Channel
@f77o7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,570subscribers
-1,951 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002242175086 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @f77o7 @jpzbg101 |
| Description | 今日头条大事件，每日分享东南亚最新新闻资讯及行业曝光 各类骗子 黑台 失信曝光 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 #越南 #迪拜 #马来西亚 #斯里南卡 #格鲁吉亚 #老挝 曝光频道： https://t.me/jinribaoguang88 投稿爆料： @XIAO8445 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/f77o7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 14,570 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 14,576 | -503 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 15,079 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 15,085 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 15,096 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 15,097 | -161 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 15,258 | -114 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 15,372 | -415 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 15,787 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 15,788 | -31 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 15,819 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 15,820 | -44 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 15,864 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 15,873 | -597 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 16,470 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 16,471 | -50 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 16,521 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 16,521 | first reading |
178 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 178 (7 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,849 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#网友爆料：奥斯马小树林（妈咪九九）携巨款跑路，被曝光私吞客人挂账和女孩工资之后消失不见！ 把群里的聊天证据也删除了，也跟所有有关的联系人拉黑、删除，女孩子都找不到她了，彻底跑路了。飞机名字和微信名字也改了。 这个九九丧尽天良，黑了客人挂账钱和女孩工资，不得好死。已经跟多位客人核实，钱都转给她了，她到处污蔑客人没结账。客人发信息质问她，她选择逃避、跑路、删除信息。 九九原来是卖逼的小姐，在拜林和波贝坐台卖身，不好上班，没赚到钱。后来跑到奥斯马铁皮房卖逼，也没赚到钱。 后来认识阿伤，带她来小树林做了妈咪！阿伤是天子集团一个分公司的小代理，跟九九两个人同流合污，穿一条路子，坑害客人和女孩们。 黑客户的挂账，说小灰、浪白、大壮、木总……五六个客人没结给她！其实都是她编造谎言，忽悠女孩和公司，损害了公司、客人、扶手三方面的利益！ 我们组女孩恳请奥斯马小树林老板出来主持公道，让九九这个卖逼的和阿伤把不该属于她俩的钱吐出来！归还…
#网友爆料：我是4月2日来到斯里兰卡的受害者之一。 以下是相关人员信息：老板：11（主要负责人）；辰安：大股东，现身在柬埔寨，别以为没你信息，你和我一个航班出来的；邹建波 EN6711***（老板亲戚）；龚鑫 EJ2750***（跟随老板多年的管理人员）；罗超 EJ880***（跟随老板多年的管理人员）；饶小康 EL8147***（跟随老板多年的后勤主管兼公司代理）。 在决定来这里之前，我不是没有担心过安全问题，而是一次又一次地向老板确认：“斯里兰卡到底安不安全？来了会不会出问题？”得到的统一答复永远只有一句：“放心，包安全，没事。”正因为相信了这句话，我们才一个个来到了这里。可谁能想到，来了一月多以后，还是出了事。在我们被抓之前两天，尼干布已经抓了很多人。期间，很多人第一时间去问老板：“现在到底什么情况？安全吗？我们怎么办？”老板给我们的回复依然是：“没事，安全得很。”结果呢？真正出事的那一天，老板和管理人员都不见了踪影。…
柬国家银行出台新规 简化银行配合司法查冻账户程序 柬埔寨国家银行（央行）发布最新通告，明确各银行及金融机构在提供客户账户信息以及执行扣押、冻结或解封账户时的义务，旨在加强并加速配合执法部门相关指令的法律程序。 根据通告，各金融机构须直接执行主管机关的法令或请求，无需再向国家银行申请确认，国家银行亦无权解释主管机关的操作指令。同时，相关人员仍须恪守《银行与金融机构法》第47条关于保守业务保密的规定。 以前从来没有这事儿 看来现在搞柬埔寨盘的太多了 柬埔寨人损失也不小 👀关注大事件频道➡️@f77o7 投稿 ：@XIAO8445
#网友投稿：柬埔寨金边3号安置点，滞留三个月迟迟不遣返，什么时候能给一个明确的说法？ 本人目前在柬埔寨金边3号安置点，已经滞留整整三个月。这边有太多的都是3个月以上都没回国的人！希望祖国早点处理我们的事情，远在海外的安置点！！ 当初是在酒店被带走，之后被安排到安置点。三个月过去了，到现在最想知道的仍然是：为什么迟迟不能遣返？目前到底办理到哪一步？还需要多久？有没有明确的时间安排？我们并不是要求特殊待遇，只希望相关部门能够把最基本的遣返流程和进度讲清楚。 现在最迫切的不是一句“等通知”，而是一个明确的流程和答复：目前身份核查是否已经完成？相关证件、材料是否已经齐全？如果不齐，到底缺什么？中国方面是否已经确认接收？目前卡在哪个环节？遣返手续是否已经提交？目前由哪个部门负责？如果需要集中包机遣返，下一批次大概是什么时候？如果暂时无法遣返，具体原因是什么？预计还需要等待多久？对已经滞留三个月甚至更久的人员，能否给出明确的处理时间表…
#巴基斯坦：伊斯兰堡斯帕科广场“Sparco Plaza大楼”372名狗推被抓事件最新画面！ 🇨🇳战歌响起～～～ 正在酝酿情绪中，准备开始发起冲锋了！！！ 👀关注大事件频道➡️@f77o7 投稿 ：@XIAO8445
#越南资讯：越南这次反诈可不是嘴上说说，是实打实落地执行了！ 新规要求外籍手机卡落实一人一卡、强实名复核，没有完成核验的号码，电话已经打不出去了，只能接电话，没法外呼、发短信。 眼下已经有不少外籍人士，去到营业厅排队，持护照办理重新激活。 说白了就是整治黑SIM、人头卡，不给电诈分子靠着匿名外籍号码实施跨境诈骗的机会。虽然正常出行、旅居的人会多一道线下手续，但从源头卡死通信通道，确实能压制跨境电信诈骗。 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @bp888 投稿：@bx561
#巴基斯坦：现场视频，伊斯兰堡Sparco Plaza大楼突查，现场共有372名“狗推”被抓。 千里迢迢赴巴铁，满怀希望赚大钱； 键盘敲得震天响，转眼统一蹲成排。 本想兄弟情长久，谁知铁拳不认人； 出师未捷身先死，发财梦碎Sparco。 👀关注大事件频道➡️@f77o7 投稿 ：@XIAO8445
#缅甸资讯：泰缅边境山谷被曝新诈骗据点，距泰国边境仅约700米 据泰国 Natty Loves Myanmar 披露，缅甸克伦邦 War Mee Hta（瓦米塔）村附近被发现一处疑似新建网络诈骗据点，位置靠近泰国达府朴帕县 Ban Wale Tai 一带，距离泰国边境仅约700米，距离泰方乡村公路约1公里。 现场调查显示，该建筑群隐藏在山谷和玉米地后方，从泰国一侧并不容易直接发现。调查人员在实地拍摄中记录到有车辆向区域内运输物资，现场也停放有多辆汽车，显示当地仍存在人员活动及建设迹象。 通过现场信息及卫星图像比对，War Mee Hta附近至少还有3处地点疑似正在形成新的诈骗据点。与此同时，当地曾通过TikTok招募安保人员前往相关区域，并有司机称曾运送涉诈从业人员进入附近据点。 相关调查认为，在妙瓦底一带大型诈骗园区持续受到清查和外部压力后，部分网络可能正从大型集中园区转向山区、山谷及更隐蔽的边境地带。 👀关注大事件…
#网友爆料：这个地方叫做云基，里面就一栋别墅，全是做国内A股的。 这次被抓是被本地人举报的，里面很多傻狗点外卖送到门口。我以前也是这个公司的，后来因为一些事情离职来西港了。里面我兄弟他们过几天就要关盘了，都约好过几天一起来西港玩了，唉，没想到还是落网了。 奉劝打野的同胞不要点外卖直接送到打野公司楼下，本地人很喜欢举报这种的，有类似于“线人”的奖励费用。 PS：打击以后本地人没钱挣，举报还有点钱，都注意点吧 👀关注大事件频道➡️@f77o7 投稿 ：@XIAO8445
#网友投稿：木牌壹号公路和平酒店准备谈判失败，二楼看上去就有点类似办公桌敲键盘的东西，目测应该是打野，上二楼抱头了。 👀关注大事件频道➡️@f77o7 投稿 ：@XIAO8445
#老挝资讯：今年已打击逮捕超5000名网络犯罪嫌疑人 据相关消息，2026年以来，老挝当局持续加大对网络诈骗、电话诈骗及网络赌博等违法犯罪活动的打击力度。截至目前，全国累计已有超过5000名网络犯罪嫌疑人被查处，其中包括诈骗人员、电话诈骗人员以及涉网络赌博人员。 据悉，今年1月至7月期间，老挝各地执法部门持续开展针对网络犯罪团伙的突击行动，共拘留近4500人，涉案人员来自中国、泰国、越南、马来西亚、巴西及老挝等多个国家。 其中，7月在班东坡西（Ban Dong Pho Si）开展的一次大规模行动中，警方捣毁一个涉嫌从事网络诈骗和网络赌博活动的团伙，共逮捕589人，其中包括373名泰国人、199名老挝人、15名越南人以及2名柬埔寨人。同时，执法人员现场查获超过1万台电脑及手机等电子设备。 进入8月初，老挝警方又在塔銮经济特区展开行动，对当地一家赌场及涉嫌从事网络赌博活动的场所进行搜查，共拘留261人，涉及7个不同国籍。其中…
#网友投稿：西湖酒店、南海酒店方面，老板洪哥曾亲自派人前往国内，送苹果给豪老板，并以“低调方能保平安”之类的话语进行提醒。 对此，豪老板在视频中直言回应：就算是洪哥拿枪顶着他的脑袋，他也不会害怕，并表示“不要跟我玩这一套”。豪老板还称，自己这些年经历过各种风风雨雨，什么样的大场面、大风浪都见过，不会因为几句话或者所谓的威胁就低头，更不会因此改变自己的态度。 视频中，豪老板态度十分强硬，并放话称，自己一定要想办法将洪哥弄回国，还要曝光洪哥和洗米华的秘密。 整件事情从“送苹果”到“提醒低调”，再到豪老板公开强硬回应，双方之间的矛盾也因此进一步引发关注。究竟是谁在施压、谁在示弱、谁又真正掌握主动权。 👀关注大事件频道➡️@f77o7 投稿 ：@XIAO8445
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @f77o7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 951,943 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“soso东南亚-大事件Top🔥” (@f77o7), 14,570 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f77o7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.