9 measurements spanning 10 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,881–16,926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 05:06
16,915
-6
14 Aug 2026, 17:24
16,921
+3
13 Aug 2026, 09:37
16,918
+8
12 Aug 2026, 07:22
16,910
+7
11 Aug 2026, 06:12
16,903
+17
9 Aug 2026, 02:51
16,886
-9
8 Aug 2026, 04:17
16,895
-5
7 Aug 2026, 02:02
16,900
+3
6 Aug 2026, 06:33
16,897
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 16,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
27 (25 June 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
24,398
Reactions total
262
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
630
Videos
7
Links
593
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
44s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
487 reactions across 24 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
198
40.7%
👍
125
25.7%
🔥
101
20.7%
🎉
26
5.34%
🤔
14
2.87%
😁
7
1.44%
🥰
6
1.23%
👏
3
0.616%
😱
3
0.616%
😢
2
0.411%
🤩
1
0.205%
🤬
1
0.205%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 569reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.70%
1 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,790
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,130
over 26 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvR3pwU
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
ПСИХОТОМИЯ (РАЗРЕЗАНИЕ ДУШИ). РУССКИЙ МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ХОРРОР. БУ!
Внимание! Внимание! Внимание! От создателя и главного редактора телеграм-канала «Медицинская Россия» Игоря Артюхова! Шок-контент! Книга, которую ваш покорный слуга прочёл, не отрываясь, и даже написал на неё рецензию! Произведение, которое разнесло вдрезбги все представления о хорошем и плохом, справедливом и несправедливом, черном и белом, правде и непра…
О ПРИМЕНЕНИИ ПРЕПАРАТОВ, ПРИОБРЕТЕННЫХ ЗА РУБЕЖОМ
Ещё один вопрос прилетел к нам из нашего неунывающего развеселого чатика. На этот раз – про применение лекарственных препаратов, привезённых из далекого забугорья, а конкретно – ВМС (не путать с ВКС) «Мирена». Вопрос состоял в том – можно ли отечественному гинекологу этот препарат, купленный в буржуйской аптеке, применить пациентке по прямому назначению и с её, разум…
КАК ОПЛАЧИВАЕТСЯ ТРУД ПАТОЛОГОАНАТОМА
Прилетел тут вопрос из неувядающего нашенского чатега, про верных друзей судмедэкспертов – патанатомов. А точнее, как оплачивается их труд скорбный.
Вопрос звучал так: Как следует расценивать позицию ФФОМС о том, что «содержание и оплата труда специалистов, проводящих патологоанатомические вскрытия, осуществляется за счёт средств соответствующего бюджета»? Кто конкретно должен …
🚨3 документа, с которых может начаться проверка вашей клиники
Ошибки в них способны создать медицинской организации проблемы ещё до того, как проверяющие перейдут к остальным процессам.
Александр Парюгин — юрист для медицинского бизнеса, экс-директор юридического отдела МИА.РФ.
В канале:
✅ проверки и юридические риски
✅ медицинские карты и документация
✅ претензии пациентов
✅ защита интересов клиник
Для владельце…
БЮДЖЕТИНСКИЙ «РЕКОРД»
Судья Бюджетинского городского суда, Федор Игоревич Моралов, молча сидел в своём кабинете и периодически тяжело вздыхал. Тяжесть его вздоха была сравнима с тяжестью дела, по которому ему придётся сегодня выносить решение…
Вздохнув тяжелее обычного, Фёдор Игоревич, взял телефон и набрал привычный номер:
- Судья областного суда Царьков слушает, - официально раздалось в трубке
- Степаныч, приве…
ЕСТЬ РЕКОРД! НОВАЯ РЕКОРДНАЯ СУММА КОМПЕНСАЦИИ МОРАЛЬНОГО ВРЕДА ВЗЫСКАНА С КЛИНИКИ В ПОЛЬЗУ ПАЦИЕНТА!
В народе говорят – плох тот блогер, у которого инсайдов нет. Поэтому делюсь тут одним инсайдом, который правда уже успел завируситься по сети, в том числе найдя отражение и в официальной публикации одного из непосредственных участников события.
Итак – есть новый рекорд по сумме компенсации морального вреда, присужд…
Хороший врач и руководитель клиники — это разные профессии. Первая требует клинической экспертизы. Вторая — знания бизнеса: экономики, управления, маркетинга, права.
Чаще всего на должность руководителя медорганизации берут врача с большим опытом. Но у него нет профильной подготовки. Это приводит к перегруженным командам, неэффективной работе и финансовым потерям, даже если у вас высокое качество медицинских услуг.
…
ПРО ОМС-ного СУСЛИКА
Думаю, знаменитая цитата из фильма «ДМБ» всем хорошо известна. Суслики – они бывают разных пород. Есть суслики монгольские – их тарбаганами кличут, лично их встречал в монгольских степях, а есть суслики ОМС-ные. Те, которых не видно, но они есть.
Недавно разместил пост с решением суда по факту в мошенничества в ОМС, процитировал решение и…получил комментарий от коллеги, обладателя чёрного пояса…
ПЛАТНЫЕ МЕДИЦИНСКИЕ УСЛУГИ: ОБ ОФЕРТЕ И ДИСТАНЦИОННОМ СПОСОБЕ ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЯ ДОГОВОРА
Тут очередной вопрос задали в чате на тему заключения договора на оказание платных медицинских услуг путём акцепта оферты. Что такое акцепт и что такое оферта позвольте пожалуйста не разъяснять, но вот сам вопрос видимо действительно требует разъяснения.
Суть вопроса в том, что его автор описала довольно стандартную схему, когда с пот…
О КОНСТИТУЦИОННОСТИ Ч. 1 СТ. 20 323-ФЗ
Информированное добровольное согласие, как известно, один из краеугольных камней медицинского права. Как по мне – так совершенно бесполезный институт в том виде, в котором есть. И не только по моему мнению – народ регулярно в Конституционный суд входит, где подвергает сомнению конституционность ч. 1 ст. 20 Федерального закона от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ.
Ну той, которой устанавлива…
А БЫЛО ЛИ МОШЕННИЧЕСТВО? МОЖЕТ МОШЕННИЧЕСТВА-ТО И НЕ БЫЛО?
Еще один вопрос, заданный в чате канала, становится предметом отдельного поста. Надо сказать, что данный вопрос создал в голове админа канала очередной ненавистнический врачебный образ. К имеющимися в восполненном от частых размышлений на тему медицинского права сознании админа образам врача-убийцы и врача-фальсификатора, успешно добавился образ врача-мошенн…
👍9❤5👏2
Signed Иван Печерей
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @pravomedapologists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 108,331 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Медицинская Россия @mediamedics · 143,092 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Мурашко по коже 🩺🏥 @murashko_med · 135,602 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Медицинский юрист Иван Печерей” (@pravomedapologists), 16,915 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pravomedapologists.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
