11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +687. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90,375–91,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 17:52
91,355
-12
15 Aug 2026, 00:12
91,367
+863
13 Aug 2026, 13:35
90,504
-35
12 Aug 2026, 11:57
90,539
-27
11 Aug 2026, 13:12
90,566
-62
10 Aug 2026, 12:54
90,628
-20
9 Aug 2026, 12:01
90,648
-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:32
90,649
-8
7 Aug 2026, 11:43
90,657
-11
6 Aug 2026, 20:15
90,668
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:06
90,668
first reading
Engagement
229 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 91,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,700
227 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
229
of 229 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
229 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
3,120,833
Reactions total
87,179
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈38,000
Videos
≈27,400
Links
≈23,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 42m
Average length
2m 32s
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87,179 reactions across 226 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
19,721
22.6%
🤬
11,686
13.4%
🔥
10,996
12.6%
🤣
6,777
7.77%
🙏
6,291
7.22%
🤡
5,712
6.55%
😁
4,936
5.66%
❤
3,274
3.76%
🖕
2,975
3.41%
👏
2,920
3.35%
💩
2,233
2.56%
💯
1,501
1.72%
😡
1,182
1.36%
🤮
1,180
1.35%
👎
1,168
1.34%
🤔
1,130
1.30%
💊
1,039
1.19%
😢
467
0.536%
🫡
419
0.481%
😱
184
0.211%
26 further kinds
1,388
1.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 227 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87,179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 227 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @military_zB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 229 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Иран готовится к новому витку конфликта, — The Wall Street Journal.
Тегеран использовал прекращение огня для подготовки к возможной новой эскалации. Иран усиливает КСИР, наращивает производство ракет и БПЛА и расширяет контакты с союзными группировками в регионе.
В Тегеране считают, что основная фаза конфликта ещё впереди, и готовятся как к новым ударам, так и к возможным попыткам дестабилизации ситуации внутри стр…
Латвия требует от ЕС €7 млрд на покрытие оборонных расходов и потерь от разрыва связей с Россией.
Ничего личного, просто бизнес: сам создай угрозу > объяви о ней > сам введи санкции > публично страдай от того, что ты ввел санкции > требую компенсацию > profit.
Курский кандидат в депутаты от партии «Яблоко» Новиков пожаловался, что на всех его рекламных листовках «За свободу!» кто-то специально замазывает черным маркером буквы «боду».
Также на его баннере с лозунгом «За жизнь без страха!» кто-то специально стирает букву «с» в слове «страха».
Бывший конгрессмен США Марджори Тейлор Грин заявила, что Белый дом и Пентагон обсуждают возможность применения ядерного оружия против Ирана:
«Я не предполагаю, я знаю. И это абсолютное зло», — написала Грин в соцсети X, но не привела никаких доказательств в подтверждение своего заявления.
Она добавила, что американские лидеры будут привлечены к ответственности "историей", если произойдет ядерный конфликт.
6 мирных жителей погибли, четверо пострадали, в том числе ребёнок, при ракетном обстреле села Колосково в Белгородской области
Всего за ночь российская ПВО сбила 205 БПЛА.
США выводят свой последний авианосец из Азии.
USS George Washington покидает Тихий океан, чтобы заменить USS Abraham Lincoln на Ближнем Востоке в условиях затяжного конфликта с Ираном, сообщает ABC News.
Российские ВКС нанесли удар по мосту Преображенского через Днепр в Запорожье
Также сообщается об ударе по Кременчугскому нефтеперерабатывающему заводу. До начала СВО предприятие было единственным действующим НПЗ на Украине и обеспечивало более 30% потребностей украинского рынка.
Кроме того, поступают сообщения о новых ударах по Кривому Рогу.
Следующий глобальный экономический кризис может начаться в Китае из-за перепроизводства, — Foreign Affairs.
Китай производит всё больше товаров, чем способен поглотить мировой рынок: на страну уже приходится около 30% мирового промышленного производства, а к 2030 году доля может достичь 45%. Торговый профицит КНР в 2025 году приблизился к рекордным $1,2 трлн.
Дальнейшее перепроизводство и рост торговых барьеров мог…
ВС РФ за сегодня в порту Одессы поразили три сухогруза и два танкера. Также заявлено об ударах по резервуарам с топливом и складам.
Ещё атакован сухогруз в Черном море восточнее Одессы.
В Белгороде-Днестровском поражены цех по производству и склад комплектующих и боевых частей для морских дронов, а в Вилково - стоянка патрульных катеров ВМС Украины.
Прилеты частично подтверждены кадрами местных с мест.
👍276🔥97❤19👏12❤🔥5🤣3👎1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @military_zB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 142,406 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@military_zB named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@luckybear named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Сводки и Аналитика СВО (Резерв) @rezervsvo · 206,207#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Оружейный Мастер @oruzhejnyj_master · 113,159 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Сводки и Аналитика СВО (Резерв) @rezervsvo · 206,207 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Военные Сводки - Чё там в мире?” (@military_zB), 91,355 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/military_zB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
