7 measurements spanning 14 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,504–1,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 18:36
1,506
-3
18 Aug 2026, 05:42
1,509
+1
14 Aug 2026, 19:55
1,508
-7
11 Aug 2026, 05:28
1,515
-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:32
1,517
-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:34
1,520
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:27
1,520
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 1,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
12 (12 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
1,170
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
3m 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
184 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
66
35.9%
🔥
61
33.2%
🎉
27
14.7%
❤🔥
13
7.07%
🤣
13
7.07%
🕊
3
1.63%
👍
1
0.543%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miramiheart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Первые два раза Питер сбил меня с ног.
Я стирал ноги до жопы, наматывая 30 тысяч шагов, пытался успеть всё, смотрел на эту красоту и думал, это реально существует? Было ярко, эмоционально, с алкоголем, ибо в Питере пить!
В этот раз я приехал на неделю и впервые не пытался съесть город целиком.
Я никуда не спешил, ничего не планировал. Можно было выспаться, выйти гулять без плана. Зайти на выставку и не пробежать её…
Я стал менее ярким учеником. Раньше на любых обучениях я был тем человеком, который первым поднимает руку.
Кто хочет попробовать? - Я!
Кто готов выйти в практику? - Я!
Кто сейчас на глазах у сорока человек будет что-то исполнять, ошибаться, краснеть и получать обратную связь? - Ну конечно Анатолий!
Мне никогда не было страшно проявляться. Я мог задавать вопросы, спорить, выходить первым и якать, якать, якать. А сей…
В этом аудио:
👨🏫 как сейчас проходит моё обучение на психолога-консультанта, что дала мне профессиональная база
🔮 почему магическая чуйка постепенно обрастает душными таблицами и концептуализациями
🫠 где я честно сачкую и почему психология не профессия для тех, у кого лапки🐾
🌚 ещё немного об эзотерике, публичной критике, внутреннем самозванце и о том, как не превратиться в ходячую методичку в пиджаке.
🎙40 минут мое…
Терапия не страхует от падений
Терапия не делает так, что вы идёте по жизни только правильной дорогой.
Вы всё равно можете свернуть не туда, потерять себя, влюбиться не в того человека, проигнорировать очевидные красные флаги, раствориться в отношениях, потерять деньги, разбить себе сердце. Снова наступить на те же грабли, которые сто раз проработали.
логичен вопрос:
Мисьё Анатолий, а какого х#я тогда я вообще хожу…
Какого х#я терапия меня не спасла?
У меня была претензия к терапии долгое время.
Какого хуя я заплатил сотни тысяч за терапию, постоянно копался в себе, что-то осознавал, выполнял упражнения и после этого всё равно вляпался в отношения, которые меня разъебали?
Я же психолог, я был в терапии.
Почему я не увидел, что растворяюсь в человеке?
Почему не замечал, как закрываю глаза на то, что мне не подходит?
Почему мол…
Какого х#я терапия меня не спасла?
— почему терапия не обязана спасать нас от ошибок
— зачем нужно пройти через очень болезненный опыт
— почему после полутора лет я снова возвращаюсь к своему психологу
Терапия не делает так, что ты больше никогда не упадёшь.
Она делает так, что после падения ты сможешь подняться.
Три года назад я вообще не думал, что меня будут приглашать на эфиры рассказывать о профессии психолога, но сегодня как раз такой день😁
Если у вас такие же мысли как у меня 3 года назад:
— а как вообще устроены люди?
— почему одни и те же сценарии повторяются снова и снова?
— почему всё понимаю головой, а живу всё равно по-старому?
— или вам просто интересна психология как профессия…
Сегодня в 13:00 по мск залейта…
С днём рождения меня, 36🕺
Праздную в Питере, тут в третий раз. Улетел на неделю, до этого был по 4+- дня и ничего не успевал. Самая спокойная поездка, никуда не спешу, ничего не планирую, двигаюсь по течению Невы, жизни и настроения. Отрефлексирую потом 🌚
сегодня иду на свидание с незнакомкой 🌚 шестое свидание за 1,5 года. Будем гулять в парке. Эмоции смешанные. Взаимный лайк на twinby, не переписывались, я сразу позвал на прогулку изучив анкету девушки.
Дано: овен, 35+ лет, путешествия, собаки, кони, бокс и пилатес.
С другой стороны душнила Анатолий😁
в комментариях принимаю вредные и не вредные советы на свидании🤣
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @miramiheart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ВсеЛенская Терапия Леонида Тальписа @vselenskayaterapiya · 62,391 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
Юлия Ивлиева @amelisoul_master · 105,668 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Канал ❤️🔥Инны Маруниной @energy_marunina · 58,173 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Поэт эпохи лайков” (@miramiheart), 1,506 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miramiheart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.