☁️ Paying for Cloud Services? Your infrastructure shouldn't be limited by payment. 💳 Use MPay Visa Card ⚡️ Top up with USDT 🌍 Pay cloud providers worldwide Supported platforms include: ☁️ Hetzner ☁️ OVHcloud ☁️ Cloudflare ☁️ G-Core …and more.
❤5

Channel
@Polymarket_Labs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
408,227subscribers
-3,904 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002164490288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Polymarket_Labs |
| Description | 📡 Real-time prediction market edge & intelligence 📊 Odds momentum • Whale bets • Market narratives ⚡️ Stay ahead of sentiment shifts BD: @TonAppNet |
| Created | 25 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Polymarket_Labs |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 408,227 | -457 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 408,684 | -659 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 409,343 | -796 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 410,139 | -672 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 410,811 | -930 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 411,741 | -390 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 412,131 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 412,131 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 25 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (25 June 2024 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,060 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 107 | 87.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 6.56% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2024 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☁️ Paying for Cloud Services? Your infrastructure shouldn't be limited by payment. 💳 Use MPay Visa Card ⚡️ Top up with USDT 🌍 Pay cloud providers worldwide Supported platforms include: ☁️ Hetzner ☁️ OVHcloud ☁️ Cloudflare ☁️ G-Core …and more.
❤5
⏱️⚔️ TIME WAR IS HERE! ⚔️⏱️ 🎯 Stop the timer closest to 9.00 seconds and claim your victory! 🎁 Get 2 TON Welcome Bonus 🏆 Play, compete, and win rewards 👥 Invite friends and earn 3% lifetime referral rewards ⚡️ Powered by TON Blockchain 🔥 HOW TO CLAIM YOUR 2 TON BONUS: • Join our official Telegram channel: https://t.me/tokenxgames • Open TOKENXGAMES using your invite link: 🚀 PLAY TIME WAR NOW 🎮 🎮 PLAY → ⚔️ COMPE…
❤7🔥2
🥷 This morning, almost nobody knew the account called “jewishNinja.” Now everyone does. 🔗 Profile: http://polymarket.com/@jewishninja During the UFC matchup between Sean Strickland vs Khamzat Chimaev… He dropped a massive $240,109 position on Strickland to win. At the time, the entire market was overwhelmingly betting on Khamzat. 📉 Odds were heavily skewed. 😂 People were literally laughing at the trade. Then Strickl…
❤22🔥4
👀 There’s a wallet I’ve been watching for a long time. Its entry logic kept me thinking the entire night. 💸 2 cents. 💸 4 cents. 💸 8 cents. While the entire market keeps saying: “This outcome only has a 2% chance of happening.” This bot quietly answers: “The market is wrong.” 🔗 Wallet Profile: https://polymarket.com/@xuanxuan008 📊 Real trades from the wallet: • $30 → $624 • $179 → $772 • $36 → $461 • $9 → $381 The in…
❤12👍1🔥1
Here’s a Telegram-ready English version you can copy directly: A 19-year-old student from California built a weather prediction trading bot for Polymarket. 📌The bot is now generating an average of $2,100 per week. His total profit has already reached $6,000 — and this is probably just the beginning. 📣What makes this story interesting is that he started from absolute zero. ⭐️After reading several articles about Polyma…
❤9🔥1
Here’s a polished Telegram-ready English version you can copy directly: I finally found the trader who turned Polymarket into a literal money printer. His results are almost impossible to believe: Started with just $5K. Scaled it into more than $6.5 million. And no — he’s not some insider. Doesn’t know Trump. Doesn’t know Elon. Just a coder running a script. I reverse-engineered his setup and honestly got shocked. No…
❤10
I uncovered a quant bot on Polymarket with a 99.3% win rate. It somehow turned $2,500 into $862,000. Sounds unreal — until you see the data. Here’s exactly how I reverse-engineered it 👇 1️⃣ Scraped 29,000+ prediction records and fed them into Codex 5.5 for analysis 2️⃣ Ran 72 million backtests across different market conditions and volatility scenarios 3️⃣ Deployed everything through Hermes Agent on a VPS 4️⃣ Conne…
❤42🌚4👏1😱1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Polymarket_Labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Polymarket Labs|Prediction Market Signals” (@Polymarket_Labs), 408,227 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Polymarket_Labs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.