7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,661–22,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:14
22,666
-8
11 Aug 2026, 14:14
22,674
-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:07
22,676
-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:12
22,683
-15
7 Aug 2026, 19:57
22,698
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:00
22,700
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:54
22,700
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.49%
avg views ÷ 22,666 subscribers
Avg views / post
563
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
12,960
Reactions total
495
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,670
Videos
≈1,170
Links
≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 25s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
495 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
255
51.5%
🔥
114
23.0%
😁
34
6.87%
💯
23
4.65%
👏
18
3.64%
👍
16
3.23%
😍
12
2.42%
🙏
10
2.02%
🥰
7
1.41%
😢
3
0.606%
😱
2
0.404%
😨
1
0.202%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 495reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 по ольфактотерапии — 6 дней против стресса, тревожности и выгорания
Вы уже знаете, что ароматы способны менять состояние, решения и качество жизни. Эфирные масла работают на уровне нервной системы и дают результат, который заметен сразу.
Но что это значит на практике, как ощущается, как работает? Чтобы попробовать себя в роли ольфактотерапевта и получить свой первый результат — присоединяйтесь к бесплатн…
Я боюсь своей мечты. Боюсь, что не справлюсь.
Что делать?
Этот вопрос мне задали после эфира, и я обрадовалась. Да, именно обрадовалась, и в подкасте объясняю почему.
📣 Рассказываю про 3 страха, которые прячутся за словом «не справлюсь», вопрос, который отличает один от другого за минуту, и даю приём, после которого страх начинает работать на цель.
Слушать стоит сегодня. Завтра, 12 августа, окно Врат Льва закрывае…
Она даже не заметила, как проблема ушла
Марина бежала по делам и совершенно не планировала останавливаться. Но вдруг услышала голос. Та самая клиентка, с которой они работали на курсе по ольфактотерапии, стояла прямо перед ней и улыбалась.
— Вы знаете, — сказала женщина, — а у меня больше нет той проблемы, о которой мы говорили. Она просто исчезла. И самое странное, что я не заметила, когда это случилось. Так естес…
Арома-ежедневник-2027 — ваш личный навигатор на год Огненного Козла
Много лет я живу по собственной системе планирования и целеполагания. И я уверена, что именно она помогает получать результаты и исполнять мечты даже в самые сумасшедшие времена.
В центре этой системы мой собственный Арома-ежедневник — инструмент, который помогает мне (а теперь и вам) реализовывать самые смелые цели через правильное целепоставление…
Я профукала свое здоровье. И не один раз
На эфире про Врата Льва у меня вырвалась фраза, на которой я сама себя поймала. Речь шла о том, что большие планы требуют сил, и я добавила: говорю это как человек, который профукал свое здоровье. И не один раз.
Первый раз закончился аутоиммунным заболеванием и полным параличом. Тогда все сложилось разом: развод, потеря работы, долги, изоляция в чужой стране. Казалось бы, по…
Тошнит от Мирры
Моя ученица с курса «Аромапарфюмерия» 5 лет не переносила запах Мирры, вплоть до рвотного рефлекса. Розу тоже не любила, могла с трудом терпеть только в сильном разведении.
Все изменилось во время нашего курса. На фоне сильного стресса она вдруг захотела попробовать Розу, и в тот вечер аромат раскрылся впервые: она стала дышать им каждый день.
А через несколько недель, продолжая работать с маслами …
📌📌📌📌📌📌📌
Сегодня 8/8 — пик Врат Льва. Самый энергетически мощный день, чтобы заложить цели и мечты на будущий год. Не сдерживаем себя! Что сегодня намечтаем, то и сбудется ✨
Я уже во всеоружии. Ритуал помогает правильно ставить цели, которые сбываются, и активировать их ароматом — знают все, кто смотрел эфир. Что делать сегодня и до 12ого - тоже разобрали на эфире. Действуем!
Если вы еще не видели — срочно смотрите…
⚠️Мошенники! Внимание!⚠️
На канале снова активизировались мошенники. Пишут даже членам команды – так, собственно, и попались.
Они первыми пишут в личку, от моего имени предлагают купить консультацию или вступить в клуб, перейти по ссылке, перевести предоплату на карту и тд. Это 100% обман.
❗️Прошу вас быть бдительными и внимательными.
Наши ссылки на оплату выглядят так: https://annamariaholisticcoach.getcourse.ru…
❤14🙏7👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @aromacoach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вставать утром с энергией и желанием работать, жить, творить31%
Пройти сложный период и возродиться фениксом6%
Тратить деньги на себя легко и свободно6%
Помогать людям и достойно зарабатывать13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Тимофей Кармацкий @karmatsky_timofey · 186,950 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Гимнастика для лица @anyclass_faceonline · 471,249 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Алесь Улищенко | Врач-остеопат, канд. мед. наук | Автор фейспластики @dr_ales · 471,345 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Мария | Научная ароматерапия и ольфактотерапия, эфирные масла” (@aromacoach), 22,666 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aromacoach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.