Channel
@profiaroma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,319subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002092753869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @profiaroma |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/profiaroma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,319 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 1,321 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 1,322 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 1,321 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 1,319 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 1,316 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 1,317 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,318 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 1,318 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
196 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 41.8% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 13.3% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 6.12% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 4.59% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 4.59% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 4.59% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.06% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 3.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
РОЗЫГРЫШ ПОДАРКОВ Друзья, как и обещала, уже в ближайшие дни проведу небольшой розыгрыш для участников Семинара по Эндометриозу. Подарки для розыгрыша я привезла из своих путешествий по Бали и Вьетнаму 🌿 Большую часть подарков я берегу для нового курса, но часть приятных и очень душевных презентов отправятся участникам семинара по эндометриозу уже сейчас. ⤵️ Мне хотелось подобрать не просто сувениры, а вещи, котор…
👍2
Наши лоты для розыгрыша! С 18 июня начинаем: 1 день - 1 лот! ⤵️ Торопитесь, вы еще можете присоединиться и совместить обучение с приятным бонусом: https://grishinaschool.ru/web_girud
👏6
ОПЕРАЦИЯ ПРИ ЭНДОМЕТРИОЗЕ - НЕ РЕШЕНИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ (по моему убеждению) Если бы все так просто было, иссек эндометриоидные очаги, полипы, кисты... и все нет больше проблемы. Но это чаще начало новых проблем, а не решение старой проблемы. И ни один хирург с этим спорить не будет, поскольку все понимают, что это компромисс, чтобы облегчить страдание пациентки, а не лечение. Когда пациенты спокойно соглашаются на операци…
❤10🤩2🥰2
Какой, по вашему мнению, метод номер 1 по эффективности в работе с эндометриозом?
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я бы ранжировала для эндометриоза этот список следующим образом: 1️⃣ПИЯВКИ 2️⃣БАДы 3️⃣Все остальные средства Для каждого заболевания будут свои инструменты и разное ранжирование по степени значимости.
💯4👍3🔥2
Почему пиявки для меня на 1 месте и как я вижу современный подход в успещной работе с ним.
👍6🔥3❤2💯2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
ОТКРЫТА РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ НА СЕМИНАР ПО ЭНДОМЕТРИОЗУ 💡 11 июня состоится семинар из цикла усовершенствования по гирудотерапии, посвящённый одной из самых сложных и актуальных тем в женском здоровье - эндометриозу. ⤵️ Весь материал уже отобран, структурирован и проверен практикой. Это уникальная возможность получить за один семинар то, что большинство специалистов собирают по крупицам годами. ⤵️ Здесь вы можете посмотрет…
❤10🔥5🥰3🤩1
Зум взломали и запись не удалась, поэтому вебинар запишем и проведем на соедующей неделе, запись выложу.
👍9
Video message, posted without a caption
🤩2
«Как создать дополнительный доход сегодня, чтобы не бояться за деньги завтра» Спикеры: 💚Гришина Марина, врач, остеопат, гирудотерапевт, ароматерапевт, основатель Учебного центра восстановительных практик. 💚Снедковская Марина, специалист интегративной медицины, ароматерапевт 21 апреля в 13.00 по мск проведем живой эфир. Сейчас кризис и иллюзия под названием стабильность рушится у многих. Расскажем, какие мы нашли…
❤7
Никого и ни к чему агитировать не будем. Когда-то этот путь Марина Снедковская показала мне и теперь я могу путешествовать «без обратного билета». Вебинар информационный, захотите, используете эту возможность.
❤12👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @profiaroma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой, по вашему мнению, метод номер 1 по эффективности в работе с эндометриозом?
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 15 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 407,790 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор Гришина: профессионально об ароматерапии” (@profiaroma), 1,319 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profiaroma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.