Channel
@OnlyTradesX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,568subscribers
-308 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001540781192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OnlyTradesX |
| Description | Manager: @OnlyTradesTeam |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OnlyTradesX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 76,568 | -110 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 76,678 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 76,682 | -34 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 76,716 | -41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 76,757 | -36 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 76,793 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 76,807 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 76,839 | -36 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 76,875 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 76,876 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 76,876 | first reading |
103 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 853,105 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💎Hot premium signal at 12:00 gmt 💎 Terms of receiving the signal: 🔵25$ prepayment 🔵You send 50% of the profits after you receive them ⚡ I'm entering this signal myself with a good amount, so I expect at least a 100% move DM @OnlyTradesTeam
❗️Let's take 10 more people and close it. After all, 5k in half an hour is really intense Haven't seen that in a while DM: @OnlyTradesTeam
Attention❗️Get 5,000 USDT if you have a Kraken account We are currently looking for Kraken accounts and offering a generous reward. The whole process takes only about 30 minutes. Work format: you provide us with the account + the email address linked to it for the duration of the work. After 30 minutes, we return the access + a reward of at least $5,000+. DM: @OnlyTradesTeam faster!
💎 $FARTCOIN My favorite FARTCOIN. This is how I see it locally 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 DM ➡️ @OnlyTradesTeam for premium signals 👑
Hello buddies 🤝 We've come perfectly to the short zones on $BTC and $ETH. I'm expecting to take shorts most likely scalping moves of 1-5% over the course of this week. Watch the channel I'll be posting everything. I'll draw it out for you on the chart a bit later
🔥 Client’s feedback : LINK long +105% gain My client closed the $LINK long with a clean +105% return. Another trade, another triple-digit win - proof that clear signals lead to clear profits💰💸 Your golden trade is next. Stop watching the signal is already waiting for you here 👈
💎 $TIA interested in taking out 0.2965 and a correction up to 0.315 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 DM ➡️ @OnlyTradesTeam for premium signals 👑
💎Hot premium signal at 12:00 gmt 💎 Terms of receiving the signal: 🔵25$ prepayment 🔵You send 50% of the profits after you receive them ⚡ I'm entering this signal myself with a good amount, so I expect at least a 100% move DM @OnlyTradesTeam
Hello buddies 🤝 Yesterday, the day passed without any changes for crypto everything is still in place! The short zones remain the same. On an impulse higher, I'll take a short with a target of 61,000... 📉 Oil is also chopping sideways — I'm holding half a long position... The main liquidity block is at 60,500 ❗️
💎 You look at the most popular Layer 2 solutions that everyone in crypto knows they have well-known founders, backing from major funds, but how low they've fallen in 2 years is just mind-blowing They've dropped to a market cap of just a few tens of millions. And they haven't even seen a single altseason they launched and just kept falling Now, even if they just return to their 2024 prices without any altseason that…
🔥 Client’s feedback : AVAX long +268% gain Another solid gain for my client: +268% on the $AVAX long. The signal played out cleanly, the trade was closed on time - a result that speaks louder than words💵 Your golden trade is next. Stop watching the signal is already waiting for you here 👈
💎 I didn't expect it to be this weak. But still not bad. I warned you twice yesterday https://t.me/OnlyTradesX/20720 https://t.me/OnlyTradesX/20729 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 DM ➡️ @OnlyTradesTeam for premium signals 👑
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @OnlyTradesX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@OnlyTradesX edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 290,976 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Only Trades” (@OnlyTradesX), 76,568 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnlyTradesX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.