Смотрим как Джесон штурмует Манхеттен - https://www.twitch.tv/terlkabot
custom 5260285114448891086141💩17custom 544514941033595384616custom 54448598479358263683

Channel
@TERLKABOT_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,966subscribers
-317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001595676033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TERLKABOT_official |
| Description | Абуабыбыыбуаыуффф Ыыыаааооэээ - https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6757002fc577eb7c52610214®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TERLKABOT_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 43,966 | -37 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 44,003 | -22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 44,025 | -21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:12 | 44,046 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:14 | 44,047 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 44,048 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 44,046 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 44,040 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 44,047 | +18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 44,029 | +23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 44,006 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 44,023 | -24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 44,047 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 44,044 | -16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 44,060 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 44,059 | -17 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 44,076 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 44,086 | -18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 44,104 | -29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 44,133 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (31 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 878,890 |
| Reactions total | 24,863 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 11:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38,113 reactions across 97 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260285114448891086 | 11,389 | 29.9% | |
| custom 5406913184810409829 | 10,311 | 27.1% | |
| custom 5445149410335953846 | 6,114 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5444859847935826368 | 4,292 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5445263493257270871 | 3,962 | 10.4% | |
| 🤷♂ | 777 | 2.04% | |
| 💩 | 750 | 1.97% | |
| 🤡 | 518 | 1.36% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TERLKABOT_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 99 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Смотрим как Джесон штурмует Манхеттен - https://www.twitch.tv/terlkabot
custom 5260285114448891086141💩17custom 544514941033595384616custom 54448598479358263683
Отписки прут. Надо либо снова комп разыграть, либо перестать писать херню. И лишнего компа у меня нет.
custom 5406913184810409829583custom 5445149410335953846104custom 526028511444889108652custom 544485984793582636843🤡11💩7🤷♂4
Хотелось бы продолжить эту тему с примерами, но в итоге вы меня же выставите токсичным долбоёбом, который опять до кого-то решил доебаться. И исходя из ваших ответов, большинство не против удаления негативных комментариев в пользу создания приятной, уютной атмосферы. Поэтому теперь в комментах под роликами можно только вылизывать мне яйца и жопу и писать какой я классный, какое у меня шикарное чувство юмора, какой кр…
custom 5260285114448891086293custom 544485984793582636879custom 540691318481040982973custom 544514941033595384638💩13🤡6🤷♂1
Как считаете, удалять ВСЕ негативные комменты под своими роликами, создавая тем самым видимость какой-то непогрешимости и образа идеала - это норма? Типа, каждый дрочит как он хочет. Или это признак слабости и какой-то невероятной закомплексованности? Я вот уже очень давно не тру комменты. Бывает разве что в порыве скверного настроения выдам кому-нить бан. В остальном похуй, даже не реагирую на негатив в большинстве …
custom 5444859847935826368312custom 544514941033595384671custom 540691318481040982959custom 526028511444889108630💩7🤡2
Помогите, надо 200 человек на стриме, чтобы я начал смотреть Пятница 13ая часть 3 - https://www.twitch.tv/terlkabot
custom 5406913184810409829177custom 526028511444889108638💩17custom 544485984793582636816custom 544514941033595384616
Разоблачение отменяется.
custom 5444859847935826368185custom 544514941033595384656custom 526028511444889108626custom 540691318481040982917💩6🤷♂5
Помните, что я говорил про взрывающихся людей в фильмах? Походу Зак Крегер слышал или просто шарит, как можно любой фильм с делать классным и зрелищным. Всё, теперь жду этот фильм с нетерпением. Это будет пушка 12 из 10. Надеюсь это не единственная подобная сцена в фильме. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Wux0A9bJI
custom 5445149410335953846172custom 526028511444889108642💩10custom 54069131848104098297custom 54448598479358263684🤡1
Так, на меня (и не только) готовится разоблачение. Ничему не верьте, всё правда. Заранее перед всеми извиняюсь. Идите на хуй. P.S. Жопа на превьюшке - это позор и изгнание из рая.
custom 5260285114448891086361custom 544485984793582636885custom 544514941033595384663custom 540691318481040982930💩8🤡4
Если у кукурузы есть дети, значит её кто-то трахает?
custom 5445149410335953846352custom 5406913184810409829196custom 544526349325727087155custom 544485984793582636836custom 526028511444889108617🤡12💩7🤷♂7
Мне сегодня кошмар приснился, будто я ставлю еду погреться в микроволновку, а когда достаю - тарелка ХОЛОДНАЯ!
custom 5260285114448891086206custom 5406913184810409829132custom 544514941033595384645custom 544526349325727087123custom 544485984793582636810💩6
О, классно! Вы ведь помните, какая там крутая была трилогия? 1ая часть: https://youtu.be/mL4A_C00ZX4 2ая часть: https://youtu.be/hT7qlbyZcs8 3ья часть: https://youtu.be/egPGxgdGTrs
custom 5260285114448891086179custom 544514941033595384642💩14custom 540691318481040982913custom 54448598479358263686custom 54452634932572708715
Смотрим https://www.twitch.tv/terlkabot
custom 5260285114448891086151custom 540691318481040982928custom 544485984793582636817custom 544514941033595384614💩5custom 54452634932572708712
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @TERLKABOT_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кстати, мне тут стало интересно, если бы такие дебаты состоялись, на чьей стороне вы были бы?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Terl Kabot official” (@TERLKABOT_official), 43,966 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TERLKABOT_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.