Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Terl Kabot official

Channel

Terl Kabot official

@TERLKABOT_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

43,605subscribers

-678 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595676033
TypeChannel
Username@TERLKABOT_official
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TERLKABOT_official

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

43,57044,28343,926.57 August 2026 — 44,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,277 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,252 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,224 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,190 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,186 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,160 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,133 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,104 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,086 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,076 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,059 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,060 subscribers22 August 2026 — 44,044 subscribers24 August 2026 — 44,047 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,023 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44,006 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,029 subscribers28 August 2026 — 44,047 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,040 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,046 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,048 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,047 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,046 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,025 subscribers5 September 2026 — 44,003 subscribers8 September 2026 — 43,966 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,931 subscribers13 September 2026 — 43,930 subscribers14 September 2026 — 43,926 subscribers16 September 2026 — 43,918 subscribers18 September 2026 — 43,888 subscribers25 September 2026 — 43,830 subscribers4 October 2026 — 43,710 subscribers8 October 2026 — 43,654 subscribers12 October 2026 — 43,618 subscribers14 October 2026 — 43,581 subscribers15 October 2026 — 43,584 subscribers16 October 2026 — 43,583 subscribers17 October 2026 — 43,572 subscribers18 October 2026 — 43,571 subscribers19 October 2026 — 43,570 subscribers20 October 2026 — 43,607 subscribers21 October 2026 — 43,622 subscribers22 October 2026 — 43,617 subscribers24 October 2026 — 43,615 subscribers25 October 2026 — 43,605 subscribers43,6057 August 202625 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 79 days, net -678. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,463–44,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 10:3943,605-10
24 Oct 2026, 13:4643,615-2
22 Oct 2026, 14:4443,617-5
21 Oct 2026, 08:5843,622+15
20 Oct 2026, 07:4643,607+37
19 Oct 2026, 08:3143,570-1
18 Oct 2026, 07:3443,571-1
17 Oct 2026, 09:5643,572-11
16 Oct 2026, 13:2143,583-1
15 Oct 2026, 14:4143,584+3
14 Oct 2026, 11:5743,581-37
12 Oct 2026, 21:1643,618-36
8 Oct 2026, 10:5943,654-56
4 Oct 2026, 00:1843,710-120
25 Sept 2026, 02:4043,830-58
18 Sept 2026, 21:1743,888-30
16 Sept 2026, 14:2143,918-8
14 Sept 2026, 16:5943,926-4
13 Sept 2026, 02:5843,930-1
11 Sept 2026, 04:3743,931first reading

Engagement

207 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 43,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 207 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held207 (31 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total840,280
Reactions total25,354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 07:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 45s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

77,372 reactions across 201 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 526028511444889108622,62929.2%
custom 540691318481040982920,67926.7%
custom 544514941033595384614,71619.0%
custom 544485984793582636810,37413.4%
custom 54452634932572708713,9695.13%
🤷‍♂2,1442.77%
💩1,5361.99%
🤡1,3251.71%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 207 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77,372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 207 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,038
across the posts below
Posts paid on
144
of 201 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
441
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TERLKABOT_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 207 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 18:27 UTC≈5,210 views244 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Спасибо, Игорь.

🤷‍♂123custom 526028511444889108656custom 544485984793582636833custom 544514941033595384630💩2

24 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC≈6,170 views291 reactions252 Starsread 25 October 2026

Бля, а почему свин? Ладно, забейте, не удалять же теперь.

🤷‍♂149custom 540691318481040982964custom 544514941033595384648custom 544485984793582636813custom 526028511444889108612💩4🤡1

24 Oct 2026, 16:56 UTC≈6,180 views307 reactionsread 25 October 2026

39% считают, что я Человек-собако-свин. А на основании чего собственно? 46% это ещё и нравится. Вы в своём уме вообще?

custom 5445149410335953846160custom 5406913184810409829102custom 526028511444889108628custom 544485984793582636812💩4🤡1

24 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC≈6,640 views171 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Poll

Скажите, пожалуйста, только честно: я ЧСВ?

  1. Да38%
  2. Нет29%
  3. Да, но мне это нравится.47%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 526028511444889108689custom 544514941033595384636custom 544485984793582636834🤡9custom 54069131848104098293

24 Oct 2026, 12:32 UTCviews —

Terl Kabot official pinned «ВЫШЕЛ! ВЫШЕЛ ВЫШЕЛ! ТРЕШ ОБЗОР фильма ПИНОККИО: раскрепощённый»

24 Oct 2026, 12:15 UTC≈7,490 views273 reactions4 Starsread 25 October 2026

ВЫШЕЛ! ВЫШЕЛ ВЫШЕЛ! ТРЕШ ОБЗОР фильма ПИНОККИО: раскрепощённый

custom 5444859847935826368156custom 526028511444889108658custom 544514941033595384642🤡16💩1

21 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTC≈12,200 views617 reactions13 Starsread 25 October 2026

Подавать заявку на НАСРАЛ, ребята?

custom 5260285114448891086411💩87custom 544514941033595384668custom 544485984793582636833🤷‍♂9custom 54069131848104098299

17 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC≈19,900 views514 reactions1 Starread 25 October 2026

Кстати, я кажется знаю, с чем связан спад моей популярности... На мои обзоры перестал записывать реакции Вредный Валентин.

custom 5406913184810409829296custom 5260285114448891086125custom 544514941033595384654custom 544485984793582636836💩2🤡1

17 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC≈19,100 views664 reactionsread 25 October 2026

А с каким посылом вы ставите реакцию кота? Типа "похуй, идём дальше/мимо"?

custom 5260285114448891086518custom 544514941033595384663🤷‍♂32💩17custom 540691318481040982916custom 544485984793582636815🤡3

17 Oct 2026, 08:24 UTC≈18,000 views350 reactions1 Starread 25 October 2026

Сегодня, кстати, планируется РЕАКЦИЯ на сериал "ХРУСТАЛЬНОЕ ОЗЕРО".

custom 5260285114448891086253custom 544514941033595384658custom 544485984793582636832🤷‍♂5💩2

17 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTC≈16,600 views200 reactions2 Starsread 25 October 2026

На самом деле на БУСТИ сохраняются не записи стримов, а РЕАКЦИИ на ФИЛЬМЫ! Подписывайся, если не знал - https://boosty.to/terlkabot

custom 5260285114448891086136custom 544514941033595384638custom 544485984793582636821custom 54069131848104098293💩2

17 Oct 2026, 05:53 UTC≈15,500 views242 reactions3 Starsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Карл из Ходячих мертвецов снял очередную короткометражку (до этого я видел с ним короткометражку про чела-паука) - фан-фильм по седьмой Обители зла, который представляет собой покадровую пересъемку катсцен из начала игры. Не знаю зачем это нужно, но выглядит неплохо. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL5slNvcrow

custom 5445149410335953846173custom 526028511444889108631custom 544485984793582636829💩9

Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @TERLKABOT_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTCAnonymous Poll2,400 voters approx.

Скажите, пожалуйста, только честно: я ЧСВ?

  1. Да38%
  2. Нет29%
  3. Да, но мне это нравится.47%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTCAnonymous Poll1,550 voters approx.

Кстати, мне тут стало интересно, если бы такие дебаты состоялись, на чьей стороне вы были бы?

  1. Стас39%
  2. Мэд69%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 207 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,121,155
#1
персик
@anthonyuly · 233,472
#2
КШИШТОВСКИЙ
@kshishtovsky · 25,394
#3
SNAILKICK
@snailkick · 75,624
#4
KinoKiller Reviews
@dimonkinokiller · 16,767
#5
Strange Critic
@StrangeCritic · 5,898
#6
Двач
@dvachannel · 971,654
#7
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,620
#8
Миша Дарко
@mishadarko1993 · 3,548
#9
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 712,410
#10
Terl Kabot_stream
@TerlKabot_stream · 3,295
#11
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 324,030
#12
Mash
@mash · 3,150,586
#13
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 364,972
#14
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,976,428
#15
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,799
#16
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 204,524
#17
КБ
@cbpub · 669,611
#18
4ch
@why4ch · 1,027,949
#19
GreenGrass
@greengrassreal · 30,632
#20
Рандомач/Двач
@rand2ch · 169,752
#21
Каргас
@kargacc · 98,091
#22
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,730,742
#23
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,124
#24
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 181,555
#25
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 176,573
#26
nerds
@nerds · 413,578
#27
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 491,598
#28
Неприятный канал
@unpleasent · 486,478
#29
StopGame.ru
@stopgameru · 82,576
#30
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 386,400
#31
CustomStories
@customstories · 37,302
#32
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,528
#33
Rozetked
@rozetked · 653,436
#34
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 798,307
#35
Poleznyibes Батины Новости
@batyanews · 57,870
#36
Абу
@abuwtf · 277,210
#37
Cut The Crap
@cutterpool · 58,789
#38
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,013,394
#39
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,714
#40
CherevatBlog
@cherevatstreams · 151,652
#41
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 967,552
#42
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 112,658
#43
Танцпол в полоску
@shtrihdog · 4,849
#44
Гуфовский
@GGufen · 37,029
#45
UsachevRuslan
@usachevruslan · 216,621
#46
FFT
@ffttelega · 44,768
#47
КультасLIVE
@kultas_live · 31,713
#48
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 211,656
#49
Зио
@zio402 · 44,161
#50
Коммандер
@ilya_commander · 48,368
#51
КБ. Игры
@cb_games · 377,182
#52
Никита Антагонист️
@nikitaantagonist · 1,175
#53
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 488,630
#54
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,558,078
#55
StopGame.ru - Игровые новости
@stopgamenews · 35,299
#56
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,948
#57
Игорь Линк
@IgorLinkChannel · 72,657
#58
Лентач
@oldlentach · 263,241
#59
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 207,288
#60
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 365,999
#61
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 323,799
#62
Чувак который андед
@chuvak1337 · 23,130
#63
IGM
@igmtv · 130,577
#64
Клиент всегда прав
@klientvsprav · 1,034,839
#65
РЫНДЫЧ
@R_4an · 57,654
#66
Кель`
@GosdepSHA · 119,325
#67
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 85,928
#68
Фаустов Лес
@faust21century · 73,262
#69
MDK
@mudak · 526,855
#70
James Alone Official Entertainment System
@jamesaloneteam · 37,927
#71
Вестник Чака
@tele_chuck · 33,570
#72
Мятежник Джек
@rebel_jack_review · 22,011
#73
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,097,710
#74
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 908,281
#75
IXBT Games | Короче
@ixbtgames · 68,122
#76
RuGG. Скандалы, игры, повесточка
@ggscg_tg · 13,513
#77
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,862
#78
Игровой Канал Блэка [BlackUFA] 🎮
@blackufa_official · 52,582
#79
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,097,672
#80
Мир PlayStation
@world_playstation · 307,057
#81
Красный Циник | Red Cynic
@redcynic · 10,454
#82
Alina Rin 🐟
@welcome2RHK · 60,886
#83

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вестник Чака
@tele_chuck · 33,570
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Terl Kabot official” (@TERLKABOT_official), 43,605 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TERLKABOT_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.