Channel
@dari_jacquard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
728subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001747877025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dari_jacquard |
| Description | Наши вещи крадут сердца, а жаккард ткет настоящую историю 💔 👉🏼 Заказы, вопросы, сотрудничество - @darijacquardbrand Больше на нашем сайте darijacquard.ru Разработка авторских жаккардовых тканей |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dari_jacquard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 728 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 728 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (13 June 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,062 |
| Reactions total | 119 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
283 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 171 | 60.4% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 19.8% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 4.24% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 3.53% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 3.18% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 2.47% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 2.12% | |
| custom 5469654973308476699 | 5 | 1.77% | |
| custom 5415986543741390731 | 4 | 1.41% | |
| custom 5415763879751863367 | 2 | 0.707% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.353% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ Завтра — та самая редкая возможность увидеть Darí Jacquard офлайн. Нас совершенно неожиданно пригласили принять участие в маркете в Севкабель Порту - освободилось место, а мы решили не упускать шанс) Если вы давно хотели познакомиться с брендом вживую, потрогать авторские жаккардовые ткани, примерить изделия и увидеть все детали, которые невозможно передать через экран, - обязательно приходите! А самое приятное …
❤12🔥9😍2
Ссылка для ПОДДЕРЖКИ БРЕНДА 🫶 https://t.tb.ru/c2c-qr-choose-bank?requisiteNumber=+79992129122&bankCode=100000000004
❤8👌3custom 54157638797518633672
Очень личный пост 🫶 Обычно здесь я показываю красивые ткани, новые коллекции, показы и творческий процесс. Но за кадром, жизнь небольшого независимого бренда выглядит совсем иначе. И об этом мне говорить гораздо сложнее. Последние месяцы стали для Darí Jacquard непростыми: международный показ во Франции - огромный шаг вперед для бренда,новые знакомства, новые возможности и подтверждение, что мои работы интересны да…
❤20🕊12💔6🦄2
Dari Textil -> Darí Jacquard 2021-2026 Многие уже заметили, что название нашего бренда незаметно изменилось, и мы надеемся, что новое имя полюбится вам так же, как когда-то полюбилось Dari Textil. Что произошло? За пять лет бренд вырос, сформировал собственный стиль и достиг нового этапа своего развития. Мы давно задумывались о смене названия, но именно поездка во Францию и международный показ стали тем самым моме…
❤19🔥14👌7custom 54159865437413907313
PARIS WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING 🇫🇷 4 июля Darí Jacquard представил авторскую коллекцию на международном проекте Art Storytelling Route de la Soie de la Mode в культурном центре Les Franciscaines. На одной площадке встретились дизайнеры со всего мира. Darí Jacquard представил Россию через авторский художественный жаккард и архитектурную эстетику. Среди гостей показа были представители индустрии моды, прессы и культур…
🔥24❤20custom 54696549733084766992
🤯DARÍ JACQUARD PARIS🇫🇷 Bonjour! Мы давно не выходили на связь, потому что последний месяц готовились к важному этапу в истории бренда. Мы приехали в Париж с командой и моделями. С коллекцией и миром Darí Jacquard, который когда-то существовал только в моём воображении. Завтра состоится показ. За этой фразой годы работы: эскизы, ткани, первые коллекции, сомнения, риски, сотни решений, которые однажды привели меня…
❤57🦄5
🗣В НАЛИЧИИ Жаккардовый бомбер «Mosaïque» от Darí Textil 🎩 Одна из самых сложных и редких моделей бренда. Каждый бомбер собирается вручную из десятков фрагментов авторских жаккардовых тканей, где маленькие кусочки превращаются в единое полотно, словно нити разных историй, сплетённые в одну. На создание одного такого изделия уходит не один день кропотливой работы. Поэтому каждая модель получается по-настоящему ун…
❤8custom 54696549733084766993👍1
❗️ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЕ❗️ 📷ищем фотографа в Париже с 30 июня по 5 июля на один из дней верим в силу тысячи рукопожатий будем благодарны репосту🫲
❤5
Новинки, о которых мы не рассказывали, но вам стоит увидеть 🐚🍇Корсет Jardin de la Reine - "Сад Королевы Эдем " История создания : " Это фрагмент моей личной истории, как дизайнера. Когда-то, задолго до создания Darí Textil, я находилась в периоде творческого поиска. Изучала тело в движении, костюм как сцену, и часто обращалась к эпохе барокко - времени, где одежда была не просто одеждой, а архитектурой статуса, …
❤22🔥9😍7custom 54159865437413907311
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dari_jacquard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 235,703 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dari_jacquard named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DARI JACQUARD” (@dari_jacquard), 728 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dari_jacquard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.