Channel
@betvc_voice
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40,491subscribers
+352 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001587691712 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @betvc_voice |
| Created | 11 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/betvc_voice |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 40,491 | +350 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 40,141 | +39 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 40,102 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 40,103 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 40,105 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 40,111 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 40,109 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 40,117 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 40,108 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 40,126 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 40,139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 40,139 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (28 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 859,640 |
| Reactions total | 38,149 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38,149 reactions across 46 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5283060402601601406 | 11,633 | 30.5% | |
| custom 5346320683846635411 | 5,895 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5460704463327074557 | 5,426 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5249419259506876700 | 5,292 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5235622845299565321 | 4,366 | 11.4% | |
| 💩 | 3,494 | 9.16% | |
| custom 5269378947488947413 | 1,105 | 2.90% | |
| 🤡 | 938 | 2.46% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @betvc_voice. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
я пойду на канье веста в питере, только если он исполнит гейфиш. других его песен я не знаю
custom 5283060402601601406164custom 534632068384663541121custom 546070446332707455717custom 52356228452995653217custom 52494192595068767004💩1
Залил, кстати, просмотр Фредди против джейсона со стрима на бусти. Можно посмотреть бесплатно, без подписки https://boosty.to/bettervoice
custom 5346320683846635411309custom 528306040260160140677custom 546070446332707455754custom 524941925950687670017custom 52356228452995653218💩6🤡5
Кстати, проезжал сегодня мимо своего кореша
custom 5283060402601601406470💩57custom 524941925950687670049custom 546070446332707455736custom 534632068384663541113🤡4custom 52356228452995653213
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 5283060402601601406163custom 523562284529956532125🤡23custom 524941925950687670011custom 54607044633270745579💩4custom 53463206838466354114
Фывыжыждцщй https://youtu.be/1hAGVMByj64
custom 5235622845299565321379custom 5249419259506876700114custom 528306040260160140654🤡39custom 534632068384663541116💩11
закинул новый обзор на бусти https://boosty.to/bettervoice
custom 5460704463327074557274custom 524941925950687670072custom 534632068384663541163custom 528306040260160140620💩10🤡9custom 52356228452995653219custom 52693789474889474137
Video, posted without a caption
custom 5346320683846635411427custom 546070446332707455769custom 528306040260160140641custom 524941925950687670011🤡5custom 52356228452995653215💩4
я бы хотел поменьше выёбываться, но пока что нет такой возможности :(
custom 5460704463327074557541custom 5249419259506876700142custom 523562284529956532176custom 534632068384663541129custom 528306040260160140622💩11🤡5
Спасибо
custom 5460704463327074557327custom 524941925950687670095custom 523562284529956532142custom 528306040260160140620custom 534632068384663541110💩7🤡1
Так как сегодня Пятница 14-е, я посмотрю на стриме вечерком ремейк Пятницы 13-е. Все логично.
custom 5283060402601601406676custom 523562284529956532192💩49custom 524941925950687670021custom 534632068384663541111custom 546070446332707455710🤡4
Я практически залпом посмотрел все части Пятницы 13 . В пиздюшничестве только ремейк 2009 года смотрел, помню там титьки прикольные женские были. До оригинальных фильмов чет не доходило дело. Решил исправить. Ну и че можно сказать, это франшиза полная хуета 🫥 Даже удивительно, как такое говнище смогли размазать аж на целых 10 фильмов. Если обычно долгоиграющие франшизы устроены таким образом, что первый фильм збс, в…
custom 5460704463327074557446custom 5283060402601601406134custom 524941925950687670066custom 523562284529956532112🤡10💩9custom 53463206838466354119custom 52693789474889474133
Никаких нафиг стримов блин чёрт. Думал вчера глянуть фильм со своими любимыми подписчиками!!!! А в интернете перестали раздавать бесплатные фильмы
custom 5249419259506876700381custom 5283060402601601406102custom 526937894748894741354custom 534632068384663541132💩9🤡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @betvc_voice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 561,518 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голосовые из Фрязино (Better Voice)” (@betvc_voice), 40,491 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betvc_voice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.