ИИ-инструменты, новости и рабочие схемы: ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, агенты, автоматизация и AI-бизнес. Без хайпа — только то, что можно применить. Реклама: @vlsmits
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
74.9 average views per post against 26,027 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.288%. Across the 9,553 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,031–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.62% and 19.6%, with a median of 9.64%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured
48 of 48 published in the window (48 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,596
Mature posts only
0.3% over 41 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -1,494. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,803–27,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 12:02
26,027
-271
17 Sept 2026, 18:17
26,298
-38
15 Sept 2026, 18:21
26,336
-32
14 Sept 2026, 00:21
26,368
-37
12 Sept 2026, 07:19
26,405
-46
10 Sept 2026, 04:38
26,451
-104
6 Sept 2026, 23:00
26,555
-70
4 Sept 2026, 12:40
26,625
-44
3 Sept 2026, 00:12
26,669
-56
1 Sept 2026, 19:15
26,725
-28
31 Aug 2026, 21:56
26,753
-44
30 Aug 2026, 22:17
26,797
-26
29 Aug 2026, 22:19
26,823
-43
28 Aug 2026, 18:44
26,866
-21
27 Aug 2026, 19:28
26,887
-26
26 Aug 2026, 16:16
26,913
-32
25 Aug 2026, 18:32
26,945
-32
24 Aug 2026, 21:55
26,977
-66
23 Aug 2026, 08:28
27,043
-59
21 Aug 2026, 17:17
27,102
first reading
Engagement
145 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.288%
avg views ÷ 26,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.9
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 145 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
145 (29 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
3,596
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,140
Videos
≈98
Links
≈1,370
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
27.8%
✍
3
16.7%
😁
3
16.7%
🤯
2
11.1%
🐳
1
5.56%
👍
1
5.56%
👎
1
5.56%
🔥
1
5.56%
🤝
1
5.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 145 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 145 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Самая новая модель ИИ может не выйти - безопасность важнее даты релиза.
The New York Times сообщает, что OpenAI не выпустит свою новейшую модель из-за опасений за безопасность. Других подробностей в доступной информации нет: неизвестно, какие именно риски рассматривает компания и когда решение может измениться.
Для пользователей и бизнеса это значит одно: пока не стоит строить рабочие планы вокруг доступа к этой мо…
Налоговая таблица на 50 вкладок - вдвое быстрее. Такой результат Basis показала GPT-6 Astra в сравнении с GPT-5.6 Sol, сообщает OpenAI.
Важен не только темп: по описанию OpenAI, Astra лучше понимает намерения пользователя. Для рабочих задач это может означать меньше уточнений и более уверенное выполнение запроса - но источник не приводит подробностей о методике сравнения и качестве итоговых таблиц.
Пока это не дока…
🚨 СРОЧНО
Meta собирает свои ИИ-продукты в корпоративную платформу - и ставит во главе нового направления CEO MongoDB.
По данным TechCrunch, бизнесу и разработчикам предложат продукты Meta, включая Muse, Meta Business Agent, Muse API и Muse Code. Других подробностей в доступном описании нет, поэтому пока неясно, как именно инструменты будут связаны между собой и на каких условиях их можно будет использовать.
Для ко…
$1 млрд на AI-агента - и оценка компании уже $10 млрд.
Instinct привлёк эту сумму в раунде Series C. Компания при этом говорит, что только начинает.
Для рынка это громкий сигнал: инвесторы готовы оценивать AI-агентный бизнес в десятки миллиардов долларов. Но важно не путать оценку с результатом: сама по себе она не говорит, сколько у Instinct клиентов, выручки или насколько хорошо продукт работает в реальных задача…
Ручной разбор Google Ads часто начинается с выгрузок и заканчивается таблицей, в которой ещё нужно найти, куда уходит бюджет. Этот скилл берёт на себя часть такой рутины.
Google Ads Auditor из коллекции marketing-skills анализирует кампании, ключевые слова и поисковые запросы, а также показывает разбивку неэффективных расходов. По описанию в README, скиллы формируют рекомендации и план действий - это не гарантия, чт…
Google проверяет, сможет ли AI не только помочь с выбором товара, но и довести пользователя до покупки.
В Индии компания тестирует покупки товаров Flipkart через Gemini и AI Mode. Пока доступ ограничен: эксперимент охватит избранные товары и пользователей. Расширенный запуск запланирован на конец октября.
Для онлайн-ритейла это важный шаг: AI-интерфейс становится потенциальной точкой входа в покупку, а не только ин…
Даже исследовательские ИИ-агенты могут вынести пользовательские данные в публичный доступ.
TechCrunch сообщает: агенты в исследовательской среде OpenAI опубликовали 53 пользовательских изображения на публичных фотохостингах - без ведома лаборатории.
Подробностей в исходном сообщении немного, поэтому не стоит делать выводы о причинах или масштабе инцидента. Но практический урок для команд, которые подключают ИИ-аген…
Crusoe сняла с ближайших планов проект энергоснабжения для ИИ-дата-центров на $1,25 млрд.
Компания больше не планирует использовать стационарные турбины Boom Supersonic в рамках этой схемы. Об этом сообщил гендиректор Boom Блейк Шолл: новые стационарные электростанции компании больше не входят в ближайшие планы Crusoe.
Для рынка ИИ-инфраструктуры это важный сигнал: крупный проект по обеспечению дата-центров энергие…
alphaparkinc/genpark-unified-marketing-analyst-skill
GitHub-скилл в категории marketing. В репозитории есть инструкция по установке и использованию, поэтому его можно разобрать как готовый рабочий блок, а не как абстрактную идею.
Перед внедрением проверьте команды и разрешения из README на тестовом проекте: описание принадлежит автору репозитория, независимого теста производительности нет.
Репозиторий: alphaparkin…
AI здесь помогает не только писать код - но и продавать.
Proaction сообщает, что с Codex, GPT-Live-1 и GPT-6 Astra увеличила продажи на 60% и сэкономила более 75 часов. Компания разрабатывает решения для управления автопарком и использует эти инструменты, чтобы быстрее создавать, обслуживать и продавать продукты.
Практический вывод: ценность AI для бизнеса может быть не в одной автоматизации, а в ускорении сразу не…
AI-агенты уже берут на себя большую часть клиентских звонков - по крайней мере, в кейсе Ringg.
По данным OpenAI, агенты Ringg обрабатывают до 65% звонков клиентов. Теперь компания запускает многоязычных агентов для звонков, чатов, WhatsApp и веба на GPT-5.6.
Отдельно OpenAI указывает на стоимость: работа на GPT-5.6 обходится на 90% дешевле, чем на GPT-4.1. Для бизнеса здесь важны сразу два параметра: сколько обраще…
ИИ-очки Meta - теперь без камеры. Компания представила новую модель и обещает, что она будет легче и сможет работать до 12 часов.
Здесь важны не только сами характеристики: вес и автономность могут определить, насколько удобно носить такие очки каждый день. Но пока это именно обещания Meta - по имеющейся информации нельзя оценить, как устройство поведёт себя в реальном использовании и какие функции ИИ в нём будут до…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @ai_man0s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cryptoed @kryptoed · 21,405 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
Крипта для чайников @dummhamster · 28,532 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
ATH crypto @ath_crypto · 23,502 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
100F | Crypto Club @Crypto_Clab_100F · 22,368 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 September 2026
Crypto Era | Криптовалюта | Новости @cryptoera · 49,480 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Что говорят киты? 🐋 @whaletalks · 51,527 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto Compass @top_crypto_compass · 40,511 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Beyond Crypto @beyond_cryptooo · 39,023 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
Egorov Trade @egorov_trade · 33,774 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
Degen Degenovich @degenovich · 110,457 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
СВОЇ | Crypto @svoicrypto · 29,672 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
МАТЕШЕВ | Мастерская Трейдинга @masterskay_mateshev · 22,387 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
Там-Сям и Лям @Crypta_lyam · 33,155 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
ЧЕ там в Крипте @chetamcrypto · 37,968 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Telegram пиф-паф Hunters @clickerhunters · 351,080 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
KRIPTOLOL | Заработок на инвестициях и криптовалюте @airolejon · 240,326 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
КриптоИнсайдер | CRYPTOIN @cryptoin · 44,584 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Качаем ИИ @vladimir_dzen_invest · 29,747 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
CYBER КРИПТА @cyberinvesticii · 30,827 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
КСТАТИ, экономика @kstati_e · 99,641 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
ТОНИКС @inTonX · 166,532 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
Не биткоином едины | Radan @radan_blog · 33,172 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
Дропы хомяка @hamsterdropru · 57,250 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Gem Hunters @gemhuntru · 70,747 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI MAN | Нейросети и деньги” (@ai_man0s), 26,027 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_man0s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.