Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 44 days, net -172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,810–12,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:39
11,850
-4
17 Sept 2026, 00:59
11,854
+7
14 Sept 2026, 23:19
11,847
+4
13 Sept 2026, 06:21
11,843
+1
11 Sept 2026, 09:42
11,842
-1
8 Sept 2026, 18:56
11,843
-10
5 Sept 2026, 09:58
11,853
-6
3 Sept 2026, 10:09
11,859
+5
2 Sept 2026, 01:17
11,854
-7
30 Aug 2026, 23:14
11,861
+14
29 Aug 2026, 20:23
11,847
-2
27 Aug 2026, 16:04
11,849
+11
26 Aug 2026, 15:24
11,838
-2
25 Aug 2026, 18:45
11,840
-10
24 Aug 2026, 18:46
11,850
+7
23 Aug 2026, 03:43
11,843
-12
21 Aug 2026, 18:06
11,855
-5
20 Aug 2026, 14:52
11,860
-1
19 Aug 2026, 14:33
11,861
-17
18 Aug 2026, 14:54
11,878
first reading
Engagement
457 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 11,850 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
202 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
204
of 457 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
457 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
258,882
Reactions total
14,495
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 56s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34,940 reactions across 454 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,392
41.2%
👍
6,824
19.5%
😁
3,575
10.2%
🔥
1,663
4.76%
👌
1,623
4.65%
💔
1,616
4.63%
👎
1,318
3.77%
👏
1,000
2.86%
🤬
946
2.71%
😭
581
1.66%
😍
367
1.05%
😱
363
1.04%
🤔
269
0.77%
🤯
188
0.538%
🤷♂
66
0.189%
🙏
65
0.186%
🏆
59
0.169%
🫡
25
0.072%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 454 of the 457 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 457 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 454 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saat_akharozaman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 457 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
من وظیفم گفتن مطالب هست
حالا ممکن ی نفر تاثیر بگیره ممکن صد نفر ممکن هزار نفر یا اصلا هیچکس
اونش با خودتونه ، من وظیفه دارم چیزی ک باید رو بگم خیلی گیر نیستم رو این عدد بازیا و دیده شدنا و فلان
گناه ک البته الان گناه حساب نمیکنن و میگن سبک زندگیه و هرکی مدل زندگیشو خودش انتخاب میکنه و این شر ورا ، خیلی خیلی زیاد شده ، سعی کنید #پاکسازی کنید ، سعی کنید #توبه کنید ، واقعا دارید ظلم میکنید به خودتون ، بخاطر دو قرون پول…
ی بدبختی دیگه ایم ک برای مردم پیش اومده ، گسترش این مکتبای جدید ، این تفکرات جدید ، برنامه های جدید ، یوگا ، انواع مدیتیشن ، جذب انرژی و هزار روش و تفکر دیگه که هیچی ندارن جز اینکه ورود شیاطین به زندگی و ذهن و روح شمارو آزاد و راحت و ساده میکنن
قطعا وقتی وارد این داستانا میشید در ابتدا ب ارامشم میرسید ولی این ارامشا تلقینی و موقته و بعدش دچار کلی داستان و مشکل میشید که دلیلش راه یافتن شیاطین به زندگیاتونه
@saat_akh…
گناه به طرز عجیبی برای اکثریت عادی شده ، از حروم حلالش بگیرید تا محرم نامحرم تا روابط آزاد جنسی ، تا نوع پوشش افراد و هر مدل گناهی که فرض کنید ، برا همین شیاطین خیلی راحت میتونن تو خونه های شما ، تو ذهن شما رفت امد داشته باشن و تاثیر گذار باشن
کافیه ی نگاه ب حجم بالای مشکلات شخصیتون بندازین ، مشکلات زناشویی ، خانوادگی ، مشکلاتی ک ناخودآگاه تو زندگیتون هی پیش میاد و .....
اینا تماما بخاطر اثرات گناه و قدرت یافتن شیاط…
راستی ی مطلبیم از ظهر میخواستم بگم هی یادم میرفت
امروز با ی عزیزی حرف میزدم نکته خوبی اشاره کردن ، اینکه قدرت شیاطین زیاد شده ، به راحتی تو زندگیاتون تاثیرات قوی میذارن ، تو ذهنتون ، تصمیم گیریاتون ، ایجاد مشکلات مختلف براتون و ......
دلیلشم گسترش گناه در سطح باور نکردنی تو کشور تو بخش های مختلف هست ، خودتونو ایمن کنید با ذکر و خوندن قرآن و مسائل معنوی ، شاید بشه گفت تو قوی ترین حالت خودشون از لحاظ اثر گذاری هستن شی…
اگه از فرصتایی ک خدا بهمون داده بود استفاده میکردیم ، کارمون به سختی هایی که پیش رو داریم ، نمیرسید و خیلی زودتر از اینا جمع شده بود ، چه از لحاظ نظامی چه اقتصادی ...
@saat_akharozaman
روبیو، وزیر خارجه آمریکا:
یادداشت تفاهم با ایران منقضی شده است و دیگر به آن باز نخواهیم گشت
پ ن : اگه فک میکنید حتی با این جمله هم مسئولین ما بیخیال این تفاهم نامه میشن سخت در اشتباهید !
الان میگن درسته امریکا گفته دیگه به تفاهمنامه برنمیگردیم ولی ما پایبند بهش میمونیم تا امریکا از رو بره و بهش برگرده ، همچین مسئولین وفاداری داریم ...
@saat_akharozaman
ترامپ دیگه کارش ب جایی رسیده که داره مردم رو ب آشوب خیابونی دعوت میکنه !
اثرات حضورتون در خیابونو درک کنید چون اکه خیابون رو خالی کنید قطعا باید با آشولگرای مسلح درگیر شیم وسط خیابونای خودمون و پشت بندش هم حمله نظامی همه جانبه ...
@saat_akharozaman
تو همچین وضعیت اقتصادی مطمینم میکم خیالتون راحت ورق اقتصاد ایران برمیگرده ، یعنی تو زمانی که همه دارن دم از ناامیدی میزنن و فلان
درسته ک طی کردن این مدت یخورده سخته ( از یخورده ، یخورده بیشتر )
ولی خب انچنان طولانی نیس یا اونجوری نیس ک فک کنید دیگه درست نمیشه
ورق برمیگرده ...
@saat_akharozaman
Showing the 12 most recent of 457 posts we hold for @saat_akharozaman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@saat_akharozaman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Satvica Holistic Academy @satvica · 30,525 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
امام مهدی عج @emammahdi · 32,391 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
ظهور نزدیک است ... @Zohour_I12 · 30,201 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
آنتی ایلومیناتی @antiluminati · 31,980 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
علم زمان @time_zaman · 23,374 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
استاد محمد شجاعی @Ostad_Shojae · 90,390 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
پاف @pafiha · 35,055 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
🔸صائب بن مالک🔸"باید برخاست" @mahdaviatakhbar · 63,071 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
مسلمان تی وی | Mosalman Tv @mosalman_tv · 22,425 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
🔸کیسان ابوعمره🔸 @mahdaviatsiasi · 172,030 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
کانال رسمی استاد کاوه @ostadkavehchanel · 45,046 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
جنگ جهانی سوم WW3 @worldwar3ir · 40,160 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 August 2026
امپراتوری مقاومت @mojahedin_iran · 28,467 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
برفراز ایران @Astrology_futurology · 85,333 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
محمد مهدی بابایی - اخبار جنگ @m_Mahdibaba · 138,854 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
سپاه پاسداران @sepahp_ir · 35,772 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
دیدگاه نو @didgah257 · 77,173 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
آقای تحلیلگر 🇮🇷✌️ @mrtahlilgar · 91,296 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
نظامی ترین @nezamitarin · 86,109 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
RaefipourFans @raefipourfans · 64,483 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
ناب جهادی @nabjahadiii · 53,194 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
آرشیو سخنرانیهای استاد رائفیپور @Masafbox · 79,341 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ساعت آخرالزمان” (@saat_akharozaman), 11,850 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saat_akharozaman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.