Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

soso素材-海外素材Top🔥

@scbz666

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,551subscribers

-182 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003066467707
TypeChannel
Usernames@scbz666 @us244
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scbz666

Growth

16,55116,73316,6426 August 2026 — 16,733 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,733 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,696 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,674 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,674 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,661 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,659 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,624 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,624 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,605 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,604 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,581 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,577 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,552 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,551 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 7 days, net -182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,524–16,760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:4716,551-1
13 Aug 2026, 18:1616,552-25
12 Aug 2026, 21:5316,577-4
12 Aug 2026, 17:4516,581-23
11 Aug 2026, 21:0216,604-1
11 Aug 2026, 20:2216,605-19
10 Aug 2026, 23:1216,624no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:3416,624-35
9 Aug 2026, 21:5116,659-2
9 Aug 2026, 21:3116,661-13
9 Aug 2026, 00:5416,674no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:5316,674-22
7 Aug 2026, 21:3516,696-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:1416,697-36
6 Aug 2026, 22:4516,733no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:3916,733first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.382%
avg views ÷ 16,551 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.2
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held48 (6 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total3,035
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 23 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🦀🐡🐠🐟🐬🐳🐋🦈 😀 UU国际品牌,始终以信任与信誉为核心 ✅ 官网:😀 6A.com —— 实力铸就品牌 😀 新会员好礼🚜注册送28U 💎 首存500,送 68U! 💎 二三存再送 8888U! 💎 逢“6”现金大反馈! 💎 红包福袋,每日 8888U! 💎 实时返水1️⃣.3️⃣🔤起! 🗣👤👥🫂👶🪢🧶🧵🪡👍 😀(保证金查验🔎点击验证) 😃 PG电子连胡高能爆庄727万! 😃 PG麻将1小时爆奖304万! 😃 PA真人盘总当天兑现2190万! 🏆 千万域名保障 🦯 6A.com 😀 客服:@UUKF 😀 飞投:@UU6A 😀 频道:@ uuyl68 😀 代理:@uuzhaoshang 😀 亿级资金储备,打造顶级信誉品牌!

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#设计师日常 #上班日常 #服装 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC28 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#加拿大 #多伦多 #DT停车太贵了 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#美国 #波士顿 #波士顿钓螃蟹 #钓螃蟹 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC179 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#早餐 #通用 #日常 #分享 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC146 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#伦敦 #酒吧 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#瑞士🇨🇭 斯图加特附近小镇 #婚礼现场 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC101 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#布达佩斯 #氛围感餐厅 #西餐 #鹅肝 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#户外 烧烤 聚会 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#下午茶 #咖啡 #香港 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC118 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#巴黎 #下午茶 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

11 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC104 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#巧克力 #购物 关注海外素材频道➡️@us244 投稿:@lz7855

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @scbz666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 869,461 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“soso素材-海外素材Top🔥” (@scbz666), 16,551 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scbz666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.