Channel
@betvc_voice
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,041subscribers
+902 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001587691712 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @betvc_voice |
| Description | https://www.youtube.com/c/bettervoice https://vk.com/better_voice Я законопослушный гражданин: https://clck.ru/3RkPwh КП: https://www.kinopoisk.ru/user/betvc/ |
| Created | 11 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/betvc_voice |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 41,041 | +1 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 41,040 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 41,052 | -37 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 41,089 | +13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 41,076 | +26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 41,050 | -21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 41,071 | +3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 41,068 | +19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 41,049 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:43 | 41,048 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 41,060 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 41,046 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 41,036 | +17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 41,019 | +23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 40,996 | +81 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 40,915 | +281 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 40,634 | +31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 40,603 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 40,600 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 40,642 | first reading |
182 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 182 (28 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,326,760 |
| Reactions total | 51,220 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118,128 reactions across 180 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5283060402601601406 | 38,769 | 32.8% | |
| custom 5235622845299565321 | 16,240 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5249419259506876700 | 15,549 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5346320683846635411 | 15,299 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5460704463327074557 | 13,188 | 11.2% | |
| 💩 | 8,266 | 7.00% | |
| 🤡 | 7,324 | 6.20% | |
| custom 5269378947488947413 | 3,493 | 2.96% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 180 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118,128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @betvc_voice. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 182 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Короче фильм фейк ебаный в поезде в пусан было 0 зомбей!!!
custom 5283060402601601406539💩61custom 534632068384663541145custom 524941925950687670014custom 52693789474889474139🤡7custom 52356228452995653216custom 54607044633270745575
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5346320683846635411204custom 546070446332707455792custom 528306040260160140646💩9custom 52356228452995653215custom 52494192595068767005🤡4
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5283060402601601406185🤡56custom 534632068384663541142custom 546070446332707455714💩13custom 52494192595068767007custom 52693789474889474133
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5283060402601601406178custom 524941925950687670078custom 526937894748894741326custom 534632068384663541115💩8🤡3
Паблик будет жить назло хейтерам.
custom 5283060402601601406309custom 524941925950687670091💩57custom 523562284529956532122🤡13custom 546070446332707455711custom 53463206838466354119custom 52693789474889474135
Не очень хочу знать кто ЦА у такого. Я думаю, они людей едят
custom 5249419259506876700200custom 523562284529956532146custom 528306040260160140639custom 534632068384663541112💩9🤡3
Video message, posted without a caption
🤡1,120custom 5235622845299565321116custom 534632068384663541147custom 528306040260160140637custom 524941925950687670013💩7custom 54607044633270745575
Паблик закрывается Всем спасибо!
custom 5283060402601601406718custom 534632068384663541196custom 523562284529956532164custom 524941925950687670028💩25custom 546070446332707455721🤡17custom 526937894748894741314
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5283060402601601406283custom 524941925950687670090custom 523562284529956532175💩19🤡8custom 53463206838466354118custom 54607044633270745576custom 52693789474889474131
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5235622845299565321261custom 524941925950687670092custom 546070446332707455775💩19custom 526937894748894741310custom 52830604026016014069🤡5custom 53463206838466354115
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 5283060402601601406251custom 5249419259506876700104custom 534632068384663541130💩13🤡2custom 52356228452995653212
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5235622845299565321199custom 528306040260160140675custom 534632068384663541141🤡12custom 524941925950687670012💩8
Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @betvc_voice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@betvc_voice edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой контент вы от меня больше всего ждете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Член
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голосовые из Фрязино (Better Voice)” (@betvc_voice), 41,041 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betvc_voice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.