Channel
@braincrypto_eu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003223234874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @braincrypto_eu |
| Description | Description (add later) |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/braincrypto_eu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 5 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📢 Remember the posts (1,2) where I announced cashback for losing accounts on MEXC? Since then, we've already returned over $10,000 to our subscribers But the questions keep coming: "How do you do it?" So here's how 〰️〰️ 🤖 We created special software that trades scalp trades On average, it closes 60 trades per hour with a 71% win rate On the account shown in the video, here's the hourly stats: ✅ Profitable trades…
💎 Until now, the private group was closed Only for our own. For those who've been with us for a long time, proven over time. But after these results, I realized I want to give you a chance to earn too. So now I'm opening the doors to new people. But not for long
🔥 Results from our private group: Coin | Result | Leverage $PUMP| +126% | 5x $AKE | +195% | 3x $BLESS | +177% | 2x $ZEC| +39% | 5x $FARTCOIN| +41% | 7x $XMR| +17% | 5x Notice the leverage. We work with 2-5x we don't chase 20-50x because we know the price of risk. That's exactly what allows us to enter large positions from $10,000 to $100,000+ without the fear of losing everything 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ We have solid…
✅ Yeah Bitcoin really tested the nerves but it went exactly where we expected it to
‼️ FED interest rate decision! No change The market went up - manipulation
🔥Client's profit: XRP short +$172 My client closed the $XRP short with a solid +$172 profit and +96% return. Even through a busy schedule, the trade was executed and the profit was locked in. It doesn't matter what your starting capital is - together we will multiply it consistently and guaranteed💸🤑 👀Your golden trade is next. Stop watching - the signal is already waiting for you. DM @OnlyTradesTeam
Help came from an unexpected place 🤣 Durov will not be handed over to Russia, even with an international arrest warrant said his French lawyer, Philippe de Vell. France does not extradite its own citizens; it is directly prohibited by law Durov received French citizenship in 2021 The macaron guys got involved in the hustle 🐸🐸🐸
💎 $ZEC should give a reaction after taking out $443 and possibly $437 Free private channel 👉 @OnlyTradesTeam
💎 Thanks Uncle Trump. For yet another trade on oil Which number is this 10th in a row? Lately, we've learned to read oil flawlessly 🛢So let's do this if you want to build a good position on oil, write here, and we'll pick one specifically for your deposit ➡️ @OnlyTradesTeam
💎 $BTC My logic we're at a retest of the channel! If we break above 65,000 now, that's the start of a rise to 67,000! If instead we paint a reversal downward, then we fly down, and after taking out the low, we go higher There's tons of liquidity both above and below, funding is positive, today is the Fed and I would expect more negativity We'll see what happens everyone thinks for themselves!
💎 PREMIUM TRADE REPORT $XRP (LONG) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ENTRY: 1.0515 DCA ADD: 1.0210 EXIT: 1.0912 RESULT: +75% on 15x (+5% net) PROFIT: +$1,887 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE SETUP: ▫️ First entry at 1.0515 -local support zone ▫️ Price faked below structure retail panic ▫️ DCA at 1.0210 deviation into the liquidity grab ▫️ Volume confirmed smart money accumulation EXIT: ▫️ 100% position closed at 1.0912 ▫️ One clean take-profit …
💎 The official Telegram account on Twitter, following the news of Durov being charged with aiding terrorism
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @braincrypto_eu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Test Brain 🧠” (@braincrypto_eu), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braincrypto_eu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.