Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بانک تست حقوق

Channel

بانک تست حقوق

@Law_TesT2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

62,770subscribers

+1,107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450839072
TypeChannel
Username@Law_TesT2
Description┘ܟ̇ߺܥ‌ߊ‌‌ࡅ࡙ߺߊ‌‌ بدون ذکر جزئیات شکرت♥️🌱 ✓هر روز سوالات چهار گزینه اے⧠ ✓تست زنی به داوطلبان کمک می کند تا با انواع سوالات و نحوه طرح آنها آشنا شوند، سرعت و دقت خود را افزایش دهند و نقاط ضعف خود را شناسایی کنند ✓ 👨‍🎓ادمین تبلیغات: @Lawyer_d1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Law_TesT2

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

61,62062,77062,1956 August 2026 — 61,663 subscribers7 August 2026 — 61,652 subscribers8 August 2026 — 61,621 subscribers9 August 2026 — 61,620 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61,719 subscribers11 August 2026 — 61,713 subscribers12 August 2026 — 61,702 subscribers14 August 2026 — 61,706 subscribers15 August 2026 — 61,698 subscribers16 August 2026 — 61,694 subscribers17 August 2026 — 61,690 subscribers18 August 2026 — 61,682 subscribers19 August 2026 — 61,683 subscribers20 August 2026 — 61,742 subscribers22 August 2026 — 61,916 subscribers24 August 2026 — 61,888 subscribers26 August 2026 — 61,889 subscribers27 August 2026 — 61,870 subscribers28 August 2026 — 61,860 subscribers29 August 2026 — 62,049 subscribers30 August 2026 — 62,063 subscribers31 August 2026 — 62,059 subscribers1 September 2026 — 62,105 subscribers1 September 2026 — 62,141 subscribers3 September 2026 — 62,147 subscribers4 September 2026 — 62,148 subscribers7 September 2026 — 62,371 subscribers10 September 2026 — 62,499 subscribers12 September 2026 — 62,513 subscribers14 September 2026 — 62,525 subscribers16 September 2026 — 62,510 subscribers18 September 2026 — 62,500 subscribers30 September 2026 — 62,770 subscribers6 August 202630 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 55 days, net +1,107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,448–62,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 18:5562,770+270
18 Sept 2026, 04:4162,500-10
16 Sept 2026, 02:2262,510-15
14 Sept 2026, 09:1862,525+12
12 Sept 2026, 18:1862,513+14
10 Sept 2026, 15:1762,499+128
7 Sept 2026, 14:1562,371+223
4 Sept 2026, 14:3862,148+1
3 Sept 2026, 02:1962,147+6
1 Sept 2026, 22:3762,141+36
1 Sept 2026, 00:1762,105+46
31 Aug 2026, 02:4462,059-4
30 Aug 2026, 03:1962,063+14
29 Aug 2026, 06:5362,049+189
28 Aug 2026, 07:5861,860-10
27 Aug 2026, 07:1261,870-19
26 Aug 2026, 05:1361,889+1
24 Aug 2026, 00:1661,888-28
22 Aug 2026, 04:4761,916+174
20 Aug 2026, 22:3361,742first reading

Engagement

813 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.12%
avg views ÷ 62,770 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
353 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.391%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
353
of 813 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 344 of 353 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held813 (5 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total913,530
Reactions total3,509
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 02:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,940
Videos
≈182
Links
≈354

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,913 reactions across 796 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,79385.8%
👍1,12014.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 797 of the 813 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,913 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 813 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,190 views1 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

📣 #تنها_منابع_قبولی حتی #۱۵_روز با سند 👇🏻 #وکالت_اسکودا #۳۵روز #وکالت_قوه_قضاییه #۶۵روز #استفاده کن 👇 https://t.me/+5QXIn9691wFmM2Jk 📌#زمانی نداری که بخوای با #منابع_پرحجم #کلاسهای_طولانی همانند #نود_هزار_نفر سال قبل #مردود شی https://t.me/+5QXIn9691wFmM2Jk #هزاران #رتبه_تک_رقمی #۱۵_روز 👇 https://t.me/+5QXIn9691wFmM2Jk

❤1

1 Oct 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,380 views8 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه در خصوص قرار بایگانی پرونده صحیح نیست؟ (آدک - سوال ۹۵)

  1. در جرایم تعزیری درجه ۷ و ۸ قابل صدور است.12%
  2. غیرقابل اعتراض است.39%
  3. این قرار برای هر فردی فقط یک‌ بار قابل صدور است.30%
  4. فقدان سابقه محکومیت موثر کیفری شرط است.20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤8

1 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,370 views10 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

طبق موازین قانون اساسی مقام رهبری در تأیید صلاحیت داوطلبان ریاست جمهوری:

  1. فقط در دوره اول انقلاب این اختیار را داشت.22%
  2. در تمام دوره ها این اختیار را دارد.29%
  3. فقط هنگام برکناری رئیس جمهور این اختیار را دارد.15%
  4. این اختیار را ندارد و کاملاً با شورای نگهبان است34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤10

1 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,090 views11 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

مطابق قانون مدنی،ارجاع دعاوی مولی علیه به داوری توسط قیم ،……

  1. نیاز به تجویز دادستان دارد.62%
  2. نیاز به تجویز دادستان ندارد.38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤11

1 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC≈2,150 views9 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه در خصوص قرار ترک تعقیب صحیح نیست؟ (آدک - سوال ۹۴)

  1. قرار ترک تعقیب در صورتی صادر می‌شود که شاکی تا قبل از پایان جلسه اول رسیدگی، درخواست ترک تعقیب کند.42%
  2. قرار ترک تعقیب غیرقابل اعتراض است.19%
  3. پس از صدور قرار ترک تعقیب، شاکی می‌تواند تعقیب مجدد متهم را یکبار ظرف مهلت مقرر، درخواست کند.22%
  4. فقط در جرایم قابل گذشت قابل صدور است.18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤9

1 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,490 views12 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

غیرمسلمانی پس از شرب خمر در خانه‌اش، در حال مستی در خیابان ظاهر می‌شود. چه حکمی در خصوص او صادر می‌شود؟

  1. به مجازات مقرر برای تشویق به فساد محکوم می‌شود5%
  2. به حد مصرف مسکر محکوم می‌شود23%
  3. عمل او فاقد عنوان کیفری است21%
  4. به مجازات مقرر برای تظاهر به عمل حرام محکوم می‌شود51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤12

1 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC≈2,370 views9 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه در مورد احکام مسئولیت مدنی در حقوق ایران صحیح نیست؟

  1. خسارت ناشی از اتلاف منافع قابل مطالبه است12%
  2. مسئولیت ناشی از اتلاف مبتنی بر تقصیر است37%
  3. خسارت معنوی قابل مطالبه است17%
  4. مسئولیت غاصب مبتنی بر تقصیر نیست34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤9

1 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC≈2,470 views10 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

صدور دستور موقت از دیوان عدالت اداری...

  1. مجاز است و از درخواست کننده تامین گرفته نمی‌شود42%
  2. مجاز است و از درخواست کننده تامین گرفته می‌شود26%
  3. ممنوع است19%
  4. تنها در صورتی مجاز است که طرف مقابل وزارتخانه‌ باشد و تامین گرفته می‌شود13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤10

1 Oct 2026, 06:32 UTC≈2,360 views10 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

کدام مورد صحیح است؟

  1. ثبت اسم تجارتی اجباری است و اسم تجارتی قابل انتقال نیست15%
  2. ثبت اسم تجارتی اختیاری است مگر این‌که وزارت دادگستری آن را الزامی کند وپس از ثبت قابل انتقال میباشد34%
  3. ثبت اسم تجارتی اجباری می‌باشد و اسم تجارتی قابل انتقال است31%
  4. ثبت اسم تجارتی اختیاری است و اسم تجارتی قابل انتقال است19%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤10

1 Oct 2026, 05:45 UTC≈2,420 views8 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

شروع به رسیدگی با قرار جلب به دادرسی، در کدام دادگاه قابل تصور نیست؟

  1. کیفری دو، نسبت به جرم تعزیری درجه هفت36%
  2. کیفری یک در جرایم سیاسی و مطبوعاتی20%
  3. کیفری دو، در صورت نبود شاکی خصوصی25%
  4. کیفری یک، نسبت به جرایم سلب حیات و حبس درجه یک تا سه19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤8

1 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC≈2,440 views14 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

شخصی که بدون داشتن پروانه از موسسه بیمه، تحت عنوان نمایندگی بیمه برای هر یک از رشته‌ها قبول بیمه کند، به مجازات چه جرمی محکوم خواهد شد؟

  1. تقلب در امور بیمه10%
  2. جعل عنوان بیمه‌گر و تحصیل عواید نامشروع32%
  3. تحصیل مال از طریق نامشروع و پولشویی11%
  4. کلاهبرداری48%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤14

30 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,840 views14 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

در ضمن عقد بیع، مشتری متعهد شده که تا دو سال، مبیع را به کسی نفروشد. چنانچه مشتری از این تعهد تخلف کند و طی این دو سال، مبیع را به شخص ثالثی بفروشد، حکم قضیه چیست؟

  1. بایع اول حق فسخ بیع اول و استرداد عین مبیع را دارد27%
  2. بایع اول حق فسخ بیع دوم و استرداد عین مبیع را دارد14%
  3. بایع اول حق فسخ ندارد25%
  4. بایع اول حق فسخ بیع اول را دارد و حق استرداد عین مبیع را ندارد34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤14

Showing the 12 most recent of 813 posts we hold for @Law_TesT2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Law_TesT2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 September 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 643 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Oct 2026, 18:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz499 voters

کدام گزینه در خصوص قرار بایگانی پرونده صحیح نیست؟ (آدک - سوال ۹۵)

  1. در جرایم تعزیری درجه ۷ و ۸ قابل صدور است.12%
  2. غیرقابل اعتراض است.39%
  3. این قرار برای هر فردی فقط یک‌ بار قابل صدور است.30%
  4. فقدان سابقه محکومیت موثر کیفری شرط است.20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz495 voters

طبق موازین قانون اساسی مقام رهبری در تأیید صلاحیت داوطلبان ریاست جمهوری:

  1. فقط در دوره اول انقلاب این اختیار را داشت.22%
  2. در تمام دوره ها این اختیار را دارد.29%
  3. فقط هنگام برکناری رئیس جمهور این اختیار را دارد.15%
  4. این اختیار را ندارد و کاملاً با شورای نگهبان است34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz781 voters

مطابق قانون مدنی،ارجاع دعاوی مولی علیه به داوری توسط قیم ،……

  1. نیاز به تجویز دادستان دارد.62%
  2. نیاز به تجویز دادستان ندارد.38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz729 voters

کدام گزینه در خصوص قرار ترک تعقیب صحیح نیست؟ (آدک - سوال ۹۴)

  1. قرار ترک تعقیب در صورتی صادر می‌شود که شاکی تا قبل از پایان جلسه اول رسیدگی، درخواست ترک تعقیب کند.42%
  2. قرار ترک تعقیب غیرقابل اعتراض است.19%
  3. پس از صدور قرار ترک تعقیب، شاکی می‌تواند تعقیب مجدد متهم را یکبار ظرف مهلت مقرر، درخواست کند.22%
  4. فقط در جرایم قابل گذشت قابل صدور است.18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz948 voters

غیرمسلمانی پس از شرب خمر در خانه‌اش، در حال مستی در خیابان ظاهر می‌شود. چه حکمی در خصوص او صادر می‌شود؟

  1. به مجازات مقرر برای تشویق به فساد محکوم می‌شود5%
  2. به حد مصرف مسکر محکوم می‌شود23%
  3. عمل او فاقد عنوان کیفری است21%
  4. به مجازات مقرر برای تظاهر به عمل حرام محکوم می‌شود51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz840 voters

کدام گزینه در مورد احکام مسئولیت مدنی در حقوق ایران صحیح نیست؟

  1. خسارت ناشی از اتلاف منافع قابل مطالبه است12%
  2. مسئولیت ناشی از اتلاف مبتنی بر تقصیر است37%
  3. خسارت معنوی قابل مطالبه است17%
  4. مسئولیت غاصب مبتنی بر تقصیر نیست34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 813 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,729
#1
تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️
@voic_law · 29,427
#2
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,555
#3
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,219
#4
کانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,421
#5
چتردانش اهواز
@chatreahvaz · 17,730
#6
نکته و تست حقوقی
@LAWw_test · 23,849
#7
آزمون برتر|وکالت،قضاوت
@Azmone_bartar · 21,071
#8
آرای قضایی
@arayeghazayii · 28,737
#9
فریبرز حدادی مشاوره آزمون وکالت
@fariborzhadadi_68 · 3,751
#10
آمادگی آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۵
@AMADEGIVEKALATE1404 · 4,675
#11
نکات ناب آزمون وکالت
@nokatnabvekalat · 43,108
#12
📚کتب حقوقی وpdf ⚖️
@Legal_book · 17,601
#13
مدرسه آنلاین حقوق | Lawcenter
@lawcenter_ir · 5,805
#14
جزوه سرا (حقوق)
@buasr · 17,961
#15
بانک تست آیین دادرسی کیفری
@ayindadrasikayfarii · 8,958
#16
چتر عدالت NEW
@chatr_edalatt · 8,525
#17
صوت و تست حقوق
@law_ghazavat · 38,373
#18
🇮🇷اخبار حقوقی ایران 🇮🇷
@mosahebevekalat · 10,200
#19
حقوقدانان ایران
@hoghoghdanan_iran · 10,494
#20
تدریس ‌تخصصی‌ فقه ‌و‌‌ اصول ‌البچاری
@osoul_motoun · 4,988
#21
⚖کانال حقوقی عدل میزان⚖
@Aldmizan · 7,961
#22
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 46,870
#23
دیوان حقوق
@divanhoghogh · 11,846
#24
چکیده ی آرای وحدت رویه
@arayevahdat · 11,838
#25
کانال منصب قضاوت
@ghezavat110 · 4,142
#26
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 39,660
#27
موسسه آموزش عالی آزادچتردانش
@chatredanesh · 13,753
#28
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 153,331
#29
آکادمی جزا وکیفری سهامی
@jazakefari · 18,696
#30
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,500
#31
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 116,400
#32
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 81,374
#33
بانک جامع نکته و تست حقوق ((( تمام قوانین )))
@banktestjamemahdijomepour · 9,316
#34
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 42,216
#35
بانک تست آیین دادرسی مدنی
@banktestayindadrasimadani · 11,450
#36
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,706
#37
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,253
#38
آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری
@drseyedjafari · 56,367
#39
حقوق به زبان ساده ⁦🇮🇷⁩laweasy@
@laweasy · 11,085
#40
آزمون وکالت، قضاوت، سردفتری
@lawtadris · 16,583
#41
⚖️「بوک حقوق | 𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊_𝐇𝐎𝐆𝐇𝐎𝐆𝐇」 ⚖
@Book_Hoghogh · 18,339
#42
فایل و کتاب های حقوقی (حقوق بوک) 🇮🇷
@hoghooghboook · 45,299
#43
فایل و ویس حقوقی حقوق بان
@hoghoghBann · 11,190
#44
آکادمی وکیل سحر کرباسی
@academy_karbasi · 8,448
#45
✨ترمینولوژی حقوق✨
@terminolojii79 · 9,380
#46
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,579
#47
تست آ.د.کیفری آنلاین
@a_dadrasi_keyfari99 · 8,764
#48
کانال حقوق
@hoghoogh · 26,218
#49
کارآموزی وکالت (کارآموز یار)
@karamooz_vekalat · 23,683
#50
رادیو حقوق📻🖤
@Radio_Law · 994
#51
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,608
#52
نکته و تست قوانین خاص
@ghavaninekhas · 14,404
#53
کتابخانه حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,393
#54
تدریس آیین دادرسی کیفری-سهامی
@kefaritadris · 3,174
#55
حقوق پرس
@Lawpress · 8,144
#56
بانک تست حقوق جزا
@banktesthoghoghjaza · 9,788
#57
حقوق مدنی ⚖
@Civillaw_Iran · 3,106
#58
hoghough_khososi
@hoghough_khososi · 81
#59
آموزش آزمون های حقوقی( نکته وتست) موسسه عادلان
@hoghoghvekalatt · 17,237
#60
متون فقه
@motonefeghvekalat1401 · 12,442
#61
حقوق مدنی⚖
@LAAW98 · 24,437
#62
کانون حقوق ایران🇮🇷
@kanon_hoghogh_iran · 9,311
#63
چنل حقوقی ( ساحل علم)
@lawsahel · 8,324
#64
تدریس وتست کامل حقوق کیفری محمدرضا
@hoghoghkifari · 5,670
#65
متون فقه - اصول فقه آزمون وکالت
@motoon_osool · 10,642
#66
فایل و تست حقوقی
@LEGALFAQ · 5,356
#67
دکتر ندا سیدجعفری
@drnedaseyedjafari · 5,687
#68
jazaghafoori
@jazaghafoorii · 7,370
#69
انجمن علمی حقوق دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران
@kharazmi_law · 5,689
#70
فایل حقوقی رابین هود
@voicelaw5040 · 13,239
#71
حقوق پلاس⚖️
@testtalifi · 1,833
#72
کانال حقوقی آیدین لطف اله زادگان
@hoghoogh_khososi · 1,949
#73
تست (حقوق مدنی)
@mahditazikiiiiiiiiii · 10,133
#74
فایل های حقوقی برای وکلا و کارآموزان
@law_radin · 4,437
#75
تدریس های حقوقی جدید (حقوق بوک)
@HoghooghBook · 13,675
#76
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 21,866
#77
آموزش حقوق/ الهام دلفانی
@delfanilaw · 11,477
#78
🎵آوایِ حقوق🎵
@LAWSONG · 21,077
#79
انجمن‌حقوق‌شناسی
@iranianlls · 11,023
#80
مسیر طلایی وکالت
@masirtalayivekalat · 8,922
#81
🌸کانال صوت تدریس متون فقه وکالت و تست🌸
@motoonghh · 1,183
#82
حقوق و هنر
@lawandart99 · 2,796
#83
موسسه دیوان حق
@divanehagh · 3,987
#84
شهرداد
@dadshahr96 · 19,545
#85
کتابهای حقوقی و سیاسی℡
@Book_L_P · 9,325
#86
جزوه و صوت حقوقی
@hoghooghi · 18,452
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️
@voic_law · 29,427
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,555
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
نکته و تست حقوقی
@LAWw_test · 23,849
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
کانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,421
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
مهران حسنلو - مشاوره آزمون وکالت
@Mehran_hasanloo · 54,568
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 September 2026
نکات ناب آزمون وکالت
@nokatnabvekalat · 43,108
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
صوت و تست حقوق
@law_ghazavat · 38,373
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
آرای قضایی
@arayeghazayii · 28,737
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,729
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 46,870
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,219
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
آزمون برتر|وکالت،قضاوت
@Azmone_bartar · 21,071
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
کانال تست رابین هود
@testerobinhood · 83,925
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال حقوق
@hoghoogh · 26,218
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
احمد غفوری کانال اصلی
@ghafooriasli · 57,914
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 39,660
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
🎵آوایِ حقوق🎵
@LAWSONG · 21,077
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
حقوق مدنی⚖
@LAAW98 · 24,437
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
کتابخانه حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,393
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 21,866
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,579
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,706
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
قوانین خلقت
@rules_of_creation · 27,060
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 81,374
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بانک تست حقوق” (@Law_TesT2), 62,770 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Law_TesT2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.