Коротко, про Опус 5.5 – лучшая модель на рынке, на сегодня, я пока снова клод чувак ☕️

Channel
Качаем ИИ
@vladimir_dzen_invest
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,989subscribers
-1,152 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001730470767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vladimir_dzen_invest |
| Description | Место, где вместе прокачиваем навыки в AI, разбираем инструменты и начинаем зарабатывать на новых технологиях. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vladimir_dzen_invest |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 29,989 | -47 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 30,036 | -48 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 30,084 | -40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 30,124 | -79 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 30,203 | -120 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 30,323 | -70 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 30,393 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:23 | 30,419 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:33 | 30,459 | -33 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 30,492 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 30,529 | -31 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 30,560 | -40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 30,600 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 30,629 | -44 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 30,673 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 30,697 | -49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 30,746 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 30,767 | -43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 30,810 | -29 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 30,839 | first reading |
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.448%
- avg views ÷ 29,989 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 134
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.36%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (25 June 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,091 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,820
- Videos
- ≈222
- Links
- ≈676
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 17s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 41.5% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 29.2% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 13.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Люди только успели отменить свои 8 20х подписок на Клод в связи с выходом AGI, то есть Астры, а тут снова нужно отменять свои 6 Кодекс 20х подписок и переходить обратно на Опус. По моим задачам, он рвет любую из существующих моделей включая Астру и Фейбл, стоит значительно дешевле и просто отрыв башки в дизайне и видео. Напоминаю, что лабы сегодня имеют модели как минимум на одно полное поколение круче внутри (то е…
Каждый кадр на видео выше сделан Клодом с помощью JavaScript. Через 2, максимум - 3, поколения моделей (новое поколение каждые 2 мес в среднем), большинство игровых студий, 3D контентщиков и контентных бизнесов останется не у дел. Останется ценной только дистрибуция и бренд, но у большинства этого как раз нет. Выводы: 1. Нас ждет феерический крутое будущее, где у каждого зрителя, геймера и ребенка будет персонали…
👍1
Anthropic раздаёт пользователям Claude Code кредиты на $100 и $250. Раздачу устроили в честь выхода Cloud Sessions из превью. Подписчикам Pro дают $100, а Max все $250. Причем кредит идёт отдельно от обычных лимитов и работает только для облачных сессий. Забрать нужно до 7 октября командой / claim-credit в терминале или по ссылке из официального релиза.
Вышли Opus 5.5 (2х дешевле и круче Fable) и GPT-6 Sol (в 2 раза дешевле 5.6). То есть обе модели одновременно значительно круче и дешевле своих предшественников (а не прошло и 2 месяцев). Вот так примерно это и будет происходить. Мир не перевернется и не остановится. OpenAI в посте говорят что планируют работать с топ математиками и университетами, чтобы выпускать больше доказательств и решений в более системной фо…
👏2
Ожидаемо, модель OpenAI не остановилась на решении лишь одной из проблем математики. Более того, они заявляют (я бы оценил шанс что это окажется даже частично неправдой как <1%), что модель решила больше 100 открытых значительных проблем в разных областях математики. Параллельно, внутри компании (и не только OAI, но и Гугл и Антропики) в значительной степени смогли автоматизировать процесс проведения экспериментов д…
Posted without readable text
👍2
погонял новую штуку - JEV от TypeSafe AI это не chat-модель, она не генерирует текст, а сразу отдает решение с вероятностью как работает: даешь ей контекст (state) и вопрос с заранее заданными вариантами ответа она в один проход возвращает choice / score / вероятность да-нет никакого текста, никакого парсинга на твоей стороне протестировал на реальной задаче - скоринг 392 контактов под ICP TrustedRails весь список…
Posted without readable text
Там кстати в ИИ скачек случился интересный, новая модель JEV - https://typesafe.ai/ Фишка в том что модель не генерирует ответы, ничего не пишет, а просто исполняет И делает это в 200 раз быстрее чем текущие AI. Такая скорость позволяет внедрять ИИ прям внутрь многих процессов по ходу выполнения. Пространство применения огромное
На выходных с друзьями сделали небольшие зум-дебаты на тему того как ИИ влияет на мир и человечество. Ниже список самых интересных тезисов, на которых мы сошлись и согласились. AI может сделать интеллект доступным всем, а власть сконцентрировать у единиц. Открытая модель не даёт тебе электростанцию, датацентр и возможность занять $100 млрд. Если интеллектуальную работу можно масштабировать вычислениями, главным преи…
👍2
Главный риск ИИ сегодня - действовать недостаточно амбициозно. Потратить следующие три года на вещь, которая недостаточно большая. Всё, что ещё недавно было «хорошей идеей для стартапа», становится дешевле реализовать буквально каждый месяц. Я не верю, что бизнес, в котором продукт и конкурентное отличие это код (не deep tech) вообще имеет смысла. Написать продукт, сделать дизайн, провести исследование, запустить п…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @vladimir_dzen_invest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypto_Iemon · 75,063#1
@cryptospec · 19,584#2
@cryptoniumb · 19,119#3
@alexatamcrypto · 38,802#4
@chetamcrypto · 37,968#5
@whaletalks · 51,715#6
@cryptoin · 44,739#7
@egorov_trade · 33,928#8
@cryptorun · 128,702#9
@dzen_invest · 2,753#10
@eeusd · 1,135,233#11
@invest_zonaa · 909,960#12
@svoicrypto · 29,890#13
@gemhuntru · 70,747#14
@crypt_investing · 64,607#15
@playweb4 · 143,104#16
@polunintrade7 · 525,189#17
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,171,582#18
@crypadvis · 95,402#19
@CryptoPayk · 154,380#20
@Kripto_Azbuk · 293,747#21
@stukach_trading · 309,957#22
@hamsterdropru · 57,537#23
@crypto_vestnic · 208,013#24
@clickerhunters · 351,080#25
@crypta · 538,231#26
@Anton_cryptoo · 143,782#27
@finansist_busines · 620,476#28
@cryptoera · 49,480#29
@tu_airdrops_daily · 63,941#30
@eduardinvest · 1,354,680#31
@ai_man0s · 26,298#32
@HanibalCrypto · 20,723#33
@radan_blog · 33,369#34
@vincrypto · 7,330#35
@beyond_cryptooo · 39,023#36
@cryptodaily · 85,610#37
@RustonCrypto · 21,912#38
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#39
@Coin_Post · 291,333#40
@ath_crypto · 23,660#41
@duck_crypto · 9,713#42
@thetamaxxing · 36,578#43
@bitochekvko · 41,913#44
@notatraderrr · 138,917#45
@masterskay_mateshev · 22,387#46
@rilcrypto · 75,425#47
@mem_notcoin · 83,191#48
@Crypta_lyam · 33,155#49
@EasyInvestCrypt · 105,745#50
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 109,220#51
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#52
@notcoin · 8,573,554#53
@catizenann · 3,550,802#54
@catapult_extreme · 8,398,685#55
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#56
@cultofnot · 1,021,161#57
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#58
@trendingapps · 3,784,156#59
@zicelaqo · 165,921#60
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#61
@crypt_income · 75,338#62
@Sanek_Kharkiv · 150,212#63
@vestirussia · 986,059#64
@freee_crypts · 13,488#65
@investkingyru · 1,728,086#66
@billion_wallet · 245,958#67
@dogs · 7,065,215#68
@lostdogscoru · 215,203#69
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#70
@svoiua · 206,933#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@egorov_trade · 33,928
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
@whaletalks · 51,715
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@chetamcrypto · 37,968
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@airobots_news · 44,287
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@trade_soul · 701
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypt_investing · 64,607
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@cryptoin · 44,739
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@wefi_announcements · 60,115
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
@cryptorun · 128,702
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
@Crypta_lyam · 33,155
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@crypto_Iemon · 75,063
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@EasyInvestCrypt · 105,745
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@Crypta_Pashkevicha · 109,220
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Качаем ИИ” (@vladimir_dzen_invest), 29,989 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladimir_dzen_invest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.