Channel
@CatturdFanClub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,430subscribers
-125 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001447597072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CatturdFanClub |
| Created | 11 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CatturdFanClub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 23,430 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 23,435 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 23,453 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 23,477 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 23,496 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 23,519 | -29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 23,548 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 23,555 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,099 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 3,196 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,258 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 834 | 9.17% | |
| 🤡 | 701 | 7.70% | |
| 🤮 | 677 | 7.44% | |
| 💩 | 605 | 6.65% | |
| 🤣 | 591 | 6.50% | |
| 🤬 | 299 | 3.29% | |
| 🥰 | 207 | 2.27% | |
| 👏 | 183 | 2.01% | |
| 🤪 | 147 | 1.62% | |
| 😁 | 137 | 1.51% | |
| 🙏 | 100 | 1.10% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 0.484% | |
| 👎 | 36 | 0.396% | |
| 😡 | 25 | 0.275% | |
| 🫡 | 16 | 0.176% | |
| 🥴 | 15 | 0.165% | |
| 🏆 | 13 | 0.143% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.099% | |
| 1 further kind | 6 | 0.066% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,099reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My angel mother who gave me birth, gets one day to recognize her a year. The heroes who died for our country get one day to recognize them. The birth of Jesus gets one day a year to celebrate. And you actually believe I’m gonna give an entire month for you because you’re gay? NO !!! Who else feels this way I’m sick of this shit?
💯643❤147👏36🔥12
😂😂😂only Trump. @CatturdFanClub
👍213😁81🤣65❤30
LOL - zero self-awareness. AOC: "Elon Musk is one of the most unintelligent billionaires I’ve ever met or seen." @CatturdFanClub
🤡439🤪147💩81😁15
This is gonna be a massive train wreck. After announcing an all-female mayoral transition team, Zohran Mamdani announces his Chief of Staff in City Hall will be a 34-year-old socialist woman from California, who has no real world experience. @CatturdFanClub
💩370🤣210🤮74🏆7
🤡The FACES of Marjorie Taylor Greene @CatturdFanClub
🤮225🤡110👍47🏆6
Best member of the squad Marjorie Taylor Greene is now praising Nancy Pelosi: “I will praise Nancy Pelosi. She had an incredible career for her party. I served under her speakership in my first term in Congress and I’m very impressed at her ability to get things done.” @CatturdFanClub
🤮376🤡152👎36🙏7
This was a murd@r on live television... 😂 @CatturdFanClub
💯287❤37👏14😁11
😂😂😂 ouch.
👍26🔥9🤣3🥰1
Third Rate Congressman Thomas Massie, a Weak and Pathetic RINO from the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky, a place I love, and won big SIX TIMES, must be thrown out of office, ASAP! The incredible people of Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District gave us a mandate to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and the person that will help us do that is Navy SEAL, Army Ranger, and Fifth Generation Kentucky Farmer, Captain Ed Gallrein, a t…
❤235👍80💩15🫡6
Breaking … Polymarket now has a 92% chance of Zohran Mamdani winning NYC major. Unreal. @CatturdFanClub
🤬299💩139😡25❤11
If you're able to work, but instead choose to freeload off the taxes of hardworking Americans you're entire life, you'll get no sympathy from me when they cut your benefits. @CatturdFanClub
👍233💯201❤14
🚨 Common Statin Medication Under Recall Read more 👇 https://theepochtim.es/bsfyzf
🙏93👍39❤9😢9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CatturdFanClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,113,483 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Catturd Fan Club” (@CatturdFanClub), 23,430 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CatturdFanClub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.