⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ #东南亚顶级高爆电子台!😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌 USDT存出款,东南亚盘总首选U台👍不限ip 😝😍🥰😝#在122平台用200人民币中220万大奖是什么体验?查看视频 👈 爆奖时间:2026-10-12 玩家充值3万人民币,仅用200一拉直接爆了11000倍史诗级巨奖 提款326800U秒到账 ❗️❗️ 😍再创新高:2026年3月30 某盘总在122体育pg麻将1中2万一拉爆出1300万的惊天巨奖 😍震撼来袭:2026年1月4号 金边某盘总在122体育极速糖果仅用500爆得500万超级巨奖 雪中送炭不如锦上添花: 单笔出款100万 额外奖励8888 单笔出款300万 额外奖励28888 单笔出款500万 额外奖励58888 单笔出款800万 额外奖励88888 单笔出款1000万 额外奖励128888 122体育18年…

Channel
东南亚狗推(吃瓜)
@dongnanya866
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58,340subscribers
+2,091 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001689775623 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dongnanya866 |
| Description | 东南亚吃瓜投稿爆料!🤝 东南亚狗推八卦爆料!🤝 东南亚狗推吃瓜故事!🤝 建议您选择理性性观看!🤝 商务合作联系: @bt555 防失联导航频道: @dsjdny88 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dongnanya866 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:11 | 58,340 | -473 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:24 | 58,813 | -452 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:31 | 59,265 | -230 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 59,495 | -220 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 59,715 | -204 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 59,919 | -335 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:26 | 60,254 | -2,327 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:27 | 62,581 | -2,628 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 65,209 | -905 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 66,114 | -4,057 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:35 | 70,171 | -489 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 70,660 | -321 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 70,981 | -734 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 71,715 | -295 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 72,010 | -316 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 72,326 | -469 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 72,795 | -416 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:19 | 73,211 | -358 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 73,569 | -514 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 74,083 | first reading |
Engagement
1,779 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.38%
- avg views ÷ 58,340 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 806
- 629 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.132%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 629
- of 1,779 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 629 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,779 (8 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 506,901 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 00:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈14,000
- Videos
- ≈15,600
- Links
- ≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7h 36m
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 722 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
111 reactions across 109 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 49 | 44.1% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 10.8% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 9.01% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 9.01% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 8.11% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 7.21% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 5.41% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 3.60% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 September 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 629 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉台|玩家首选 #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合平台 集团耗资2亿美金 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台 🇺🇸🇻🇳🇷🇪🇻🇪🇺🇸🇻🇳 #大玩家首选 免实名 免手机号 电子最高可拉2万一转 支持USDT K豆 OKpay 等20多种虚拟币钱包 👌微信 👌支付宝 银行卡存取款 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😘2028体育精彩时刻: 3月31号 柬埔寨西港狗推PG电子单笔提300万 4月13号 盘总级玩家麻将胡单笔提款2000万 5月15号 泰国盘总推荐大哥首存提款600万 6月15号 缅甸大哥麻将胡了爆奖励提款470万 7月11号 泰国盘总完美对子真人视讯提款580万 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 #全网福利天花板 1、首存送 复存送 投注送 劳力士豪车嫩模!! 2、电子黄金周 周一至周日福利拿不停! 3、单笔出款100万奖励最高 8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣ …
🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ TG全网频道联合担保(电子)😀😀😀😀😀 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😄😄😄😄 #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合😃台 集团储备10亿美金 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台。 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 电子单注😀😀😀😀一拉 全网最高 真人限红😀😀😀😀一注 全网最高 😘Y3国际爆奖喜讯来袭: 【7月24号】柬埔寨西港玩家PP电子盈利150万U 【6月26号】缅甸盘总DB视讯单笔提款426万 【6月19号】马来盘总在DB视讯赢走550万 【#Y3国际|全网福利天花板】 新用户首存100U 彩金18U 新用户首存500U 彩金38U 新用户首存1000U 彩金88U 新用户首存3000U 彩金238U 新用户首存5000U 彩金358U 新用户首…
网红 黄银勋 动作也太快了 老黄出轨风波刚起 小黄赶紧找来一个酷似女主,准备蹭一波流量 黄仁勋 出轨事件 #流量密码 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
同道中人,库克 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
柬埔寨,太吓人了!在国外千万不要给陌生人开门!放在门口用来浇菜的尿素被两老外给偷喝了🤣🤣🤣 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
一个人的夜 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
羡慕吗 ?把玩 大奶子 #巨乳 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
这才是红果短剧能火的原因,真牛逼! 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
江西司机开车打瞌睡翻车事故 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
秦皇岛暴雪, 哈哈哈哈哈,其实不该笑,就是忍不住 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
邢台纪委落马 放鞭炮庆祝🎉 关注吃瓜频道➡️ @dongnanya866 投稿:@bt555
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,779 posts we hold for @dongnanya866. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@pg227 · 1,53683 posts122体育-官方福利频道 @PG521
@pg521 · 1,40783 postsY3国际-官方福利频道 @Y3VIPGF
@Y3VIPGF · 5,98770 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 31,48732 posts爱奇艺电影频道
@dianying988 · 67,1163 posts东南亚包厢文化DJ
@dongnanyadj8 · 31,9463 posts海外素材中心(臻选)
@sucai1388 · 60,3423 posts柬埔寨大事件
@djpz188 · 51,0912 posts菲律宾大事件
@fflb188 · 6,6382 posts老挝大事件
@llaowo18 · 12,0562 posts缅甸大事件
@mmiandian · 9,8032 posts马来西亚大事件
@mmlxy88 · 7,5882 posts泰国大事件
@ttaiguo · 14,0102 posts东南亚大事件
@txotxo · 49,3272 posts迪拜大事件
@wdubai188 · 36,4792 posts新加坡大事件
@xjiapo8 · 7,6162 posts越南大事件
@yyuenan · 9,5852 posts海外大事件(猎奇-吃瓜)
@aa144 · 34,6171 post东南亚狗推(吃瓜)
@MB_149 · 130,0761 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚狗推(吃瓜)” (@dongnanya866), 58,340 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dongnanya866.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.