Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Wake up

@coronaplan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,798subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278259119
TypeChannel
Username@coronaplan
Created28 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coronaplan

Growth

1,7961,7981,7977 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,797 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,798 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,796–1,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:421,798+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:111,797+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:461,796no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:371,796first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.70%
avg views ÷ 1,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,769
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 46s
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1851.4%
👌514.3%
💔514.3%
25.71%
❤‍🔥25.71%
🤔25.71%
😱12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC105 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨ قبل از اینکه خودتان را مبتلا به *افسردگی* و کمبود اعتماد به نفس بدانید، مطمئن شوید که شما در محاصره افراد احمق قرار ندارید. @coronaplan

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

یک سیستم عصبی آرام می‌تواند یکی از بهترین درمان‌های زیبایی باشد. استرس مزمن فقط بر احساس شما تأثیر نمی‌گذارد - بلکه می‌تواند روی صورت شما نیز ظاهر شود. افزایش هورمون‌های استرس با التهاب، تشدید آکنه، اختلال در عملکرد سد پوستی، کند شدن بهبود زخم و اختلال در تولید کلاژن مرتبط دانسته شده است. بسیاری از افراد همچنین در دوره‌های طولانی استرس، متوجه تیرگی پوست، حلقه‌های تیره، تنش در فک و پیشانی و افزایش ریزش مو می‌شوند.

👍3

7 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

خطرات استفاده از لامپ‌های LED: 🔹 تأثیرات منفی بر سلامت_روان کاهش تمرکز و افزایش پراکندگی حواس 🔹 احتمال آسیب به بینایی 🔹 تأثیرات منفی بر خواب 📊 نتایج یک آزمایش علمی: 👩‍🔬 در یک تحقیق که روی چند گروه دانش‌آموزی انجام شد، مشخص گردید که در کلاس‌هایی با لامپ‌های رشته‌ای، #تمرکز دانش‌آموزان بیشتر بود، اما در کلاس‌هایی که از لامپ‌های LED استفاده شد، عدم تمرکز و حواس‌پرتی به‌وضوح مشاهده شد! 📌 نکته مهم: ترجمه صحیح جمله اول ز

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC80 viewsread 7 August 2026

🧠 فراموشی؛ استرس، افزایش سن یا زوال عقل؟ چگونه تفاوت را تشخیص دهیم؟ همه ما گاهی چیزی را فراموش می‌کنیم، اما همه فراموشی‌ها نشانه زوال عقل نیستند. ✅ اگر علت استرس باشد: • تمرکز کاهش می‌یابد و اطلاعات را درست ثبت نمی‌کنید. • با کاهش استرس، حافظه معمولاً بهتر می‌شود. ✅ اگر به افزایش سن مربوط باشد: • گاهی نام افراد یا محل گذاشتن وسایل را فراموش می‌کنید، اما بعداً به یادتان می‌آید. • انجام کارهای روزمره و استقلال فردی حفظ

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📺 تلویزیون، مغز ما را به نوعی "خشک" می‌کند 🧠 محققان کشف کرده‌اند که تماشای طولانی مدت تلویزیون در جوانی، منجر به تخریب غیرقابل برگشت ساختار مغز پس از سال‌ها می‌شود. مصرف غیرفعال ویدیو، ذهن را آموزش نمی‌دهد. بدون تحریک فکری، نورون‌ها ضعیف می‌شوند و این امر، روند پیری سیستم عصبی را تسریع می‌کند. در طول 20 سال تحقیق، ثابت شده است که بیننده‌های دائمی تلویزیون، در دوران پیری، مقدار بیشتری از بافت خاکستری مغز خود را از

👍2🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅ اسکن‌های مغزی نشون میده مغز کودکانی که در خانواده‌های پرالتهاب (اهل جر و بحث، خشونت و بی‌توجهی) زندگی می‌کنن، دچار تغییراتی میشه که شبیه به تغییرات مغزی سربازان پس از بازگشت از میدان جنگه @coronaplan

💔2❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟢نتیجه یک بررسی: ChatGPT در میان چت‌بات‌ها بیشترین اخبار جعلی را تولید می‌کند 🔹بررسی‌های جدید نشان می‌دهد چت‌بات‌های هوش مصنوعی به‌سادگی اخبار جعلی و تصاویر ساختگی تولید می‌کنند. در این میان ChatGPT ضعیف‌ترین عملکرد را داشته و به‌راحتی سدهای امنیتی را برای ساخت اخبار دروغین دور می‌زند. 🔹سایر ابزارها مانند جمینای و کوپایلوت نیز محتوای ساختگی تولید کرده‌اند، اما کیفیت پایین و وجود برچسب خاص این موضوع را قابل تشخیص می

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

به محض اینکه آن تلویزیون را روشن می‌کنید، تحت تأثیر کنترل و دستکاری افکار خود توسط آن‌ها قرار می‌گیرید. همچنین، در زبان لاتین، کلمه "دولت" به معنای "کنترل ذهن" است. این کلمه از ترکیب "guvernare" (به معنای "کنترل کردن") و "mentis" (به معنای "ذهن") تشکیل شده است، به این معنی که "کنترل ذهن". @coronaplan

👌1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اینترنت، موجودیتی بسیار بزرگ، قدرتمند و در عین حال بی‌معنا، 🌐 که برای برخی، به یک جایگزین ایده‌آل برای زندگی تبدیل شده است. فضای وسیعی از امکانات، که می‌توان در آن گم شد یا خود را پیدا کرد. 💻 @coronaplan

👍2👌1

6 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC208 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔺 هیچوقت موضوع سلامتی شما نبوده، سیستم تمام تلاشش را کرده که انسانهایی بیمار و مطیع بسازد. بسیاری از چیزهایی که از ابتدا آموختید اشتباه بوده و تماماً هدفمند تا هیچگاه واقعیت را ندانید. @coronaplan

👌2👍2

6 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇬🇧 بریتانیا. 🐛🐛🐛 🪳 در انگلستان، تولید کرم‌های خوراکی آغاز شده است. گفته می‌شود این غذای جدید و فوق‌العاده برای انسان‌ها، طعم مرغ دارد. پیش‌بینی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که بازار حشرات از ۱۱۲ میلیون دلار در سال ۲۰۱۹ به ۱.۵ میلیارد پوند در سال ۲۰۲۶ خواهد رسید، که این رشد به لطف سرمایه‌گذاری‌های کلان از سوی نخبگان و دولت است. فقط با دیدنشان، احساس منزجر شدن می‌کنم. 🤮 @coronaplan

1❤‍🔥1💔1

6 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC132 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

چرا فائوچی 50 سال در قدرت باقی ماند؟" رابرت اف. کندی جونیور ادعا می‌کند که پنج دهه حضور آنتونی فائوچی در راس موسسه ملی بهداشت (NIH) نتیجه‌ی دفاع از سلامت عمومی نبوده، بلکه دفاع از منافع صنعت داروسازی بوده است. او اشاره می‌کند که دانشمندانی که به این سیستم اعتراض داشتند، با عواقب منفی برای حرفه خود مواجه شدند، در حالی که کسانی که از رویکرد موجود حمایت می‌کردند، پیشرفت کردند. "اگر می‌خواهید در NIH یا هر یک از این سا

👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @coronaplan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 796,884 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wake up” (@coronaplan), 1,798 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coronaplan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.