Channel
@pronfti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,456subscribers
-103 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001194530865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pronfti |
| Description | Здесь вы найдете все о мире NFT ✅По вопросам сотрудничества: 1️⃣Telegram: https://t.me/PBM_Agent_bot 2️⃣Менеджер: @problockchain_sales 3️⃣Почта: sales@pro-blockchain.com , gptvinccorp@gmail.com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pronfti |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 20,456 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 20,476 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 20,500 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 20,514 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 20,534 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 20,552 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 20,559 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 20,559 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,647 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
📈 Kalshi запускает доступ к спортивным и криптовалютным перпетуальным данным через сеть DoubleZero Платформа Kalshi расширяет свои возможности, предоставляя доступ к данным о спортивных и крипто перпетуальных контрактах через специализированную оптоволоконную сеть DoubleZero, что улучшит доступ к данным для институциональных инвесторов. @PRO NFT
🔔 Fidelity подала заявку в SEC на добавление стейкинга в свой ETF на Ethereum! 85% вознаграждений будут удерживаться в фонде FETH, а также планируются квартальные денежные распределения для инвесторов. @PRO NFT
📉 Биткоин-майнеры зафиксировали новый исторический минимум: доход от транзакционных сборов составляет всего 0,52% от общего дохода. Эта тенденция вызывает беспокойство, поскольку майнеры начинают переключаться на технологии искусственного интеллекта в условиях сжатия прибыли. Ситуация на рынке требует внимания, так как такие изменения могут повлиять на будущие стратегии в сфере майнинга. @PRO NFT
📉 Общественные майнеры добавили $1.78 миллиарда давления на продажу на рынок биткоина. Эта группа остается недооцененной и вносит значительный вклад в предложение BTC, что может повлиять на ценовые колебания. @PRO NFT
🚢 ADI Chain и Shipfinex объединили усилия для токенизации морского флота стоимостью $500 млн! Shipfinex планирует перевести на блокчейн 35 судов с помощью ADI Chain, что открывает новые горизонты для токенизации в многотриллионной морской индустрии. @PRO NFT
🇷🇺 Центральный банк России предложил разрешить торговлю биткоином, эфиром и USDT на регулируемых биржах. Это решение стало возможным после подписания закона президентом Владимиром Путиным на прошлой неделе. @PRO NFT
🔍 Хак Coldcard: расследователи определяют потери в биткоинах В результате взлома Coldcard пока нет точной цифры потерь. Расследователи основываются на отчетах жертв и анализе данных в блокчейне, что приводит к различным оценкам убытков. @PRO NFT
🤖 Anthropic заключила сделку на $9 миллиардов с майнером биткоинов Riot! Согласно сообщениям, компания Anthropic договорилась о поставке 191 мегаватта мощности с кампуса Rockdale в Техасе, управляемого Riot. Это сотрудничество подчеркивает растущий интерес к вычислительным мощностям, необходимым для работы в области искусственного интеллекта и блокчейн-технологий. @PRO NFT
💰 Платформа Decta начинает использование USDC для международных расчетов через инфраструктуру OpenPayd. Цель - ускорение трансакций и более эффективное управление ликвидностью. @PRO NFT
🏛️ Белый дом заявил о намерении довести законопроект CLARITY до завершения в сентябре. Патрик Уитт сообщил, что администрация Трампа продолжит переговоры с демократами, пока Сенат готовится к голосованию по законопроекту в сентябре. @PRO NFT
🪙 Большой шаг для Solana: кредитный гигант Jupiter запускает продукт Lend v2, который позволяет одному доллару зарабатывать дважды! 💰 Новый продукт превращает депозиты и заемные активы в торговую ликвидность, связывая более высокие доходы с возможностью маршрутизатора Jupiter отправлять достаточный объем свопов в новые хранилища. @PRO NFT
📈 Биткоин достиг нового максимума августа в преддверии выхода отчета по инфляции в США. В прошедшее воскресенье актив показал значительный рост, что свидетельствует о повышенном интересе участников рынка к предстоящим данным о потребительских ценах. Рынок ожидает, что эти показатели могут повлиять на решение ФРС о приостановке повышения процентных ставок. @PRO NFT
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @pronfti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,256 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO NFT” (@pronfti), 20,456 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pronfti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.