Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Уголовная практика ВС РФ

@supreme_crime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,051subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001200420254
TypeChannel
Username@supreme_crime
DescriptionМониторинг практики по уголовным делам Верховного Суда РФ Руководитель проекта: к.ю.н. Владислав Радов @v_radov Заявление в РКН № 4807229242 Подписаться: https://t.me/tribute?start=sd173 СКЭС/СКГД: @supreme_civil Запрет рекламы.
Created29 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/supreme_crime

Growth

15,01315,05315,0336 August 2026 — 15,014 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,014 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,013 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,015 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,013 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,043 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,050 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,053 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,051 subscribers15,0516 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,007–15,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:4815,051-2
12 Aug 2026, 12:4415,053+3
11 Aug 2026, 12:4315,050+7
10 Aug 2026, 13:4515,043+30
9 Aug 2026, 14:2115,013-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:2615,015+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:0115,013-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:0415,014no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4415,014first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.9%
avg views ÷ 15,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,800
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 March 202613 August 2026)
Views total14,400
Reactions total195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Links
76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,373 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍49035.7%
41230.0%
🔥30622.3%
👏926.70%
🤔241.75%
😱211.53%
👎181.31%
🤯40.291%
🕊30.218%
🗿30.218%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,373reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @supreme_crime. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.76%
1 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
10,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,240
over 20 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqVG57rYeaVHCcjkWw8nXeFaNtSMRQLCb4rJfL14 May 20264 May 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,470 views30 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Онлайн-семинар «Квалификация хищений» 🔺16 августа, 11:00 мск, на платформе Zoom При участии к.ю.н. В.Н. Шиханова состоится онлайн-семинар по сложным вопросам квалификации хищений. 1. В частности, предложено обсудить решение, на которое к нам поступило много вопросов от адвокатов и следователей – Определение СКУД ВС от 17.06.2026 по делу № 74-УД26-1-К9 о разграничении ст. 159 и 285 УК в случае фиктивного трудоустро

14🔥9👍5🤔1😱1

Signed VladislavRadov

27 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC≈6,210 views89 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Автомобиль не подлежит конфискации по делу о сбыте лишь потому, что в нём находились наркотические средства (п. «г» ч. 1 ст. 104¹, 228¹ УК) … 🔺Кассационное определение от 09.07.2026 по делу № 78-УД26-10-К3 👨‍⚖️Лавров Н.Г. 👩‍⚖️Пейсикова Е.В. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Рудаков Е.В. Справка: 1) Г. с целью сбыта приобрёл семена конопли и оборудование для её выращивания, осуществил посев и выращивание, получил части наркосодержаще

👍5022🔥12👎4🤔1

Signed VladislavRadov

26 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈5,720 views76 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Конфискация эквивалента легализованного имущества невозможна, если его стоимость уже взыскана в пользу потерпевшего по делу о хищении (ст. 159, 174.1 УК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 08.07.2026 по делу № 67-УДП26-11-К8 👨‍⚖️Зеленин С.Р. (докладчик) 👩‍⚖️Кочина И.Г. 👨‍⚖️Боровиков В.П. Справка: 1) Г. осуждён приговором от 04.12.2017 по ч. 4 ст. 159 УК за хищение недвижимости ОАО «Э» стоимостью 100 млн. руб. 2) Тем же

👍3323🔥19🤔1

Signed VladislavRadov

29 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC≈8,240 views73 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Явка с повинной взяткодателя после обыска по делу в отношении взяткополучателя может быть добровольной, если сведения о взятках стали известны из нее … 🔺Кассационное определение от 24.06.2026 по делу № 127-УД26-13-К4 👨‍⚖️Фаргиев И.А. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Сабуров Д.Э. 👨‍⚖️Эрдыниев Э.Б. Справка: 1) Б. (учредитель ООО) дважды перечислил деньги начальнику отдела ГУП Г. за ускорение тестирования приборов учёта электроэнергии

33🔥19👏14👍7

Signed VladislavRadov

26 Jun 2026, 15:39 UTC≈7,940 views77 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Ссылка на «высокую социальную опасность» не обосновывает отмену условного осуждения (ст. 73, 159 УК). 🔺Кассационное определение от 25.06.2026 по делу № 75-УДП26-3-К3 👨‍⚖️Абрамов С.Н. (докладчик) 👩‍⚖️Романова Т.А. 👨‍⚖️Рудаков Е.В. Справка: 1) Фермер Ш. осуждена за 5 эпизодов мошенничества при получении субсидий для глав КФХ. Полученные средства были инвестированы в сельское хозяйство и создание рабочих мест. 2) Учи

👍3423🔥15🗿3👎2

Signed VladislavRadov

25 Jun 2026, 05:00 UTC≈7,220 views56 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Приемка некачественных аппаратов ИВЛ в ковид по поручению руководства образует состав злоупотребления, а не халатности (ст. 286-285-293 УК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 18.06.2026 по делу № 20-УДП26-3-К5 👨‍⚖️Абрамов С.Н. (докладчик) 👩‍⚖️Романова Т.А. 👨‍⚖️Рудаков Е.В. Справка: 1) Мирзаева (главврач центра инфекционных болезней) в марте 2020 г. по инициативе минздрава были получены 8 аппаратов ИВЛ в рамках госконтра

🔥2514👍10🤔5🤯2

Signed VladislavRadov

22 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC≈7,520 views53 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Освобождение по примечанию требует погашения всей задолженности по алиментам, а не только за инкриминируемый период (ст. 157 УК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 17.06.2026 по делу № 78-УДП26-11-К3 👨‍⚖️Сабуров Д.Э. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Абрамов С.Н. 👨‍⚖️Лавров Н.Г. Справка: 1) Калашников обвинялся в неуплате алиментов за период с 26.04.2024 по 31.07.2024 (65 089 руб.). 2) По ИП задолженность с 2021 года составляет 1 192 272

👍2515🔥13

Signed VladislavRadov

19 Jun 2026, 14:03 UTC≈8,500 views80 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Фиктивное трудоустройство из личной заинтересованности образует состав злоупотребления, а не мошенничества (ст. 159, 285 УК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 17.06.2026 по делу № 74-УД26-1-К9 👨‍⚖️Червоткин А.С. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Боровиков В.П. 👩‍⚖️Кочина И.Г. Справка: 1) Завкафедрой Семенов оформил своего друга З. (заключившего досудебное соглашение о сотрудничестве) заведующим лабораторией на 0,5 ставки, заранее догово

🔥40🤔12👍108😱5👎3👏2

Signed VladislavRadov

18 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC≈7,730 views81 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Сама по себе разница между полученными по муниципальному контракту средствами и фактической стоимостью работ не может предрешать вывод о мошенничестве (ст. 159 УК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 14.05.2026 по делу № 85-УД26-2-К1 👨‍⚖️Сабуров Д.Э. 👩‍⚖️Пейсикова Е.В. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Рудаков Е.В. Справка: 1) Столяров (и.о. директора МУП) заключил мунконтракт на ремонт аварийной переправы – работы выполнены, приняты зака

👍3628🔥14🕊3

Signed VladislavRadov

16 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC≈7,560 views90 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Малозначительность незаконной рубки 4 деревьев на 6 373 руб. (ч. 2 ст. 14 УК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 10.06.2026 по делу № 10-УД26-4-К6 👨‍⚖️Зеленин С.Р. 👨‍⚖️Боровиков В.П. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Червоткин А.С. Справка: 1) Директор ООО СК «Н.» Залесов в 2024 г. на арендуемом лесном участке путём введения в заблуждение членов бригады организовал рубку 4 деревьев (2 породы ель и 2 породы осина, – 0,34 и 1,15 куб.м. соо

👏4522🔥14👎6🤔3

Signed VladislavRadov

1 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC≈9,260 views72 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Уголовное дело о налоговом преступлении не может быть возбуждено до вступления в силу решения ИФНС (ч. 1.3 ст. 140 УПК) 🔺Кассационное определение от 26.05.2026 по делу № 5-УД26-43-К2 👨‍⚖️Фаргиев И.А. 👨‍⚖️Эрдыниев Э.Б. (докладчик) 👨‍⚖️Куменков А.В. Справка: 1) 20.05.2022 и 09.06.2022 в следственный орган поступили копия Акта ВНП от 25.01.2022 в отношении ООО «С.» и иные материалы налоговой проверки. 2) 06.10.2022 в

33👏20🔥11👍6🤯2

Signed VladislavRadov

1 Jun 2026, 14:48 UTC≈7,420 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Завершается набор на программу квалификации отдельных групп преступлений 🔺Уголовное право. Особенная часть. Квалификация преступлений 2 июня 2026 года начинается онлайн-обучение по образовательной программе «Квалификация отдельных групп преступлений», которая посвящена судебной практике и правилам квалификации. Авторы программы: к.ю.н. В.Н. Шиханов и к.ю.н. В.В. Радов ⤵️Присоединиться к программе и изучить ее сод

7👍5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @supreme_crime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 950,656 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уголовная практика ВС РФ” (@supreme_crime), 15,051 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/supreme_crime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.