#群友投稿:西港还是西港。 十年过去了,一个小渔村发展成了一个现代城市。法律制度、城市发展、营商环境,一切都在变。脱离了灰产之后,这座城市的未来会怎么样,谁也不知道! 2025.11—2016,政府打击各种犯罪。这里不再是电诈的温床,捞快钱已经成为过去。时代在变,人也在变。不努力就会被淘汰。 城市永远都在,你的青春和年龄,能够坚持住你梦想完成的那天吗?赚钱的速度是否会超过你老去的速度? 所以,应该好好赚钱,远离恶习。为自己积攒财富,也是给自己留一条路。 《这里曾经成就了多少富翁,也留下了多少尸骨。》 不管是正经生意,还是灰产捞钱,任何事情,风险和利益都是并存的。 2026年,一切都变得反复无常。本到了旱季,却每天都在下雨,连老天都在变脸。 现在的西港人烟稀少,未来的发展方向在哪里?是否已经做好了规划,再次为梦想起航呢? 📣关注大新闻频道 @HYY3333 ✅投稿爆料删帖 @zqq3333 👍代办激活护照 @zq…

Channel
东南亚大新闻
@HYY3333
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,669subscribers
+22,195 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002005603625 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HYY3333 |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #老挝 #缅甸 #泰国#马来西亚 交流群 @HYY1680 全球手机话费充值 @svip189bot 东南亚大新闻,全网资讯快人一步,拒绝信息时差,第一时间推送东南亚突发事件、灰产内幕与最新政策。 【最新】 实时追踪区域动态 【最快】 突发新闻秒速直达 tiktok公众号:tiktok.com/@hyy33334 投稿/曝光:@zqq3333 广告合作:@zqq3333 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HYY3333 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:07 | 101,669 | -365 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:22 | 102,034 | -738 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 04:00 | 102,772 | -1,371 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 104,143 | -1,969 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:26 | 106,112 | -322 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:39 | 106,434 | -122 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:59 | 106,556 | -260 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:27 | 106,816 | -127 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:40 | 106,943 | -423 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 107,366 | -749 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 108,115 | -860 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 108,975 | -2,413 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 111,388 | -2,894 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 114,282 | -692 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 114,974 | -1,050 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 116,024 | +5,659 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 110,365 | +18,995 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 91,370 | +10,859 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 80,511 | -2,114 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:11 | 82,625 | first reading |
Engagement
2,097 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.5%
- avg views ÷ 101,669 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 509
- 612 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.149%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 612
- of 2,097 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 98 of 612 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,097 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 311,241 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈40,900
- Videos
- ≈9,560
- Links
- ≈22,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 13m
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 299 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
126 reactions across 108 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 103 | 81.7% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 13.5% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 160 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 29 of 612 posts held from the last 30 days (4.74%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#马来西亚资讯:沙巴四地联合突击行动!107名非法移民落网,其中包括25名儿童 马来西亚沙巴州移民局于11月9日至11日期间,在亚庇、兵南邦、兰瑙及山打根展开多场联合执法行动,共扣留107名非法移民,其中包括25名儿童,另有一名雇主被扣留调查。 据当地媒体11月11日报道,移民局此次行动重点针对住宅区、商业场所、水疗中心及出租房间,严厉打击非法入境、非法居留及非法聘用外籍劳工等活动。 其中,11月11日,执法人员在山打根及兰瑙展开突击检查,共扣留71名外籍人士,包括68名菲律宾籍人员及3名印尼籍人员。 在山打根的行动中,执法人员凌晨1时35分展开突击检查,针对5处地点进行搜查,共检查83人,扣留50人,其中包括25名儿童。 与此同时,移民局也在兰瑙3处地点展开检查,共检查24人,扣留21名菲律宾籍人员。 另外,11月9日,移民局在亚庇及兵南邦展开执法行动,共检查312人,最终扣留36名外籍人士,包括34名菲律宾籍人员…
印尼警方在菲律宾秘密抓捕数十名网络诈骗嫌疑人,涉案人员正被押送回国 11月10日,印尼国家警察总长苏尤迪·阿里奥·塞托(Suyudi Ario Seto)透露,印尼警方近日在菲律宾展开秘密执法行动,成功抓获数十名涉嫌参与网络诈骗活动的人员,目前相关嫌疑人正被安排押送返回印尼。 据介绍,此次行动主要针对在菲律宾境内活动、以印尼国内民众为诈骗目标的跨境网络诈骗人员。 苏尤迪表示,警方已经成功控制一批涉案人员,并正在办理押送回国相关事宜,以便进一步调查案件。 目前,警方尚未公布具体抓捕人数、嫌疑人身份及诈骗团伙的详细情况。印尼警方表示,后续将由相关部门公布更多行动细节。 📣关注大新闻频道 @HYY3333 ✅投稿爆料删帖 @zqq3333 👍代办激活护照 @zqq3333 ✅商务广告合作 @zqq3333
😀😀😀😀吉打移民局突袭建筑工地,30名外籍人员被捕,涉及孟加拉、缅甸及印尼籍 11月10日上午,马来西亚吉打州移民局展开名为 Ops Sapu 的执法行动,突袭位于双溪大年 Bandar Amanjaya 的一处建筑工地,对现场49名外籍及本地人员进行身份检查。 行动中,执法人员共扣留30名涉嫌违反移民法令的外籍人员,其中包括17名孟加拉国籍、12名缅甸籍及1名印尼籍人员。据悉,被扣留人员包括27名男性及3名女性,年龄介于20岁至50岁之间。 行动结束后,30名被捕人员被送往 Belantik 移民拘留中心,以接受进一步调查及处理。有关部门将继续调查涉案人员是否涉及违反马来西亚移民法令。 此次行动再次体现马来西亚移民执法部门持续加强对外籍劳工及非法居留人员的检查力度。 📣关注大新闻频道 @HYY3333 ✅投稿爆料删帖 @zqq3333 👍代办激活护照 @zqq3333 ✅商务广告合作 @zqq3333
👍1
🇿🇼🇿🇲🇾🇪🇪🇭🇼🇫🇻🇳🇻🇪🇺🇿🇻🇮🇺🇾 🥚 8T娱乐城 · 全球数字网投领导者 🥚 实力老品牌 · 信誉保障 · 放心赢 🥚 NO钱包担保1000万U—实力雄厚 🚗 官网:8T.COM 【 铸就人生奇迹】 😀经过多年稳定运营、已成为玩家信赖的首选平台 😀东南亚线上第一盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😀官方游戏+极速出款、认准信誉实力老平台 😀选平台不必四处观望、选我们就是最稳的答案 😁😅😂😇🙃😉🥰😘😛🤪 ♠️ 首存最高赠送 18888U ♠️ 二存三存相赠 8888U ♠️ 大额提款加赠 18888U ♠️每月逢8必发尊享豪礼 ♠️ APP每日抢红包不停! ♠️亿U现金大回馈天天领豪礼 ♠️尊享会员等级+周俸禄+月俸禄 🍏🍎🍐🍊🍋🍋🟩🍌🍉🍇 🔠8T.COM|实力铸就信誉,品质赢取未来 🔠8T.COM|公正公平无私彩,华人首选娱乐 🔠8T.COM|一站式顶级体验,尊享非凡品牌 4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣ 8T.CO…
#网友投稿:此路不通!现在想从缅甸走小路回中国,真没那么容易了。 上个星期三,我们老大硬塞了一个人情单,要把一个从缅甸腊戌出发的人,通过边境小路送回中国。老大也是个明事理、懂时局的人,只交代我们尽力而为,能把人安全送过去最好。 经过三天在边境徘徊、观察和等待,到了星期六,我们自认为准备得差不多了,便安排两名缅甸边境原住民带人正式出发。 没想到,出发不到五个小时,整队人就失联了。起初我们并不意外,但超过十二个小时仍联系不上,基本判断这次走小路回中国失败了,很可能已经被抓。 说说现在中缅边境走小路的情况。以我七年的带队经验来看,从中国走小路进入缅甸,成功率不到25%;从缅甸走小路回中国,成功率更是不足15%。这些只是我个人的经验判断。 嘿嘿,情况就是这么个情况。不是夸,也不是吹,中国边防武警的人员素质和装备水平确实很强。我认为,他们能不能抓到偷渡人员,很多时候不是能力问题,而是想不想抓的问题。 干了七年这一行,我越来越觉…
😃😀😀😀芭提雅抓获一名中国籍通缉犯!涉嫌开设赌场,持国际刑警蓝色通报 11月10日,据泰国媒体报道,泰国移民警察接获中国方面提供的线索后,经过约12小时追踪调查,在春武里府芭提雅成功抓获一名37岁中国籍男子。该男子因涉嫌开设赌场,已被中国警方通缉,并被国际刑警组织发布蓝色通报。 此次抓捕行动由中国驻泰国大使馆提供线索,泰国移民局高层统一指挥,特别调查组负责实施。泰方接获信息后迅速展开调查,经过约12小时追踪,最终锁定该男子在芭提雅的藏匿地点,并于11月10日凌晨将其成功抓获。 行动中,警方现场核验其护照及身份信息,确认与中国方面提供的通缉资料一致。随后,泰国移民部门依据相关法律撤销其居留许可,并将其认定为不符合在泰居留条件的人员。 目前,该男子已被移送至泰国移民拘留中心,泰方正与中方协调后续遣返及相关法律程序,准备将其送回中国接受进一步调查和处理。 📣关注大新闻频道 @HYY3333 ✅投稿爆料删帖 @zqq3333 …
😀😃😀😀😀网络警察前日通报,两宗网络诈骗案共追回1,874,294泰铢,并将款项返还两名受害者。 警方在四色菊、北榄、巴吞他尼、乌汶及曼谷展开搜查,逮捕7名涉嫌转移诈骗资金人员。 首宗案件中,一名65岁退休女教师误信Facebook广告及LINE投资群,以“高回报任务”为由11次转账,损失近498万泰铢。警方冻结账户并追回约110万泰铢。 另案受害人遭诈骗者通过TikTok及LINE诱导参与“配图赚佣金”任务,22次转账损失逾110万泰铢。警方冻结涉案账户70万泰铢。案件仍在追查中。 📣关注大新闻频道 @HYY3333 ✅投稿爆料删帖 @zqq3333 👍代办激活护照 @zqq3333 ✅商务广告合作 @zqq3333
#马来西亚资讯:吉打突袭疑似人口贩运窝点!16名印尼妇女获救,两名男子被捕 11月11日报道,马来西亚吉打州移民局展开代号“平图行动”(Ops Pintu),于11月10日深夜突击搜查亚罗士打一处民宅,成功解救16名疑似人口贩运受害者,并逮捕两名男子协助调查。 此次行动于11月10日晚上11时30分展开,执法人员前往吉打州亚罗士打Taman Desa Baiduri、Jalan Gangsa一处民宅进行突击检查,现场发现16名年龄介于20岁至46岁的印尼籍妇女,怀疑该处涉及人口贩运活动。 行动期间,执法人员查获33本印尼护照及12万2598令吉现金,同时扣押两辆汽车,分别为丰田RAV4及丰田Avanza。 此外,两名年龄分别为31岁及59岁的男子当场被捕,以协助调查。 吉打州移民局表示,此次行动是依据2007年《反人口贩运及反偷渡移民法》(ATIPSOM,第670号法案)展开,案件目前援引该法令第12条文调查。 目前…
#群友投稿:东南亚这地方,心软的人不配活着。 在东南亚混迹多年,看透了这片鱼龙混杂的修罗场。这里最没用的东西,就是善良、心软、讲情义。在这里混,做人必须狠,必须绝情,必须冷血。 你不狠,根本没人把你当回事,压根站不住脚。你不狠,大钱小钱都轮不到你,只能看着别人吃肉。你不狠,就活该被人拿捏、被人欺负、被人随意压榨。你不狠,就是别人眼里的软柿子,任人宰割、活活被吞掉。你不狠,一辈子只能垫底,做最底层的炮灰。 这地方最讽刺的就是:善良换不来尊重,退让换不来安稳。你心软,别人就拿捏你的软肋;你留情,别人就得寸进尺榨干你;你讲仁义,别人只会觉得你愚蠢、好欺负。 在这里,根本没有什么江湖道义,只有弱肉强食。人人都盯着你的利益,盼着你落魄,等着被分食。所谓的善良,在这里就是致命弱点。心软的,被淘汰;绝情的,能立足;够狠的,能赚钱。 不是我变冷漠了,是这片土地教我的。想活下去、想挣钱、想站稳,就必须扔掉心软,戒掉仁慈。在东南亚,心不狠…
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🇻🇳🇻🇪🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇪 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🏆 多元游戏 · 一站畅玩 🏆 真人/电子/体育/棋牌/捕鱼/彩票 🏆 每日返水 · 福利不断 🏆 极速出款 · 高效服务 🏆 7×24小时在线客服 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆支持认证:点击可查 🌟😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🌟😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆: M8.com 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆: @m8baby04 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆: @m8vvip 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷: @M8COM04_bot
美国如何揭开柬埔寨洗钱网络的秘密? 洪森政府持续保持沉默,未能对跨国犯罪网络和网络诈骗网站展开初步调查,这反映了体制性问题以及政治权力与黑钱之间的利益纠葛。 迄今为止,尽管国际机构和外国政府不断提供线索和调查报告,例如联合国人权事务高级专员办事处(人权高专办)2023年8月发布的报告估计,至少有10万人在柬埔寨的诈骗网站上遭受人权侵犯和强迫劳动,但柬埔寨国家当局仍然无所作为。 造成这种软弱的主要原因是,像太子集团这样的大型犯罪网络通过在房地产、酒店、银行和物流等领域数十亿美元的投资,已经深入渗透到正规经济体系中,因此,这些网络的瓦解或瓦解将直接损害国内经济稳定和权贵阶层的收入来源。 此外,犯罪网络的高层领导人伪装成商业巨头或战略投资者,向国家基金、社会事业和基础设施捐赠数百万美元,以换取政治影响力和法律保护。然而,核实资金来源和真实所有权的机制仍然不足,使得主管当局难以甚至无法干预此类资金来源。 洪森政府经常以行政借口…
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,097 posts we hold for @HYY3333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @HYY3333 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 6 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 12 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@usdtgame8 · 1,56160 posts免费能量/查U群 @hu520
@hu520 · 2,34154 postsN9.COM|官方频道
@N9_com1 · 13,31853 postsN9.COM 福利频道导航
@n9pd888 · 7,15953 posts6G全球丨官方爆奖俱乐部
@ceo6g · 2,14550 posts🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,23724 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 36,22123 posts亚太导航频道
@dh555 · 4,51621 posts亚太国际-86.Net
@uu886bot · 10,61921 posts亚太国际→86.Net
@ytgj9999 · 27,98721 posts2G.COM-官方频道
@GF2Gcom · 33520 postsU99贵宾会-官方频道
@U99GBH · 2,39216 posts环球大事件 @tk555
@DnyRm1 · 7,78011 posts你好,彦祖、亦菲
@mgame9527 · 4311 postsUU国际丨赢钱俱乐部
@WWW6ACOM · 7,4599 postsM8.com-国际官方频道.
@m8baby04 · 1,5168 postsF1.TOP机器人
@f1ff · 12,8417 posts东南亚吃瓜聊天群🍉
@HYY1680 · 1,2193 posts8T娱乐城 官方-频道
@www8tcom · 28,0133 posts东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,4051 post东南亚黑暗事件
@DNY_hasj · 199,0341 post海外交友俱乐部
@haiwai_JLB · 5,6101 postViber自动回复|Viber批量运营|Viber协议账号
@wg888ii · 21 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@HYY3333 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 462,405#1
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,012#2
@MB_149 · 129,692#3
@jpz_888 · 12,142#4
@tx100 · 148,323#5
@dj17baoguang · 29,718#6
@jinbianyy · 26,518#7
@ygxw3 · 148,935#8
@dongnanyadaxiaoshi · 176#9
@toutiaoshijian · 66,698#10
@svip40 · 129,751#11
@pyzcn · 211,778#12
@bx777 · 29,969#13
@jpz39 · 13,533#14
@xigangz · 94,049#15
@dnyggg · 40,772#16
@DNYTJL3 · 84,052#17
@cq111 · 3,772#18
@DNY_hasj · 199,034#19
@usd1 · 253,081 (as read 16 August 2026)#20
@JXBGW · 157,849#21
@mianbeitongjiling · 28,456#22
@blj77 · 164,249#23
@SB919 · 120,228#24
@junzhang02 · 24,660#25
@bg888 · 310,066#26
@cn789 · 19,913#27
@jyjtgsh · 626#28
@xigang6 · 4,195#29
@ab100 · 126,776#30
@ac666 · 319,437#31
@bodutt · 66,197#32
@DNY0027 · 2,634#33
@chiguahs · 107,687#34
@TG_DJ777 · 127,739#35
@aa144 · 34,618#36
@flb00 · 16,379#37
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 72,375#38
@bgggg2o · 848#39
@sucai1 · 58,856#40
@dj17 · 70,782#41
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dj17baoguang · 29,718
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 19 September 2026
@JXBGW · 157,849
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 13 August 2026
@baoguang7 · 37,484
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 24 August 2026
@DNY_hasj · 199,034
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 11 August 2026
@blj11 · 28,533
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 26 August 2026
@tx100 · 148,323
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大新闻” (@HYY3333), 101,669 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HYY3333.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.