Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +48,719. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,438–105,249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 16:22
81,051
-14,643
19 Sept 2026, 14:36
95,694
+37,621
17 Sept 2026, 05:18
58,073
+25,450
15 Sept 2026, 05:15
32,623
-81
13 Sept 2026, 12:00
32,704
-44
11 Sept 2026, 19:38
32,748
-89
9 Sept 2026, 05:18
32,837
-129
5 Sept 2026, 18:41
32,966
-86
3 Sept 2026, 17:37
33,052
-67
2 Sept 2026, 09:03
33,119
-30
1 Sept 2026, 09:53
33,149
-21
31 Aug 2026, 10:25
33,170
-58
30 Aug 2026, 09:12
33,228
-57
29 Aug 2026, 10:44
33,285
-56
28 Aug 2026, 10:34
33,341
-63
27 Aug 2026, 07:06
33,404
-83
26 Aug 2026, 06:32
33,487
+400
25 Aug 2026, 05:47
33,087
+202
24 Aug 2026, 08:04
32,885
+315
22 Aug 2026, 15:17
32,570
first reading
Engagement
255 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.11%
avg views ÷ 81,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
896
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
130
of 255 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 129 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
255 (3 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
116,542
Reactions total
1,200
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 02:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,610
Videos
≈423
Links
≈9,370
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,206 reactions across 253 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
846
38.3%
👍
536
24.3%
🔥
257
11.7%
🤩
162
7.34%
😁
86
3.90%
👌
82
3.72%
🤝
51
2.31%
😭
37
1.68%
🤯
37
1.68%
💔
36
1.63%
🫡
29
1.31%
🤔
12
0.544%
⚡
9
0.408%
😍
9
0.408%
👀
7
0.317%
👻
5
0.227%
👾
4
0.181%
🤷♂
1
0.045%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 253 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 255 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @croownairdrop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 255 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✔️ ربات ویکتور تو پست جدید کانالش نوشته که برای اینکه ربات تشخیص داده نشید باید حتما 0.05 تونو پرداخت کنید
🚨 در غیر این صورت احتمال بن شدن اکانتتون زیاده چون این تنها راهیه که میتونن انسانو از ربات تشخیص بدن
ورود به ربات
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ طبق پستی که گذاشتم الان یکی دو روزه که پرداختی های ربات Ainovum هم کنسله و دیگه پولی نمیدن...
🚨 هر کی که حرفمو گوش کرد و سرمایشو خارج کرد نوش جونش 🖤
✔️ الان هم میگم رو ربات ویکتور که پستشو بالاتر گذاشتم وقت بزارید، تصمیمش با خودتون...
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ پرداختیش تست شده هیچ مشکلی نداره...
✔️ سواپش هم تست شده نگران وریفای توکنش نباشید.
🚨 با هر 5 دلار خرید توکنش روزی 0.2 دلار سود میده
ورود به ربات
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
⭕️⭕️ ربات جادوگر یک طبق پیشبینی هایی که داشتم و قبلا بهتون گفته بودم اسکم شد...
✔️ ادامه دادنش دیگه فایده نداره، بیاید سمت جادوگر دو.
ورود به ربات جادوگر دو
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ رفقا ربات ویکتور خیلی خوبه پیشنهاد میکنم ادامه بدید، کلا ۲۰ ۳۰ هزارتومن اول کار پول میخواد ازتون...
✔️ چارتش هم مشخصه و احتمالا یه ریزش داشته باشیم، توی قیمت پایین تر میتونید یه مقدار خرید بزنید هم سود میکنید و هم سرعت ماینتون افزایش پیدا میکنه ❤️🔥
ورود به ربات
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ ربات برگ هم رفع مشکل شد...
🚨 برا گرفتن تدی هر ۴۰ دقیقه یک بار باید رو قسمت Mine بزنید و تبلیغات ببینید...
✔️ گردونشم درست شد و روزی 500 تا 1500 تا برگ میده، بازی توی بازی هاشم راحت میشه برگ گرفت و تا روزی یه دلار ازش درامد داشت 🔥
ورود به ربات
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
🚨 رفقا واسه ربات جادوگر دو دقیقا همون استراتژی قبلی رو پیاده کنید...
✔️ اول کار فقط جادوگر بخرید و درامد روزانتون رو تا حد امکان بالا ببرید، حالا تا 5k یا 10k.
✔️ بعدش دیگه فقط کتاب بخرید و تا زمانی که پول بده فقط برداشت کنید...
ورود به ربات جادوگر یک
ورود به ربات جادوگر دو
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ لیست اپدیت شده ربات هایی که معرفی کردیم و تا الان مشکلی نداشتن :
ورود به ربات MRG
ورود به ربات Ainovum
ورود به ربات شیبا
ورود به ربات جادوگر
ورود به ربات جادوگر دوم
ورود به ربات tontrader ( برادر ainovum)
ورود به ربات ماینری meebits
ورود به ربات برگ
ورود به ربات AIearn
ورود به ربات ویکتور
✔️ کامل تر و بهتر از این لیست پیدا نخواهید کرد، لذت ببرید 🔥
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ ربات ماینری مشابه ATF و MRG که با وصلکردن ولتتون ماینر رایگانش شروع میشه
✔️ تسکاشم تایمیهو روزی چند بار میتونید بزنید
🚨 برای وریفای کردن حسابشم نیاز به 0.05ton دارید...
ورود به ربات
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
✔️ جادوگر دو هم مثل نسخه یکش برداشت فوری داره و زیر 30 ثانیه به ولتتون میشینه...
✔️ رباتش تازه اومده پس از الان شروع کنید که سریعتر به سود برسید.
ورود به ربات
✈️ @croownairdrop 💬 @croown_gp
🫡4👍3❤🔥2👌1🔥1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @croownairdrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@croownairdrop edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 September 2026
Most recent edit
27 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تحلیل طلا، دلار و… | دکتر سینا سوادکوهی @sinasavadkouhi · 74,275 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
طهلیل پیکنیکی @TahlilPikniki · 75,031 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
𝗙𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗧𝗶𝗸𝗡𝗶𝗸𝗶 @FootballTikNiki · 27,542 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 8 September 2026
اخبار اقتصادی @digital_khabar · 226,004 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
DigitalHub AI | فیلترشکن | کریپتو @DigiHubAI · 55,362 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
🖤اخبار تکنولوژی | هک و امنیت @TechHackNews · 63,792 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 August 2026
کریپتو | ماینینگ | ارز @airdrop_iranixvip · 74,076 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
ترفند های موبایل | هوش مصنوعی | تکنولوژی | ایلیاگراف @iliyagraph_ir · 97,408 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Freeairdropland | گیفت تلگرام @freeairdropland1 · 134,495 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
DropZoneTG @dsyts · 102,810 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 September 2026
Работа для девушек @Gscort · 19,884 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 September 2026
PCE News @Pce_News · 19,839 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crown AirDrop | ایردراپ | گیفت” (@croownairdrop), 81,051 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/croownairdrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.