شماهم اگه فکر میکردید با حذف هیستوری گوگل دیگه تاریخچه سرچ هاتون دیده نمیشه باید عرض کنم که کور خوندین با این سایت: http://Myactivity.google.com کل سابقهی سرچ گوگلتون رو میتونید ببینید؛
Signed Mus

Channel
@TechHackNews
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
62,404subscribers
-3,358 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001386049449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TechHackNews |
| Description | اخبار روز تکنولوژی، امنیت سایبری، ترفند ها و.. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TechHackNews |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @roidbest/218209 Oct 2026, 11:56 UTC | @TechHackNews/984 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 05:27 UTC | 0.99 | 18 hours |
| @roidbest/2187416 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC | @TechHackNews/987 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC | 0.98 | 6.3 hours |
| @roidbest/2195123 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC | @TechHackNews/992 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 08:54 UTC | 0.98 | 1.9 hours |
| @roidbest/217441 Oct 2026, 12:14 UTC | @TechHackNews/980 · this entry1 Oct 2026, 20:13 UTC | 0.98 | 8.0 hours |
| @roidbest/2185213 Oct 2026, 12:05 UTC | @TechHackNews/985 · this entry13 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC | 0.98 | 29 minutes |
| @roidbest/2159415 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC | @TechHackNews/975 · this entry19 Sept 2026, 03:28 UTC | 0.97 | 3 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @roidbest | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 8.0 hours | @roidbest (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 56 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:47 | 62,404 | -39 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:51 | 62,443 | -25 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:00 | 62,468 | -32 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:49 | 62,500 | -37 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:40 | 62,537 | -61 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:17 | 62,598 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:18 | 62,617 | -33 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:19 | 62,650 | -27 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:19 | 62,677 | -37 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 62,714 | -45 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 62,759 | -39 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 62,798 | -36 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 62,834 | -38 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 62,872 | -35 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:31 | 62,907 | -20 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 62,927 | -47 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 62,974 | -48 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 63,022 | -44 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 63,066 | -33 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 63,099 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (13 June 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 41,295 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
شماهم اگه فکر میکردید با حذف هیستوری گوگل دیگه تاریخچه سرچ هاتون دیده نمیشه باید عرض کنم که کور خوندین با این سایت: http://Myactivity.google.com کل سابقهی سرچ گوگلتون رو میتونید ببینید؛
Signed Mus
📱 چطور پیشنهادهای اکسپلور اینستاگرام را ریست کنیم؟ 🤔 اگر اکسپلورتان پر از محتوای نامرتبط شده، با گزینه Reset Suggested Content میتوانید پیشنهادهای اینستاگرام را از نو تنظیم کنید. ⚙️ برای این کار، وارد بخش ویدئوهای اکسپلور شوید، منوی بالای صفحه را باز کنید و از مسیر Content Preferences > Reset Suggested Content مراحل بازنشانی را انجام دهید. 🔄 این کار پیشنهادهای اکسپلور، ریلز و پستهای پیشنهادی صفحه اصلی را ریست می…
Signed Mus
یه سایت جالب براتون آوردم عکستونو بهش میدید، تو جهان هرکسی که شبیه شما باشه رو بهتون نشون میده و میتونید بدل های خودتونو ببینید. سایتش: facesearch.net
Signed Mus
چطوری با گوشی کار کنیم تا آسیب کمتری به چشممون برسه؟ 👀📱 این پست رو بفرستید برای کسایی که همیشه سرشون تو گوشیه. 🙌
Signed Mus
اینترنت کدوم اپراتور بصرفه تره؟
Signed Mus
🔴لینک های جدیدی که توی توییتر کپی میکنین شامل اطلاعات اکانت و دیوایسی هست که باهاش لینک پست رو کپی کردید ناشناس ها خیلی حواسشون باشه با یه لینک کل هویتشون رو لو ندن هر عدد جلوی S در لینک به معنای یک پلتفرم هست: S=19 Android S=20 Browser S=46 iPhone + حالا یه قاعده کلی بگم ؛ شما هر لینکی رو که خواستید Paste کنید حواستون به تمام عبارات بعد از علامت سوال ? باشه ؛ هرچی که بعد از علامت سوال بود رو پاک کنید، مابقی رو ا…
Signed Mus
🚨 افشای اطلاعات بیش از ۴۱ هزار نفر از کارکنان وزارت امنیت داخلی آمریکا 🔓 در پی یک نفوذ سایبری، اطلاعات کارکنان و پیمانکاران وزارت امنیت داخلی آمریکا (DHS) منتشر شده است؛ از جمله نام، ایمیل، شماره تلفن و محل کار. 🕵️♂️ در میان دادهها، اطلاعات ۶٬۵۹۸ نفر از کارکنان اداره مهاجرت و گمرک آمریکا (ICE) دیده میشود. نام برخی افراد نیز با عنوان «مأمور مخفی» مشخص شده است. 💻 دادههای منتشرشده همچنین به سامانههای داخلی، برنا…
Signed Mus
🔹هک بایننس و ریزش بازار ارزهای دیجیتال! طبق گزارش کوینتلگراف، بنیانگذار بایننس گفته ظاهراً این صرافی هک شده، اما دارایی کاربران امنه و خسارتهای احتمالی جبران میشه. این خبر همزمان با ریزش بازار کریپتو منتشر شده و توجه زیادی رو به خودش جلب کرده. گرچه بایننس سالهاست کاربران ایرانی رو تحریم کرده، اما اتفاقات این صرافی روی بازاری تأثیر میذاره که سرمایه خیلی از ایرانیها هم داخلشه.
Signed Mus
۷ آبان، روز بزرگداشت کوروش بزرگ بر تمامی ایرانیان راستین فرخنده باد. ❤️
Signed Mus
📱بازکردن لینکهای ناشناس ممکن است منجر به بن شدن حساب کاربری تلگرام شود! 💩 یک آسیبپذیری خطرناک در این پیامرسان شناسایی شده است. 📰این مشکل مربوط به نسخههای قدیمیتر تلگرام دسکتاپ بود: یک لینک خاص میتوانست باعث شود که برنامه، فایلها را از کامپیوتر به هکرها منتقل کند، از جمله دادههای مربوط به سشن فعال. این امر امکان دسترسی به حساب کاربری را بدون وارد کردن دستی رمز عبور فراهم میکرد. + این آسیبپذیری در نسخه 7.2…
Signed Mus
🔴 تعرفه اینترنت تا ۴۰ درصد افزایش یافت! 📰 اصلاح تعرفه خدمات اینترنت با تأیید مراجع ذیصلاح، از بامداد جمعه، ۱ آبان ۱۴۰۵ آغاز شده و تعرفههای جدید تا سقف ۴۰ درصد افزایش پیدا کردهاند. + این افزایش تعرفه شامل همه بستهها به یک میزان نیست و برای اطلاع از قیمت دقیق، باید بسته موردنظرتون رو بررسی کنید.
Signed Mus
💡تکنولوژی از 20 سال پیش تاکنون چه فرق هایی کرده؟! + سرعت پیشرفت فناوری توی این دو دهه اونقدر زیاد بوده که انگار چند قرن رو توی چند سال پشت سر گذاشتیم...
Signed Mus
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @TechHackNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@TechHackNews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 77 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🖤اخبار تکنولوژی | هک و امنیت” (@TechHackNews), 62,404 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechHackNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.