10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,455–34,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:54
34,489
-43
14 Aug 2026, 08:57
34,532
-34
13 Aug 2026, 02:47
34,566
-26
12 Aug 2026, 01:15
34,592
-19
10 Aug 2026, 22:32
34,611
-38
10 Aug 2026, 01:11
34,649
-22
8 Aug 2026, 23:34
34,671
-23
8 Aug 2026, 00:51
34,694
-20
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
34,714
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:51
34,714
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.98%
avg views ÷ 34,489 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.703%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
36 (21 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
37,008
Reactions total
256
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈48
Links
≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
256 reactions across 35 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
29.3%
👍
47
18.4%
💯
28
10.9%
❤🔥
27
10.5%
🏆
25
9.77%
🤩
17
6.64%
😎
12
4.69%
🔥
9
3.52%
🤪
6
2.34%
🌚
4
1.56%
👀
2
0.781%
🍾
1
0.391%
😢
1
0.391%
😱
1
0.391%
🤓
1
0.391%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💻نسخه بتا تلگرام نمایش جدیدی برای کامنت گیفت ها درحال ازمایشه.
🌟 به این صورت کار میکنه که شما موقع ارسال گیفت میتونید براش کامنت بزارین و این کامنت شما میتونه خصوصی یا عمومی باشه
یعنی فقط دریافت کننده گیفت بیینه یا همه بتونن
کلا داستانش با اون کامنت که زیر گیفت هاست جداس
🌟 @daramad_2olari
✅ روزانه کلیم بزنید این قسمت هم تسک هاشو بزنید لازم نیست فالو کنید برگشت بزنید بعد یک ساعت کلیم بزنید پاداش رو بگیرید
✅ ایردراپ ماینی تازه معرفی شده از لینک زیر شروع کن
📱 پاول دورف تولد تلگرام رو با این پست تبریک گفت:
3️⃣1️⃣ تلگرام امروز ۱۳ ساله شد!
بیش از نصف این مدت، یعنی ۷.۵ سال، جزو ۱۰ اپلیکیشن موبایلیِ پردانلود دنیا بوده.
یه نسل کامل با تلگرام بزرگ شده 💪
🎂 تولدت مبارک، تلگرام
🌟 @daramad_2olari
⛔️ ایردراپ ماینی جدید | Toleno Network
🌟 یه پروژه جدید Web3 به اسم Toleno Network که میتونی با گوشی شروع به جمعآوری توکن TOL کنی!
⭐️ برنامه رو مستقیم از Google Play دانلود کن و ثبتنام کن.
✅ کد دعوت من:
milad8080
✅ بعد از ورود، حتماً کد دعوت رو بزن و وارد Team شو. با انجام تسکها و فعال کردن Boost میتونی فعالیت و پاداشهای حسابت رو بیشتر کنی.
✅ جلسات ماین روزانه انجام میشه، پس حواست باشه فعالیتت رو از دست ندی…
این ربات اسکم هست توکنی که برداشت میزنید شبیه تتر هست به اسم و همون شبیه تتر ولی یه توکم ساختگی و قابل نقد شدن نیست
https://t.me/myBeeWalletbot/wallet?startapp=6618746351
❌ بلاک کنید این ربات اسکمه
✅ ایردراپ ماین جدید | PERIA
✅یه پروژه جدید به اسم PERIA که با ماین داخل اپلیکیشن میتونی توکن جمع کنی.
✅ طبق اعلام پروژه، با رسیدن موجودی به 500 PERIA امکان نقد کردن فراهم میشه و گفته شده تو بعضی صرافیها هم لیست شده.
✅ آموزش شروع:
✅ از لینک وارد Google Play شو و برنامه رو نصب کن
✅ بدون فیلترشکن وارد شو
✅ ثبتنام و تأییدهای لازم رو انجام بده
✅ هر ۲ ساعت یکبار ماین رو فعال کن ⛏️
PERIA رو از دست نده؛ شاید این یکی…
افرادی که یکی از تیک ها براتون فعال نیست طبق تجربه بچه ها روبل بخرید دو تا بعد مدتی تیک گذینه فعال میشه برای خرید روبل میتونید از ادمین مورد نظر و معتبر خرید کنید
✅ برای خرید روبی موردنیاز احراز هویت کافیه به آیدی زیر پیام بدین:
🔵 @Nahal_3454
🟢 @Nahal_3454
🪙 من کلا چن تا ایردراپ ماینی میزنم که معرفی کردم اینم یه سالی هست میزنم
⤵️ از لینک زیر ثبت نام کنید کد دعوت حتما بزنید وارد گروه بشید
https://j.bee.com/s?a=milad8080
✅کد دعوت : milad8080
24 ساعت یکبار ماین بزنید پروژه خوبیه
همین روبی رو ماین کنید من سال بعد خودم از واسط معتبر یا حضوری ازتون میخرم
دیدم که میگم واقعا خفنه و سود میده
ماین روبی رو حتما ادامه بدید و فعال باشید که احرازتون تایید بشه
زمان داره میتونید شروع کنید
اگه شروع نکردی با لینک زیر ثبت نام کن هر 24 ساعت یکبار کلیم بزنید⤵️
https://rubi.click/join/MRAIRDROPE
✅ کد دعوت رو حتما بزنید وارد تیم بشید موقع احراز هویت کمکتون کنم به مشکل نخورید
✅ MRAIRDROPE
💯2❤1
Signed 『𓆩🩶𓆪 ᴍɪʟᴀᴅ
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @daramad_2olari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 828,945 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Freeairdropland | گیفت تلگرام @freeairdropland1 · 140,187 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دلار | ایردراپ | گیفت” (@daramad_2olari), 34,489 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daramad_2olari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.