Channel
@KoHaBuC
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002706346116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KoHaBuC |
| Description | - Закон малых чисел гласит, что есть уникальные люди, которые способны начать эпидемию. - Урок фактора прилипчивости в том, что существуют способы подачи информации, которые при определенных обстоятельствах делают эту информацию особо запоминающейся. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 15 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KoHaBuC |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 32 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 32 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
47 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 72.3% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 2.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 18 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
поведение в тренчах. Записи на Q4 2025 год 🔵содержание: 1. Что в основном котируется 2. Когда листится 3. Варианты стратегий 🔵список проанализированных монет, взяты произвольно: $PFP, $TOKABU, $USDUC, $USELESS, $CHILLGUY, $WIF, $ROME, $SPSN, $BUBBLE, $PEOPLE, $PLAIPIN, $POPCAT, $SORA, $NL, $MASK, $1, $NEET, $URANUS, $TROLL, $GROUP7, $LION, $HOUSE, $WOBBLES, $KITKAT, $NEO, $CHILLHOUSE, $MEC, $CANCER, $PERCOLATOR. 🔵…
❤🔥1
🔵монетизация культуры - для меня это в буквальном смысле на примере $PFP взять в рамочку аву профиля и залаунчить монету. Тоже самое и с $TROLL и с прочими: взять в рамку главный смысл культуры и залаунчить токен 🔵мета - то, что сейчас особенно растет. Пример: посмотрите на график $PAYAI. Рост до 60кк капы был из-за мини-меты х402, после чего он вернулся на 10кк. Условно говоря, это пузырь, монеты которого часто идут…
3. варианты стратегий Тут напишу не так много, хотя тема довольно обширная. Стратегий очень много, надо лишь подбирать под вашу личность, и это куда более серьезно, чем может казаться, но напишу две основные, которые могут подойти и вам. 1. отрабатывать лаунчи на лаунчах часто идет переоценка, если актив растет импульсивно. Инструменты: 🔵GMGN (trending) - подобрать фильтры 🔵GFOMO - трекер крупных кошей 🔵трекер коше…
👎2❤1
закрыл. Изначально история начиналась с того, что один из тгк публикует под вечер пост про $ASTER. Я с большой заинтересованностью смотрю соц. сети проекта и начинаю думать, что тут не так? Почему никто о проекте не пишет? Не долго думая я закидываю свои $SOL на декс, после чего появляются проблемы. Я не могу продать ее и конвертировать в usdt, т.к. $SOL находится на счете перпа. Попытался перевести на спот, но депоз…
👍1
$aster — аналог hyperliquid в лице бинанса. Что примечательно, так это то, что есть аналог от трона, тикер $SUN. На днях его залистили на апбит, что дало хороший прайс. Долго ли ждать выхода от $aster? Также соблюдайте риски, рынок неплохо так разогрет, и покупайте $bagwork ( не ИИС)
✍1💩1
Не закрыл, держу. CZ только начал раскачивать, к тому же листингов толком не было, только фьючи, где фандинг 0.4% за 4 часа, перелил в спот. Спасибо ему
❤2
$pump залистился на upbit и binance spot
🤨1😈1
Come on, my son, I believe in you
❤2
представлю вам также записки, когда активно был в тренчах. Исходя из мыслей, что рынок цикличен: 19 января — pump fun 31 октября — пнут листинг 18 января — трамп 25 окт - 5 ноября — ? время листингов раннеров: CAR - 01:25 - щиток от президента LUX - 03:40 - типо олд проект(хз на самом деле), дев лицо показал JAILSTOOK - 23:40 - мем от топ сео VINE - 03:20 - мем от олд проекта SSE - 06:10 - мем от не олда проекта, н…
❤5🔥1
“AI/Robotics narrative emerging - CoinGecko added a new Robotics category. Projects like AUKI seeing smart money accumulation according to Nansen. The sector's getting institutional attention as the next DePIN wave.” pivot to prediction markets and humanoid robotics if you are in memes [i like $pengu btw] https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/robotics
Закрыл большую часть, производил донабор с момента просадки с шагом 0.0005±. Пампфан медленно зарождает стриминговую деятельность, возможно, новый нарратив намечается, но я все также жду нарратив ИИ + робототехника. Свое стремление развивать стримы пампфан выразил после листинга, сейчас держит свой интерес и запуск токена $mitch показывает заинтересованность к этой сфере. Хотелось бы дополнить, что мною двигало при…
❤2🤝1🤣1
Очень интересная идея забрела в мою голову на ночь глядя. $GOR Монету очень быстро запушили до ~65кк капы, нынешняя капа ~15кк. Про команду, СТО не вижу смысла долго распинаться, данные по команде представлены на их сайте, они кропотливо работают над проектом, а СТО активно поддерживает как в твиттере, так и в телеграмме, меня интересует другое. А именно — нфт-коллекция. Я решил посмотреть, как оценивается фдв их нф…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KoHaBuC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 764,705 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@KoHaBuC named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sol'itary consolation” (@KoHaBuC), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KoHaBuC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.