本轮熊底,该指标最高达到 84.2%
🔥10🤯8
Signed CryptoChan

Channel
@Crypto_Chan01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,495subscribers
+49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001581152552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_Chan01 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_Chan01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 4,495 | +30 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 4,465 | +21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 4,444 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 4,443 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 4,449 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 4,446 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 4,446 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,984 |
| Reactions total | 150 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
302 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 78 | 25.8% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 22.2% | |
| 😱 | 64 | 21.2% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 17.9% | |
| 🤪 | 20 | 6.62% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 2.65% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.66% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.993% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.662% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.331% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto_Chan01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
本轮熊底,该指标最高达到 84.2%
🔥10🤯8
Signed CryptoChan
【指标更新】橙了
❤10👍6👏1
Signed CryptoChan
$BTC 熊底绿柱出的差不多咯🔫
🔥8👍3
Signed CryptoChan
【BTC熊底左侧九九八十一天定投打卡】 今日第八八六十四天定投完成,进度条还剩 17 天
👍9
Signed CryptoChan
大 V 天龙‼️ ┌── 🐼 链上数据详情 ──┐ 图中指标衡量的是持币不足 3 个月的“新资金/热钱”占比特币全网已实现市值的比例,用来反映市场的投机狂热度与大周期的顶底位置 该指标在熊底 V 反说明短线玩家从净离场切换到净入场,或代表熊市结束、牛市开启
😱15🔥2😨2
Signed CryptoChan
【 $BTC 四年周期总刻系列 (43)】 2019年01月26日:该指标升至 0.856 2022年10月10日:该指标升至 0.856 当前:该指标升至 0.856 ┌─ 链上数据详情 ─┐ 图中上方灰线为BTC价格;红线为链上持币6-12个月的筹码平均买入成本;蓝线为链上持币1-2年的筹码平均买入成本;图中下方指标为蓝线跟红线之比
❤7
Signed CryptoChan
2015年该指标峰值跟2019年该指标峰值相差 1385天 2019年该指标峰值跟2023年该指标峰值相差 1380天 2023年该指标峰值距今已有 1300天 ┌── 🐼 指标详情 ──┐ 图中下方指标为“链上长期持币者平均购币成本”跟“链上短期持币者平均购币成本”之比 历史上该指标峰值的出现往往意味着熊市结束、牛市开启
🔥8❤3
Signed CryptoChan
这波扎实回踩 当前比特币中位数购币成本: $62,748
🔥7❤3🤪3
Signed CryptoChan
死叉稳步收尾中
🤪16🥰5❤3
Signed CryptoChan
📌 2014年:币价跌破绿线后124天到熊底 📌 2018年:币价跌破绿线后188天到熊底 📌 2022年:币价跌破绿线后193天到熊底 📌 2026年:币价跌破绿线后146天到 $57.8k ┌── 🐼 链上数据详情 ──┐ 图中绿线为 LTH Spent Price(长期持币者花费价格),是当天由长期持有者(持仓≥155天)卖出的BTC的平均购入成本。它反映的是这批被花费(卖出)筹码的加权平均买币成本 当币价跌破 LTH Spent Price 并持续100余天直至熊底时,意味着长期持有者已进入持续亏损抛售阶段。这反映市场进入深度投降期,连强手也被清洗,历史上对应熊市末期、周期底部临近的典型信号
❤5🔥3
Signed CryptoChan
本轮 $BTC 已摸200周均线
🔥9😱3❤1
Signed CryptoChan
右侧或已突破
😱24❤5🤔3
Signed CryptoChan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crypto_Chan01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 562,699 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTC链上行情分析” (@Crypto_Chan01), 4,495 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Chan01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.