Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔥МоскалькоV🔥

@MoskalkovSB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

27,152subscribers

-76 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188387499
TypeChannel
Username@MoskalkovSB
DescriptionУдарим красивым пением по культурной оккупации! Для комментариев: https://t.me/+wcpMFFQmsapkYzcy РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6967bcc6b3439ea1ff09c427 Связь, реклама вопросы: @moskalkovs_bot Помочь каналу (аппаратура): Сбер: 5336690180760177
Created6 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MoskalkovSB

Growth

27,15227,22827,1905 August 2026 — 27,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,224 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,213 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,203 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,193 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,177 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,162 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,152 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,141–27,239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:1427,152-10
11 Aug 2026, 14:0227,162-15
10 Aug 2026, 10:3527,177-16
9 Aug 2026, 07:5427,193-10
8 Aug 2026, 11:1927,203-10
7 Aug 2026, 10:2027,213-11
6 Aug 2026, 08:4027,224-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:0127,228no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1027,228first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 27,152 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,650
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.934%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held51 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total338,974
Reactions total3,165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,150
Videos
2,720
Links
8,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 50s
Average length
2m 28s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,751 reactions across 44 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
76727.9%
💯45216.4%
👍36513.3%
🙏29010.5%
🤣2719.85%
🔥1836.65%
🤬1706.18%
👏632.29%
🤔411.49%
😱331.20%
🤝301.09%
🤯240.872%
👎190.691%
🎉100.364%
🤨80.291%
😡70.254%
❤‍🔥50.182%
🥴40.145%
30.109%
😢20.073%
4 further kinds40.145%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 51 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MoskalkovSB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC894 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ха, ха❗️ Рэперша Инстасамка (настоящее имя — Дарья Еропкина) опровергла собственное заявление об отъезде из России и уходе с российского музыкального рынка. Соответствующий пост она разместила в Instagram (принадлежит компании Meta, признанной экстремистской организацией и запрещенной в РФ). Исполнительница сообщила, что просто решила привлечь к себе внимание в преддверии выхода нового трека «Лишь раз». «Я не то чт

🤣45🤬83👎21👌1

11 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC954 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bIoodsikerVideo

Выступающего против мигрантов депутата от КПРФ Михаила Матвеева хотят снять с выборов Самарский областной суд рассмотрит иск 12 августа. Иск против регистрации Матвеева подала зарегистрированный кандидат от «Российской партии пенсионеров за социальную справедливость» Анна Саранцева Одна из претензий в адрес Матвеева заключается в том, что во ВКонтакте и Телеграм, где он ведет свои страницы, используется шрифт прина

🤬118🙏17🤨4🤣3😢1

11 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈2,190 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всё, что вы хотели знать о культурной политике, но боялись спрашивать. (с) Певица* Инстасамка (настоящее имя — Дарья Еропкина) 11 августа заявила, что не планирует возвращаться в Россию и намерена полностью сосредоточиться на международной карьере. «И вы всё спрашиваете: «Даша, а ты уехала? А ты приедешь? А ты переехала? А ты вернешься?» Нет, друзья. Я не вернусь. Я не вернусь по многим причинам, но основная из них

💯52🤬26🤣21🎉1

11 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC981 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kultyrni_frontPhoto

Точное время установления празднования Рождества свт. Николая Чудотворца на Руси неизвестно. Прямые свидетельства о праздновании Рождества Святителя в Новгороде относятся к XVI веку. В Чиновнике Софийского собора записано, что празднование сопровождалось крестным ходом «от Софеи к Николе Чудотворцу на Розважу» [1]. В 1556 году в Новгороде был основан монастырь, посвященный Рождеству Святителя, как говорится в летопис

39🙏19🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,040 views37 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Действительно гениальное стихотворение! #поэзия

💯265👍4🔥1🙏1

10 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,020 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Боюсь представить, что будет, если я им Риголетто запою.) #пение #шутка_юмора

🤣35🤯4👎2

10 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,080 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ещё пишут, что "российские песни" звучали в перерыве. Не уточнили только, на "российском" языке или всё-таки на русском? #позорище #русские #русский_язык

🤯18🤬15😡6🤣2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,060 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @merussiatgPhoto

41-летняя москвичка стала мамой в 15-й раз В августе на свет появилась девочка Вера, ставшая 15-м ребенком в семье Надежды и Ивана Роговых. Теперь супруги воспитывают 15 детей: 10 дочерей и 5 сыновей. Всех детей Надежда Рогова родила естественным путем, без эпидуральной анестезии: Бог дает детей, и они приходят, а вместе с каждым малышом Бог дает больше сил и любви. Мне кажется, главное — ко всему относиться проще,

75🙏41🔥3👍2👎2😱1

10 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,030 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А почему нет статьи за дискредитацию тыла? #внутреняя_политика

👍279👏3🤣1

9 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC≈1,260 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Добавлю к посту Юрия, что фраза "но не паникуйте б..ть, дайте повоевать, мы можем", на мой взгляд, могла иметь место в контексте личной переписки, но, в публичном поле, как обобщение, мягко говоря, неправдоподобная. Не буду развивать, чтобы....ну, кто в теме, тот меня поймёт. #война #инфовойна #Баранчик

17👍3

9 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,250 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @holmogor_talks

Пугать кореянками страну Виктора Цоя и Татьяны Ким - это они здорово придумали. https://t.me/majorselivanov/18225

🤣86🤝144👎1

9 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,260 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Карфаген? #история #война #Холмогоров

🤝16👍5💯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @MoskalkovSB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 69,603 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Два майора
@dva_majors · 1,163,531
3 posts
Андрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 185,028
3 posts
Картавых Александр
@AlexCarrier · 147,575
2 posts
Егор Холмогоров
@holmogor_talks · 19,737
2 posts
🔥 Культурный фронт Z 🔥
@kultyrni_front · 13,126
2 posts
Россия — это я!
@merussiatg · 50,968
2 posts
Банкста
@banksta · 437,556
1 post
Юрий Баранчик
@barantchik · 90,815
1 post
Александр Пелевин Z
@comradepelevin · 20,028
1 post
Русский тарантасъ
@DmitriySteshin · 137,074
1 post
Майорский кOртиZол
@dva_mjors_kOrtiZoL · 12,763
1 post
ИРИ
@irirussia · 14,606
1 post
Книжный Капибаръ
@kapibar_books · 459
1 post
Карельский бальзам | Новости
@KB_Announcments · 44,628
1 post
Друзья майора Селиванова
@majorselivanov · 9,132
1 post
Mash
@mash · 3,112,068
1 post
Информационная служба Московской (городской) епархии
@pravmos · 2,546
1 post
real cultras
@real_cultras · 24,376
1 post
Русский инженер
@rusengineer · 124,419
1 post
Сыны Монархии/Роман Антоновский
@SonOfMonarchy · 87,326
1 post
ЦАРИННА
@tsar_inna · 6,738
1 post
Протоиерей Андрей Ткачев
@videotca_Andrea · 285,253
1 post
Нам нельзя назад | Юрий Высоков
@yvysokov · 890
1 post
Zlawyers. Русские юристы
@zlawyers · 26,849
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q130417172 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelNo label recorded on this Wikidata item

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Москальков, Сергей Борисович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…Римского-Корсакова) == Примечания == {{примечания}} == Ссылка == * [https://t.me/MoskalkovSB/241 Донбасская варшавянка] («Бейте по центрам принятья решений…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥МоскалькоV🔥” (@MoskalkovSB), 27,152 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoskalkovSB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.