Дизайнер, автор фирменных стилей известных Российских брендов — COIS, CNS, Studio29, Viva La Vika, Choux, Agalarov Event etc.
Ресурс включён в перечень Роскомнадзора — https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69eb510a52839ade49e09a77
Created
Between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 92 days, net +3,876. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,696–22,759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 22:16
22,158
-10
6 Nov 2026, 20:20
22,168
+3
5 Nov 2026, 16:48
22,165
-3
4 Nov 2026, 17:49
22,168
-7
3 Nov 2026, 15:15
22,175
+14
2 Nov 2026, 12:51
22,161
-14
1 Nov 2026, 14:05
22,175
+10
31 Oct 2026, 17:00
22,165
+8
30 Oct 2026, 16:10
22,157
-1
29 Oct 2026, 19:08
22,158
+10
28 Oct 2026, 15:56
22,148
+9
27 Oct 2026, 19:18
22,139
+14
26 Oct 2026, 18:38
22,125
+24
25 Oct 2026, 15:27
22,101
+9
24 Oct 2026, 12:20
22,092
+5
23 Oct 2026, 12:39
22,087
+11
22 Oct 2026, 16:09
22,076
+22
21 Oct 2026, 12:29
22,054
+7
20 Oct 2026, 12:56
22,047
+9
19 Oct 2026, 15:58
22,038
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 22,158 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,490
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
33 (15 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
22,460
Reactions total
553
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 03:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,430
Videos
≈190
Links
≈257
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 32m
Average length
25m 34s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,693 reactions across 33 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,408
72.6%
❤🔥
958
20.4%
💔
196
4.18%
🕊
131
2.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 33 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alicedesignwonderland. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В феврале 1990 года вышел первый Photoshop — и фотографов накрыло ровно тем же спором, что сегодня про нейросети. «это не фотография», «это обман зрителя», «настоящий снимок — только с плёнки». Ассоциация пресс-фотографов в тот же год приняла кодекс против цифровых правок, критики писали, что доверие к снимку кончилось навсегда. Прошло тридцать лет: ретушь стала важной строчкой в прайсе любого фотографа, без навыка р…
Туториал по созданию ролика с дополненной реальностью 🐇
Кратко список действий:
1️⃣ Продумайте сценарий учитывая то, что должен делать персонаж в кадре (вы не сможете брать его руками, держать, он не сможет влиять на вас без полной деформации ваших действий. Поэтому если вы хотите сохранить реалистичность — взаимодействуйте с героем «на расстоянии»)
2️⃣Снимите себя на айфон, обрежьте подходящие кадры в кусочках 4-8…
Этот ролик умиляет меня с каждого просмотра — будто маленькая доза дофамина 🤍
И новость, которую многие ждали всю осень..
Мы, наконец, открываем набор на новый поток по нейросетям 🐇
Большая скидка для первых студентов, подробная программа, результаты множества студентов, беспроцентная рассрочка уже ждут вас тут на сайте 🔗
Мест по специальным условиям совсем немного, обычно за сутки разбирают, успевайте 🥹
Главное, …
На смену Nano Banana, кажется, приходит GPT Image 👀
Люблю пробовать задачу по дорисовке иллюстраций поверх фото на разных моделях — все справляются туговато: меняют стиль, рисуют плоско или искажают само фото. Но на днях я заметила, что GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst делает очень круто. И вообще постепенно GPT Image решает мои задачи чуть лучше, чем ранее NanoBanana.
Как сделать такие же иллюстрации на фото:
1️⃣ Выберите …
Вы очень просили запись именно этого эфира "Что делать, когда клиентов стало меньше?" 🤍
Эфир про антикризисную адаптацию, про то как быть фрилансерам сейчас, что менять в своей работе. Выкладываю свободно, буду рада комментариям, если эфир покажется вам полезным.
Важно: на курс присоедениться уже нельзя, скилл выдавался только участникам прямого эфира.
Но просмотр эфира точно ответит на вопрос — как сейчас сориент…
Будьте осторожны, теперь как только редактриуешь текст в посте — телегамм просто сносит весь пост 😐
Пишу заново пост...
Нейросеть, которая на вашем видео заменит все вокруг, но сохранит в идеале вас (или наоборот сделат из вас кота, но сохранит движения) это
Seedance 2.5 в режиме edit 🤍
Доступна, например, в Higgsfield 🔗
Оплатить можно русской кратой через Вконтакте 🔗
Моя структура промпта для всех генераций по…
🎙️Краткий подкаст по нейросети Seedance 2.5 (одна из лучших для любых видео-генераций на сегодняшний день)
• где найти, как зайти
• что можно сделать
• как не потратить кучу денег и токенов
• как изменить также красиво, как Алиса, свои живые видео снятые на простой айфон в простом интерьере?
• какие бывают частые ошибки, как их не совершить
Если полезно — с вас много сердечков 🤍
Столько слов приятных как вчера в конце эфира — я еще не читала 🤍
Спасибо вам большое!
Вчера в начале эфира мне даже было немного тревожно. Так много людей писало про увольнения, про то как сложно найти клиентов, как сарафан старый не работает…
Выдохнула я только в конце. Когда увидела по вашему фидбеку, что на вопрос «что же делать» я ответила и, кажется, как никогда раньше хорошо все объяснила.
Ну а кто забрал с…
Это вообще легально? 🙉
Я когда прочитала первый разбор, если честно, даже немного испугалась.
Потому что действительно получилось сделать такой скилл в Claude, с выводами которого я согласна и он буквально моими мыслями, словами анализирует портфолио.
Проверила на нескольких, завтра также в эфире вам покажу как он работает и подскажу как все это настроить в Claude 🤍
Жду вас сегодня в 19:00
Прямой эфир на тему «Кли…
Мне написала девушка вчера в инстаграм, спросила, как я успеваю все и при этом не выгляжу тревожной / уставшей.
Честный ответ на этот вопрос состоит из нескольких этапов:
1. Долгое время я успевала меньше, потому что училась и углублялась в профессию, затем в навыки ведения блога, затем в бизнес.
То есть я не была продуктивной всегда и не родилась такой.
Это нормально успевать меньше, пока мы осваиваемся и тут ва…
Как я ждала этот анонс 🤍
Долгое время мы не спешили говорить про кризис, так как сами проживали его и адаптировались.
И продолжаем адаптироваться каждый день.
Не важно создаете вы бренд с продукцией или создаете свой личный бренд — в наше время больше не возможно выстроить их случайно. Нужна уверенная стратегия и гибкость в некоторых частях этой стратегии, чтобы подстраиваться под быстроизменяющиеся условия
Как в…
❤82❤🔥23💔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @alicedesignwonderland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@alicedesignwonderland edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @alicedesignwonderland as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мастер-класс Нейросети | 25 июля 20:00 (МСК) @masterclassai · 2,032#1
Мастер-класс | 20 июня 20:00 (МСК) @designmasterclass2006 · 444 (as read 24 September 2026)#2
Мастер-класс 🤍 27 февраля 20.00 @masterclass_design · 826 (as read 24 September 2026)#3
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Яна ProDesign @prodlx · 49,288 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
Будни Jeforel @budni_illustratora · 27,223 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
how to wow @howtowow · 20,723 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
V I V A L A V I K A @Viva_la_vika · 43,166 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
очень по-женски @mashkutovaa · 22,953 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alice From Designland 🤍” (@alicedesignwonderland), 22,158 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alicedesignwonderland.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.