This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +815. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,924–64,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:54
64,036
+253
12 Aug 2026, 17:22
63,783
+396
11 Aug 2026, 15:13
63,387
+217
10 Aug 2026, 14:15
63,170
+7
9 Aug 2026, 17:02
63,163
+28
8 Aug 2026, 16:21
63,135
+66
7 Aug 2026, 14:05
63,069
-151
6 Aug 2026, 13:23
63,220
-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:45
63,221
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:37
63,221
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 64,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.326%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
65 (1 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
696,240
Reactions total
2,270
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,970
Videos
≈721
Links
≈8,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 40s
Average length
5m 40s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,270 reactions across 65 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
847
37.3%
🔥
516
22.7%
💯
411
18.1%
👍
374
16.5%
🍌
87
3.83%
👎
35
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ростовское судейское ОПС обживается в костромской женской колонии
Бывшая председатель Ростовского областного суда Елена Золотарева прибыла отбывать свой, пока что 15-летний срок в ФКУ ИК-8 УФСИН по Костромской области. И присоединилась в колонии к уже отбывающей там срок своей заместительнице Татьяне Юровой.
Елена Золотарева родилась в 1958 году в городе Шахты Ростовской области. Обучалась на юридическом факультете…
Квалификационная коллегия судей Ростовской области рассмотрела вопросы привлечения судей к дисциплинарной ответственности:
- утвердила заключение комиссии по результатам проверки обращений, содержащих сведения о совершении судьей Шахтинского городского суда Ростовской области Полтавцевым И.А. дисциплинарного проступка, признала наличие в его действиях дисциплинарного проступка, за совершение которого наложила дисципл…
Судья заявила самоотход
И выразила недоверие российской судебной системе.
Ростовскую судью Цмакалову объявили в межгосударственный розыск.
Цмакалова фигурирует в уголовном деле в качестве участника преступной группы, организованной экс-председателем Советского районного суда Ростова-на-Дону Еленой Коблевой.
Группа брала взятки за вынесение неправосудных решений по различным категориям дел, согласовывая свои решени…
Перестановки оборотней в СУ СК России по Ростовской области
В Ростовской области из Миллеровского МРСО пару месяцев назад убрали вечно пьяного руководителя Асташина (кличка "Астик").
Вместо него МРСО теперь руководит сын судьи Ростовского областного суда, подельника судей Золотаревой и Юровой — герой канала Зама, молодой Тахиров Руслан Эльшанович.
Как говорится — в мафии семья прежде всего.
@zamuprav
Апелляционная инстанция Ростовского областного суда в очередной раз не увидела реального содержания в очередном деле, расследованным некомпетентным Первым СУ ГСУ СК РФ и направленным в суд бывшим замгенпрокурора Андреем Кикотем.
Ростовская апелляция завернула очередное громкое уголовное дело в отношении сотрудников полиции по ст. 210 УК РФ.
Об этом в своем телеграм-канале рассказал адвокат Владимир Чесноков.
@zamupr…
Строитель коммунизма в красносулинской мантии
«Не ищи правды в других,
коли её в тебе нет» — русская пословица.
Странный персонаж под видом председателя суда уже как год периодически заезжает на электричке в город Красный Сулин Ростовской области.
Не успели утихнуть обсуждения похождений прошлого «царька», которого ушли в «почётную отставку» вместо посадки в камеру к Рощевскому и Золотарёвой, тут новое дать повод п…
Коллеги Зама доводят до читателей и кураторов общее мнение и Третьем судебном составе Ростовского областного суда
Коллеги уверены, что состав практически поголовно состоит из взяточников!
Председатель состава Хомич Светлана Владимировна -- взяточница
Алферова Наталия Анатольевна -- взяточница
Боровая Елена Александровна -- взяточница
Боровлева Оксана Юрьевна -- взяточница
Головнев Иван Викторович -- взяточник
Горбат…
Пломба Россетей Эбзеева, которой не должно было быть. Обычный технический инцидент с повреждением внешней металлической двери трансформаторного отсека штормовым ветром усилиями монополиста обернулся в скандальную мошенническую историю с возможным подлогом документов, фальсификацией подписей со стороны Россетей
️Редакции Компромат ГРУПП стали известны подробности ранее описанной скандальной истории в ПАО «Россети Юг»…
Один из серьезных руководителей краснодарского направления работы Сбербанка РФ попал в прицел одной очень серьезной структуры, курирующей банковскую сферу РФ.
Сберовцы, вы там держитесь! Деньги у вас пока есть.
@RadioReznik
Вчера была задержана экс-заместитель председателя Юго-Западного банка Сбербанка
Экс заместитель председателя Юго-Западного банка Сбербанка РФ Ирина Ткаченко не впервые попадает на страницы криминальной хроники.
В 2023 году ее задержали в аэропорту Минеральных вод, за контрабанду бриллианта. В тот раз Сберу удалось договориться с судом и следствием, Ирину Ткаченко осудили условно и уволили из банка.
На этот раз Ирин…
👍19❤3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @zamuprav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 321,792 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юрий Слюсарь @Yuri_Slusar · 166,758 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ - РОСТОВ НОВОСТИ - 161 @rostov_glavniy · 274,646 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Новости Ростова | 161.RU @news161ru · 214,594 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зам всех управлений” (@zamuprav), 64,036 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zamuprav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
