🇮🇷Иран требует расследования против Трампа Иран призывает Конгресс США провести расследование в отношении бывшего президента Дональда Трампа и его семьи по подозрению в незаконной торговле акциями и манипуляции фондовым рынком. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix

Channel
КриптоИнсайдер | CRYPTOIN
@cryptoin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,806subscribers
-221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001834988286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoin |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoin |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 45,806 | -29 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 45,835 | -30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 45,865 | -30 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 45,895 | -28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 45,923 | -35 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 45,958 | -38 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 45,996 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 46,027 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 46,027 | first reading |
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.87%
- avg views ÷ 45,806 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 856
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 77,867 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 31s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🎁Илон Маск представил Grok 4.6 Илон Маск недавно представил новую версию Grok 4.6. Этот продукт практически сравнялся с Claude Fable 5 по нескольким важным показателям. "Умный, быстрый и потрясающе выгодный за свои деньги!", — отметил Маск. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
🤯 Кто-то случайно заплатил комиссию в размере 1.6 BTC ($103 000) за одну транзакцию. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
💸 Необычная комиссия в 1.6 BTC Пользователь уплатил комиссию в размере 1.6 BTC. Было ли это сделано случайно или намеренно — неизвестно. Однако часто такие случаи связывают с «нелепым отмыванием денег через подконтрольные майнинг пулы». 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
👛 Перемещение 85 BTC спустя 13 лет Биткойны, которые оставались без движения более 13 лет, были перемещены всего час назад. Изначальная инвестиция составляла всего $13, а теперь прибыль составила примерно $5,4 млн, что соответствует росту на 475 056%. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
▶️ Обзор рынка Попытка локального выкупа и ретест зеркал. 💰BTC 64 132$ 💠ETH 1 911$ Индекс страха 26 Индекс альтсезона 50 Коэффициент лонг/шорт 49/51 Доминация биткоина 59.10% После импульсной уценки рынок нащупал поддержку у нижних границ и сформировал попытку локального отскока. Покупатели поджимают цену обратно к пробитым ранее уровням. ▪️BTC: Протестировал поддержку $63400, забрал ликвидность и отскочил. Глав…
📈 Возможный прорыв зоны сопротивления Цена снова пытается подняться к зоне сопротивления и может быть на грани её прорыва. Если зона будет преодолена и недельная свеча закроется выше, это может быть хорошим сигналом для начала бычьего движения. Будем следить за дополнительными подтверждениями, чтобы укрепить наш прогноз. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
Швейцарская Лавка Давно хотели приобрести часы именитых брендов таких как Rolex / Audemars Piguet / Patek Philippe и др.🇨🇭 Но не хотите ждать очереди в пару лет ? Тогда вам в наш бутик . У нас строго оригинал (любые проверки) . К нам обращаются такие знаменитости как Оксана Самойлова , Михаил Литвин , Ксения Собчак и многие другие . Так же выкупаем ваши часы. https://t.me/+IvjYGxghFUs2MDZi
🤔Мировой рекордсмен по ликвидациям Machi Big Brother вновь потерпел неудачу За последние сутки его позиция в ETH была ликвидирована дважды на сумму $2,5 млн. После этого у него осталось примерно $180,000 маржи, но он уже начал восстанавливать позицию. В прошлом году его доход составлял $44,8 млн, но затем началась череда неудач. За почти год он получил около 400 ликвидаций и оказался в минусе на $83,2 млн. Тем не…
😘В Китае открыли бар для вайбкодеров В этом баре, заказывая пиво, посетители получают безлимитный доступ к DeepSeek. Также предлагается годовой абонемент за 198 юаней с бесплатным AGI-пивом. На экранах бара транслируются вакансии от ИИ-стартапов, что позволяет не только покодить, но и сразу найти работу. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
🚫 Яндекс Пэй недоступен в App Store Сообщается, что приложение Яндекс Пэй убрано из App Store. Подобная ситуация недавно произошла с ВК, и теперь пользователи беспокоятся, что следом может уйти и Яндекс Go. Apple вынуждает пользователей переходить на Android. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер | 🔥 Bitunix
Производительность Solana впечатляет Пропускная способность блокчейна Solana достигла 2000 транзакций в секунду, обработав 174 миллиона транзакций за последние 24 часа. Для сравнения, всего две недели назад сеть Gram снизила скорость до 200 транзакций в секунду, хотя ранее Дуров заявлял, что блокчейн TON является самым быстрым. Как видно, Solana обошла конкурентов в скорости обработки транзакций. 🦾 КриптоИнсайдер…
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @cryptoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cryptoin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,006,120 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@clickerhunters · 373,472
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@stukach_trading · 322,087
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоИнсайдер | CRYPTOIN” (@cryptoin), 45,806 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.