Channel
@whaletalks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,819subscribers
-277 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001900312562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whaletalks |
| Description | Команда аналитиков собирает для вас информацию о мнениях и сделках китов крипторынка. Ютуб: https://youtube.com/@whale_talks По рекламе: @demaxcrypto По важным вопросам: @adsgenius Ссылка для вступления - https://t.me/+Z7rvKQRvpmFhM2Fi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whaletalks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 52,819 | -54 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 52,873 | -31 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 52,904 | -33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 52,937 | -33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 52,970 | -21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 52,991 | -41 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 53,032 | -32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 53,064 | -30 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 53,094 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 53,094 | -2 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 53,096 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (3 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 120,351 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
🐳 Ещё один крупный шорт по BTC Инвестор под ником «Gambler 0xff84» открыл короткую позицию на 2000 BTC (приблизительно $125,37 млн) и уже получил нереализованную прибыль в $1,4 млн. Цена ликвидации этой позиции составляет $63 528,92. Посмотрим, как на этот раз сложится ситуация, учитывая, что прошлый шорт был ликвидирован. 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
🐳 Кит сливает HYPE На прошлой неделе крупный инвестор вывел 1,89 млн HYPE ($105 млн) с Hyperliquid. Сегодня он перевел 923 740 монет ($53 млн) на Coinbase и FalconX. Адрес: 0x90B38C5728f184C87EF46479cf7B402d7B98B98a У него осталось 969 600 HYPE ($55,7 млн), а цена уже начала падать. Будьте осторожны с фьючерсами ❗️ 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
🐳 BlackRock продолжает закупаться Сегодня компания вывела с Coinbase 226,5 BTC на сумму $14,4 млн и 3 923 ETH на сумму $7,43 млн. Рынок выглядит напряженно, и инвесторы не уверены в своих ожиданиях 🤔 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
📉 Активность на рынке криптовалют снизилась В июле объем торгов на спотовых рынках криптовалют сократился на 21,7% по сравнению с июнем, достигнув $429 млрд. Это самый низкий уровень с октября 2023 года. В январе объемы торгов достигали $820 млрд, но с тех пор наблюдается снижение. Среди 14 крупнейших бирж снижение объема показали все. Наименьшие потери у Uniswap (-9,8%), Kraken (-13,4%) и Gate (-15,9%), в то время…
🐳 Riot продали 4300 BTC Один из крупнейших майнеров продал монеты на сумму $274 млн для финансирования операционных нужд и расширения дата-центров. Похоже, тоже хотят в ИИ пойти 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
🐳 Кит делает ставку на NASDAQ Адрес 0xb37f открыл лонг с 20x плечом на 1250 токенов xyz:XYZ100 на сумму $37,27 млн. Цена ликвидации: $28 233,46 С учетом постоянного роста фондового рынка, успех кажется вероятным 🤔 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
Необычная транзакция: 1,6 BTC в комиссии В сети Bitcoin зафиксировали необычную транзакцию: 1,60343885 BTC (около $103 000) полностью ушли в комиссию майнеру. Средства не были переведены получателю — майнер забрал всю сумму. Транзакция была включена в блок 962 142, добытый SpiderPool, и составила около 88% всей комиссии блока. Это произошло из-за ошибки при формировании транзакции или сбоя автоматизации. Вернуть ср…
🚬 Очень рискованный шорт Трейдер открыл крупную сделку на 2136 BTC ($136 млн), став крупнейшим "медведем" на рынке. Цена ликвидации близка — $64 592,3. Заработает или ликвиднется? 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
🐋 $ETH киты также закупают 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
🐳 BlackRock купила монеты на $65млн В ночь на сегодня компания приобрела 1019,27 BTC на сумму $64,64 млн и 301,77 ETH за $570 тыс., выведя их с Coinbase Prime. 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
🐋 Кит внёс 60K $HYPE на Hyperliquid и продал 31,56K за $1,77M 0xDeB0B9c1E1B234981c4731Ea92bC6B2f31AadeE2 🐋 Что говорят киты? | 🔥 Bitunix
Торговля биткоином вернулась к уровням 2019 года Объём торгов биткоином на спотовом рынке упал до минимальных значений с начала 2019 года. Приток средств в биржевые фонды (ETF) и поступление биткоинов на биржи остаются низкими, что указывает на слабую активность институциональных инвесторов. Такая ситуация может усилить риск продолжения коррекции BTC и его выхода из бокового движения в сторону снижения. Тем не мене…
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @whaletalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 750,288 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что говорят киты? 🐋” (@whaletalks), 52,819 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whaletalks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.