Channel
@walbicom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
69,673subscribers
-5,671 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001851834283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @walbicom |
| Description | 🤖 Delegate your trading routine. Digitize your strategy or choose a ready-made one. No code, instant execution. Smarter than bots, colder then copytrading 🚀 🔗 linktr.ee/walbi Collaboration: @WalbiSupport. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/walbicom |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:31 | 69,673 | -106 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 69,779 | -51 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 69,830 | -82 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:30 | 69,912 | -144 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 70,056 | -274 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 70,330 | -374 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 15:42 | 70,704 | -672 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 71,376 | -503 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 71,879 | -174 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 72,053 | -138 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 72,191 | -106 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 72,297 | -112 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 72,409 | -216 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 72,625 | -250 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 72,875 | -197 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 73,072 | -79 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:33 | 73,151 | -63 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 73,214 | -97 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 73,311 | -128 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 73,439 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (14 May 2026 – 16 October 2026) |
| Views total | 9,989 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Oct 2026, 17:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
326 reactions across 35 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 108 | 33.1% | |
| ❤ | 79 | 24.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 36 | 11.0% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 7.98% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 7.98% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 4.60% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 3.07% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 2.76% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.45% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.23% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.92% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.613% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Whale sentiment is now on the chart 🐋 You can finally see how the big players are leaning without ever leaving the chart. Whale sentiment tracks the biggest players on each market over a rolling 5-minute window and shows the balance between longs and shorts in real time. What counts as a large position isn't fixed: the thresholds scale to each instrument's liquidity, so the reading means the same thing whether you'…
🔥4
Service levels are here: Basic and VIP ⚡ We've introduced two service levels on Walbi, and the higher you climb, the less you pay to trade. VIP gives you the best trading conditions on Walbi, with lower trading fees than Basic across a wide range of assets. There are two ways to reach it: • $200K in 30-day trading volume + $10K net deposit • or $30K net deposit Basic is the standard entry level, and trading more i…
❤🔥2❤1
How an agent on Walbi actually works. No magic involved. You describe your strategy in plain words, the way you would explain it to a friend. No code. We turn that into a working agent. Before any real money is involved, you run it on a $10,000 demo across every market, so you can watch how it behaves. When you are ready, it goes live and works around the clock, following your rule at 3am exactly the way it does at…
❤1
Trader's dictionary: liquidation. It's when the exchange force-closes your leveraged trade because your margin, the money you put up as collateral, has run out. At that point the decision isn't yours anymore. The market closes the position for you, and there's nothing left to argue with. The bigger the leverage, the faster it happens. The whole trick is setting your risk before the trade, not in the middle of the p…
❤1🤩1
This week's economic calendar. We start on Tuesday. Monday was a quiet US holiday with nothing worth your attention, so we kick the week off today. Here is what actually matters. Wednesday is the big one. The US releases its September inflation report, called CPI (in plain terms, how fast prices are rising). Right now this is the number markets care about most, because it shapes what the US central bank does with i…
Today we're burying manual trading. Here is how the old way actually goes. You set a stop loss, then move it at 3am because the candle "just needs room". You close a decent trade out of boredom and watch it run without you. And every time you promise yourself that this is the one where you finally catch the reversal. None of that is a plan. It's your mood in the moment, wearing the costume of a decision. An agent …
👍4❤🔥2❤1🤗1
Trader's dictionary: "higher high" You'll see this phrase everywhere right now, usually from someone announcing the bull market is back. Here's what it actually means. A higher high is simply price reaching a peak above the previous peak. That's the whole definition. Why traders care: markets move in waves, not straight lines. When each wave peaks higher than the last, and each dip also bottoms higher than the las…
❤2
It's October. In crypto, that word carries baggage. Traders call it "Uptober" because October has historically been bitcoin's strongest month. It's one of the oldest seasonal patterns in this market, and right now it's most of what the timeline wants to talk about. October has closed green in 10 of the last 13 years, with an average gain of roughly 20% over the past decade. Here's the part that usually gets left o…
🤗2
A new quarter starts this week. Here's what to watch. Three things line up that tend to move crypto, and none of them are complicated once you drop the jargon. Bitcoin just closed its strongest week in eight months. That's the backdrop everything else lands on. What's coming: 👉 Wednesday the quarter closes. Big funds tidy up their books before the deadline, which can push prices around for a day. It usually means …
❤3👌2
This week could get bumpy. Here's why, in plain terms. A few things line up this week that tend to move crypto around. None of them are complicated once you drop the jargon. When big events land close together, prices swing harder. That's not a reason to panic. It's a reason to have a plan. Here's what's happening: 👉 The US central bank (the people who set interest rates) has a lot of officials speaking. Traders l…
👍7
FOMC day: what actually happens at 2pm ET 👇 Once every six weeks the Fed sets the price of money. Today is that day — and it sets the tone for every market, crypto included. Three things land at once: the rate decision (hold or move), the "dot plot" (each official's rate forecast), and the press conference. The dots and the tone often matter more than the number itself. For crypto the logic is simple: rates are th…
👍5❤3👌1
The week ahead — it all runs into Wednesday 👇 This week has one event that actually matters: the Fed's rate decision on Wednesday. Everything before it is noise, everything after is reaction. On Wednesday the Fed announces whether it holds rates or moves them, and releases the "dot plot" — each official's own forecast for where rates go next. That forecast usually shakes markets harder than the decision itself. Wh…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @walbicom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Walbi | Your AI crypto agents” (@walbicom), 69,673 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/walbicom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.