787 | 16.9% | |
| 👍 | 2,002 | 12.2% | |
| 💔 | 1,994 | 12.1% | |
| 😢 | 785 | 4.77% | |
| 😭 | 579 | 3.52% | |
| 🕊 | 281 | 1.71% | |
| 😁 | 271 | 1.65% | |
| 👌 | 205 | 1.24% | |
| 🙏 | 182 | 1.11% | |
| 👎 | 175 | 1.06% | |
| 💋 | 132 | 0.801% | |
| 🤔 | 126 | 0.765% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 0.583% | |
| 😡 | 70 | 0.425% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 0.152% | |
| 🤷 | 12 | 0.073% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.018% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.006% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,035 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 51 of 72 posts held from the last 30 days (70.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💬از « درد » های بزرگسالی ! دوازده یا سیزده ساله بودم. قد کشیده بودم درحالیکه صورتم هنوز در هوای کودکیها مانده بود. خجالتی و بی اعتماد به نفس بودم. در راه مدرسه، هر روز، یک پسر جوان خیلی قدبلندی، حدود بیست ساله، مزاحمم میشد. از پیاده رو با سرعت میآمد مقابلم که داشتم تند تند با سر پایین و کوله به پشت رد میشدم، زیر پلکم بشکن میزد و با خنده داد میکشید: کجااااااا؟!! دوستانش قهقهه میزدند. مرا میدید، از آن بالا دستانش را…
😭43❤21👏8💔5
من هم چهل ساله شدم ! سلام به دوستای خوب کانال خوبتر چهلسالگی! میخواستم بگم، بعد از چند سال که عضو خانوادتونم امروز منم چهل ساله شدم و بهتر و بیشتر میتونم حال و هواتونو بفهمم. میخواستم بگ،م امروز دیگه غصه اضافه وزنمو نمیخورم. میخواستم بگم، امروز دیگه حرفای دیگران دیگه فقط حرفای دیگرانه. می خواستم بگم، امروز من، منی که چهل سال باهام راه اومده، ساخته و سوخته رو بغل کردم و بوسیدم. دست در گردن هم با هم راه رفتیم و ترانه…
❤33👏20💋5🙏2👍1🤔1
💬پیامک صبح شمبه(۵۰۷) بیا به غار برگردیم! به بدویترین بوسهها که بوی عقدنامه و مهریه نمیدادند تا عریانی ؛ زننده بحساب نیاید و زیباترین هدیهی جهان آتشی باشد که یک روز را صرف روشن کردنش کنم برای تو... یغما گلروی🍏 🆔 @chehel_salegi ............................................. الهـی آمیـن به دعـاهایِ پنهون توی دلهامون🙏 ارادتمند: حلاجیان 🍏
❤27💋6👍4🤔4🕊3👏2👎1
💬اگه همسرم بفهمه ! در این مدت با زنانی آشنا شدهام که شعر میگویند؛ زنانی با کانالهای کوچک، بیستوچند عضو، و جهانهایی بزرگ که از ژرفای زن بودنشان مینویسند. زنانی که کلمات را نه برای شهرت، نه برای دیدهشدن، که برای تاب آوردنِ خویشتن به رشتهی واژه میکشند. تلاششان را دوست دارم؛ این سماجت آرام را که در خلوت، چراغی روشن نگه میدارند. به یکی از آنها گفتم: چرا کانالت را گسترش نمیدهی؟ بگذار دیگران هم سهمی از این همه …
❤42💔19👏12👍6😭5
💬کوتاهترین پیام برای درک حس ناب چهلسالگی! گاهی زیباترین اتفاق زندگی، رسیدن به روزیه که دیگه برای هیچچیز عجله نداری و با تمام وجودت آرامشی رو احساس میکنی که از درونت میجوشه! نویسنده:؟ 🍏 🆔 @chehel_salegi .................................................. من رو یاد « جنب و جوش » بچه گربه ها میندازه که به هر دری میزنن برای شناخت اطراف شون .... مادرشون اما خیلی آرام ؛ نشسته در گوشه ای و بهشون میخنده !!! رسیدن به حس …
❤29🕊6👏4👎3🤔3👌2😢2👍1
💬چرا مرگ خودمون رو باور نداریم ؟ چه اتفاقی میافته که براحتی بعد از پرواز یکی از نزدیکانمون؛ به زندگی بدون مرگ خودمون ؛ برمیگردیم ؟ 🆔 @chehel_salegi
👍21👏9❤3👌3💔3
در مورد بیمار آلزایمری نوشته بود:دکترش گفته:«او غم هایش را فراموش میکند، اما حسی که موقع غم داشته را نَه!» بیش از پنج بار میخوانم جمله را و فکر میکنم این فقط در مورد آلزایمر و حس غم نیست! ما آدمها، آدمها را فراموش میکنیم اما حسی که در ما بوجود آوردهاند را نه؛ دوست داشتنشان را نه... و ای کاش حسی که از آدم بماند، مهربانی باشد🍏 #محبوبه_احمدی(@m_ahmadib) 🆔 @chehel_salegi
💔41❤24😢7👏5
💬وقتی خودت ؛ خودت رو دست کم میگیری ! عبدالرحمن محمد السید، پزشک و سیاستمدار آمریکایی مصریتبار، با پیروزی در انتخابات میشیگان به یکی از چهرههای خبرساز سیاست آمریکا تبدیل شد؛ چهرهای که مسیر زندگیاش خود روایتی از تغییر مرزهای هویت و مشارکت سیاسی در آمریکاست. السید در سال ۲۰۰۷، دانشجوی ممتاز دانشگاه میشیگان بود و در مراسم فارغالتحصیلی این دانشگاه سخنرانی کرد. بیل کلینتون، رئیسجمهور وقت پیشین آمریکا و سخنران اصلی …
❤16👏14😡6🤷3👎2
💬دل دایی محمد از جوانی پیش عمه سیما بود ! مادربزرگ میگفت دایی محمد هیچ وقت زندگی نکرد . نه اینکه زن و بچه نداشته باشد ، سرکار نرود ، پول درنیاورد ، آبرو نداشته باشد ، مردی نباشد برای خودش ، نه ؛ اتفاقا زن خوبی هم داشت - ماه منیر- دو تا دختر هم داشت که هر دو پزشکی قبول شده بودند دانشگاه شیراز و اصفهان . بازنشسته اداره فرهنگ بود و با خط خوبی دیوان حافظ را باز نویسی کرده بود. قرآن هم می خواند با صدای محزون و گیرایی. ا…
💔77❤22😭14🔥3👍2😢1
💬سی سالگی ببعد .... ! من زیادی جمعگریزم یا آنها زیادی خوشحال و درتکاپو؟....این را وقتهای زیادی بهخصوص توی این ترم از خودم زیاد میپرسم. همکلاسیها تا من را دیدند، گفتند جلسه قبل جایم توی جشن هالووین خالی بود. جشن گرفته بودند. اصلا توی گروه مشترک نوشته بودند که همگی با کاستوم بیایند و خوراکی بامزه همراهشان باشند. من مریض شدم و نرفتم. مریض هم نمیشدم نمیرفتم. این جلسه هم تولد یکی از همکلاسیها بود. دخترهای ف…
❤35👍16👏5🤝1
💬میخوام به آرامش برسم! ساعتی میزان آنی، ساعتی موزون این بعد از این میزان خود شو، تا شوی موزون خویش! نقطهی عطف یک *انسان خردمند* زمانی فرا میرسد که دست از وزنکردن خود روی ترازوی دیگران برمیدارد. تنها زمانی که دست از راضی نگهداشتن همگان برداریم، به عمیقترین سطح از رضایتمندی خواهیم رسید. انسانهای بزرگ، انعکاس صدای دیگران نیستن؛ اونها صدای اصیل خودشون رو دارن👏👏🍏
👍23❤17👌5🕊5
💬وسوسهی زندگی دو چیز مرا وادار به بیرون زدن از خانه میکند: اغواگری بهار و لوندی پاییز. بهار و برگهای تازه جوانه زده، زمین و سبزهای روشن و درخشان و شکوفههای صورتی، پاییز و این سرمای مطبوع لذیذ، این همهمه پرندهها، این تلاطم ابرها، این بازیگوشی باد و باران و آفتاب، منِ خانگی را هم به خیابان میکشاند. به تماشا. امروز پنجمین روز پیادهروی است؛ بیمسیر مشخص، بیزمانبندی خاص، بیشمارش قدمها و بیهمپا. میزنم به …
❤58👏19👍4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @chehel_salegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@chehel_salegi edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @chehel_salegi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chehel_salegi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرامش (چهلسالگي)...” (@chehel_salegi), 30,766 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chehel_salegi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.