Почему ты еще не подписан на канал ВАЛЮТНЫЕ СЫНЫ Копейка в плюс, лучше чем доллар в минус. Канал по работе с валютным и крипто рынком. Без красивых слов сразу по делу: после подписки ты получаешь доступ в две приватки одна по форексу вторая по крипте с четкими и понятными сетапами. ВСТУПИТЬ В КАНАЛ ВСТУПИТЬ В КАНАЛ ВСТУПИТЬ В КАНАЛ Смотришь что в привате сразу, а не греешься как гой. Если не выдадут доступ в прив…

Channel
ЧЕ там в Крипте
@chetamcrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,505subscribers
-2,026 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001989472099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chetamcrypto |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chetamcrypto |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 37,505 | -115 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 37,620 | -111 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 37,731 | -237 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 37,968 | -211 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 38,179 | -47 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 38,226 | -61 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 38,287 | -32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 38,319 | -65 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 38,384 | -91 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 38,475 | -126 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 38,601 | -40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 38,641 | -43 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 38,684 | -51 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 38,735 | -32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 38,767 | -42 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 38,809 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 38,845 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 38,861 | -22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 38,883 | -39 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 38,922 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.20%
- avg views ÷ 37,505 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,330
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.091%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (12 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 11,630 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 05:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 06s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 22 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 19 | 11.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 10.7% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 10.7% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 9.52% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 8.93% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 7.14% | |
| 🏆 | 9 | 5.36% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 5.36% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 4.76% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 4.17% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 3.57% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.595% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Кристина открыла второй канал. В основном канале у нее уже слишком много людей, поэтому новые сделки она будет публиковать в своем VIP канале. Статистика випки +400% за сентябрь 👇 Доступ по ссылке: https://t.me/+QUmN_evIahpkMzA0 #промо
Даем каждому доступ в новый вип канал, но в отличии от других каналов, доступ в него будет полностью бесплатный. С одним правилом, попасть в него можно будет только первым 250 человек. Заходите: https://t.me/+NnfBryLemw45MzNi В среднем 90% всей инсайдерской информации админы крупных каналов берут с этой випки. Думаем, что это идеально подойдет самым активным читателям и трейдерам. Вступайте: https://t.me/+NnfBryLe…
😀 Че там у роботов? Они уже реально выходят на работу У Agility Robotics роботы Digit уже накатали больше 65к часов на реальных объектах Amazon, Toyota, GXO и других компаний. На одном складе GXO они перетаскали больше 100к контейнеров с точностью около 98%. То есть роботы уже не просто красиво машут руками на выставках Илона Маска. Они реально воркают. А как доказать, что робот действительно сделал то, за что ем…
🔉 Че там у Whale? Whale запустили реферальный турнир с призовым фондом $7,777, и пока там почти пусто. 🔖 Че по фарму? 📏 Инвайтим друга по своей рефке 📏 За его первый депозит получаем 10 поинтов 📏 За второй депозит - еще 20 поинтов 📏 За каждый $1, который реферал заработает на платформе, дают 50 поинтов ⚠️ Важно: Считаются только рефералы, приглашенные после старта турнира. Когда вы сами зарегистрировались на Wha…
⚡1❤🔥1🏆1
☺️Не дай бог жиза!
🤣4👍1💯1
⚡ Че там у роботов? Konnex собирает поинты до TGE Пока все фармят очередной L2, вот вам история с другой стороны рынка. Konnex строит сеть, где физические роботы находят работу и получают за нее деньги. Выглядит так: 📏заказчик кидает задание, 📏ИИ-модели соревнуются, кто решит его лучше, 📏валидаторы судят этот батл, 📏победившее решение уходит на реального робота. Дальше самое интересное. Сеть не верит на слово: с…
🤩3❤2🏆2
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡️ Залетает в нишу AI Security Не секрет, что с безопасностью у ИИ пока всё довольно грустно. ✏️При этом сами модели уже неплохо справляются с поиском уязвимостей в приложениях. Именно эту проблему и решает V12sec, и судя по первым тестам, их ИИ-агент очень быстро находит баги, ошибки и потенциальные уязвимости в системе. Проект находится на очень ранней стадии, всего около 7 тыс. подписчиков в Twitter, но при эт…
⚡5❤4❤🔥1🏆1
ЧЕ там в Крипте pinned a photo
Ну реально 😂
🤣13💯1🤔1
⚡️ Воркаем тестнет StripChain под потенциальный дроп StripChain — протокол для межсетевого взаимодействия, который позволяет разработчикам передавать данные между разными блокчейнами. Проект привлек $10 млн от Mechanism Capital, Hypersphere, Sora Ventures, Ascensive, Hyperithm и других фондов. ✏️Недавно команда запустила публичный тестнет v1. В нем можно клеймить тестовые токены, минтить синтетические активы, бр…
⚡4❤🔥3❤1🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @chetamcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@alexatamcrypto · 38,519#1
@eeusd · 1,106,203#2
@crypadvis · 93,063#3
@playweb4 · 140,842#4
@crypto_Iemon · 73,467#5
@crypta · 525,588#6
@hamsterdropru · 56,490#7
@cryptoera · 48,779#8
@tu_airdrops_daily · 62,762#9
@cryptoniumb · 18,890#10
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 106,472#11
@gemhuntru · 69,217#12
@EasyInvestCrypt · 102,915#13
@CryptoPayk · 152,012#14
@Crypta_lyam · 32,448#15
@semenchuk · 1,199,757#16
@hamster_kombat · 20,354,943#17
@invest_zonaa · 886,592#18
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,104,292#19
@cryptospec · 19,267#20
@thetamaxxing · 35,951#21
@rilcrypto · 73,044#22
@RustonCrypto · 21,593#23
@Anton_cryptoo · 141,376#24
@walt_news_cis · 1,106,249#25
@freee_crypts · 13,280#26
@crypt_investing · 64,704#27
@crypto_vestnic · 204,954#28
@taptoncrypto · 18,176#29
@ai_man0s · 25,756#30
@eduardinvest · 1,311,536#31
@clickerhunters · 339,830#32
@vladimir_dzen_invest · 29,401#33
@beyond_cryptooo · 38,019#34
@cryptorun · 125,738#35
@finansist_busines · 609,572#36
@degenovich · 107,956#37
@svoicrypto · 29,260#38
@vestirussia · 949,991#39
@crypto_jeman · 649,114#40
@vincrypto · 7,240#41
@cryptodaily · 84,851#42
@ath_crypto · 23,330#43
@crypto_talk_channel · 9,701#44
@bitochekvko · 41,276#45
@notatraderrr · 136,298#46
@Coin_Post · 288,076#47
@mem_notcoin · 81,614#48
@HanibalCrypto · 20,288#49
@cryptoin · 44,195#50
@whaletalks · 51,171#51
@polunintrade7 · 512,322#52
@egorov_trade · 33,571#53
@walt_news · 3,423,382#54
@Kripto_Azbuk · 287,401#55
@lostdogscoru · 212,389#56
@Cats_housewtf · 7,537,926#57
@zicelaqo · 163,038#58
@stukach_trading · 306,178#59
@crypt_income · 73,567#60
@trade_soul · 73,413#61
@radan_blog · 32,700#62
@Crypto_Clab_100F · 21,865#63
@dogs · 6,827,445#64
@notcoin · 8,295,188#65
@blumcrypto · 13,656,768#66
@catizenann · 3,457,381#67
@catapult_extreme · 8,083,779#68
@hotonnear · 4,505,230#69
@cultofnot · 1,004,534#70
@theyescoin · 5,457,343#71
@trendingapps · 3,696,674#72
@pocketfi · 1,740,815#73
@gram · 6,487,517#74
@tapswapai · 10,073,402#75
@tonstationgames · 3,080,377#76
@builders · 3,341,051#77
@svoiua · 203,876#78
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,175,939#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptoniumb · 18,890
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 October 2026
@vladimir_dzen_invest · 29,401
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
@cryptoinform · 20,388
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
@cryptospec · 19,267
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 October 2026
@Crypta_lyam · 32,448
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@airobots_news · 43,691
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@EasyInvestCrypt · 102,915
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 106,472
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@crypt_investing · 64,704
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@clickerhunters · 339,830
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@alexatamcrypto · 38,519
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
@HanibalCrypto · 20,288
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
@crypto_Iemon · 73,467
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@cryptoera · 48,779
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@thetamaxxing · 35,951
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
@gemhuntru · 69,217
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@whaletalks · 51,171
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@cryptorun · 125,738
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
@degenovich · 107,956
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@ai_man0s · 25,756
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
@kryptoed · 21,273
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
@radan_blog · 32,700
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@egorov_trade · 33,571
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
@masterskay_mateshev · 22,061
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧЕ там в Крипте” (@chetamcrypto), 37,505 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chetamcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.