Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری

Channel

آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری

@drseyedjafari

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

56,367subscribers

+1,585 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001118538814
TypeChannel
Username@drseyedjafari
Descriptionمدرس تخصصی آیین دادرسی مدنی وکیل پایه یک دادگستری رتبه ۴ اختبار کانون مرکز فارغ التحصیل دانشگاه شهید بهشتی و دانشگاه تهران 📌پیج اینستاگرام: instagram.com/drseyedjafari 🌏لینک کانال قوانین خلقت: https://t.me/rules_of_creation @mashahiredanesh
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drseyedjafari

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

54,70556,36755,5367 August 2026 — 54,782 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,782 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,781 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,798 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,809 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,827 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,834 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54,840 subscribers15 August 2026 — 54,864 subscribers16 August 2026 — 54,865 subscribers17 August 2026 — 54,860 subscribers18 August 2026 — 54,856 subscribers19 August 2026 — 54,839 subscribers21 August 2026 — 54,822 subscribers22 August 2026 — 54,808 subscribers24 August 2026 — 54,799 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,771 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,737 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,727 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,720 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,722 subscribers2 September 2026 — 54,723 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,705 subscribers5 September 2026 — 54,711 subscribers8 September 2026 — 54,746 subscribers11 September 2026 — 54,784 subscribers13 September 2026 — 54,755 subscribers15 September 2026 — 54,767 subscribers16 September 2026 — 54,764 subscribers19 September 2026 — 54,840 subscribers25 September 2026 — 56,367 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net +1,585. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,456–56,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 21:5556,367+1,527
19 Sept 2026, 08:5654,840+76
16 Sept 2026, 23:5754,764-3
15 Sept 2026, 04:1954,767+12
13 Sept 2026, 11:1654,755-29
11 Sept 2026, 14:1754,784+38
8 Sept 2026, 21:0154,746+35
5 Sept 2026, 14:2054,711+6
3 Sept 2026, 14:0154,705-18
2 Sept 2026, 09:4354,723+1
1 Sept 2026, 12:2554,722+7
31 Aug 2026, 11:5754,715-5
29 Aug 2026, 08:2654,720-7
28 Aug 2026, 08:4454,727-10
27 Aug 2026, 08:1754,737-14
26 Aug 2026, 05:0654,751-20
25 Aug 2026, 05:5854,771-28
24 Aug 2026, 06:4654,799-9
22 Aug 2026, 11:3454,808-14
21 Aug 2026, 00:3454,822first reading

Engagement

159 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 56,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,300
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.999%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 159 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held159 (27 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total688,920
Reactions total6,885
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 05:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,260
Videos
≈178
Links
≈612

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 21s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,345 reactions across 159 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,60061.6%
😐9227.47%
👍6895.58%
😁6014.87%
😍4113.33%
🤡3763.05%
👏3452.79%
🥰2241.81%
🌭1871.51%
🗿1040.842%
🙏850.689%
🤪840.68%
😭750.608%
🔥700.567%
🥴690.559%
❤‍🔥540.437%
💘500.405%
💯480.389%
🤨460.373%
🤔380.308%
31 further kinds2672.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 159 of the 159 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 159 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drseyedjafari. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 159 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 07:56 UTC≈4,700 views95 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

جاتون خالی رتبه های برتر ارشد در موسسه مشاهیر

❤81🔥5🤡5👍2🤔2

30 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTC≈6,800 views139 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Voice message

پاسخ تحلیلی تست بالا👆 سطح تست: دشوار بیش از شصت درصد از داوطلبان، پاسخ اشتباه دادند❗️

❤98😁14👍9🙏7😎6🥰5

29 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC≈7,930 views12 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

به ایدی زیر پیام بدید 👇 https://t.me/admiiiiiiiiiiinnnn

❤12

29 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTC≈5,060 views46 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Forwarded from @mashahiredaneshFile

🔶صوت مرور سریع آیین دادرسی مدنی 🔸مبحث سوم: اختلاف در صلاحیت 🧑🏻‍🏫با تدریس: دکتر سیدجعفری 🎁هدیه به اعضای برنامه ریزی ۴۰ روزه قبولی در آزمون وکالت 📌برای دریافت رایگان باقی منابع معرفی شده در برنامه ریزی چهل روزه در لینک زیر ثبت نام نمایید!👇🏻 https://mashahiredanesh.com/Product/686/برنامه-ریزی-40-روزه-قبولی-در-آزمون-وکالت @mashahiredanesh

❤39🙏4🥰3

29 Sept 2026, 07:12 UTC≈7,210 views61 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣44%
  2. 2️⃣42%
  3. 3️⃣6%
  4. 4️⃣10%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤48😐9🔥4

29 Sept 2026, 07:12 UTC≈6,900 views70 reactionsread 2 October 2026

خواهان در یک دادخواست، همزمان دو خواسته 'تخلیه ید' و 'مطالبۀ اجور معوقه' را مطرح کرده است. اگر یکی از این دو خواسته با نقص در بهای خواسته مواجه باشد، تکلیف مدیر دفتر چیست؟ الف) فقط نسبت به خواسته ناقص اخطار می‌دهد و خواسته دیگر را به جریان می‌اندازد. ب)کل دادخواست را با صدور یک اخطار رفع نقص متوقف می‌کند. ج)قرار رد فوری صادر می‌کند زیرا تعدد خواسته در یک دادخواست ممنوع است. د)بدون توجه به نقص، پرونده را به شعبه م…

❤64👏3💯3

29 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC≈7,570 views99 reactions2 Starsread 2 October 2026

سلام حقیقت ماجرا اینه که چیز مطلوبی برای ارائه دادن ندارم فقط دلم می‌خواست خیلی دلی بگم که.... خیلی خوبه وقتی آدم حس می‌کنه به یه جایی تعلق داره. نمی‌دونم می‌تونم درست بیانش کنم یا نه، ولی به شخصه بعد از مدت‌ها حس می‌کنم عضوی از یه جامعه بزرگ و صمیمی‌ام جایی که منو فقط به خاطر اینکه هزینه کردم نخواستن، بلکه فارغ از اینکه چقدر می‌تونم برای این خانواده مفید باشم منو به عنوان یه عضو پذیرفتن و برای بودنم ارزش قائل شدن و…

❤77😁5👍4👏4🥰4😐3🌚2

28 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC≈8,260 views122 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Voice message

پاسخ تحلیلی تست بالا👆 سطح تست: متوسط حدود شصت درصد پاسخ صحیح دادند🎉

❤97😎12👍8🔥2🥰2☃1

27 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈10,500 views113 reactionsread 2 October 2026

من اکثر کتابهای آئین دادرسی از اساتیدی که خیلی اسمشون بولد شده بود رو گرفتم ولی بی اغراق میگم اگر میخواید آئین دادرسی رو خوب درک کنید،کتاب جامع آئین دادرسی جناب دکتر سید جعفری رو بگیرید.مسیرتون هموار🌻

❤76👍15🤡12😐4💘3☃2🥰1

27 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC≈10,300 views47 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣9%
  2. 2️⃣62%
  3. 3️⃣18%
  4. 4️⃣13%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤27👍13👏3☃2🥰2

27 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC≈9,240 views60 reactionsread 2 October 2026

شخصی به عنوان 'ثالث' نسبت به حکمی که بین دو نفر دیگر صادر شده و به حقوق او خلل وارد می‌کند، اعتراض دارد. اگر او بخواهد این اعتراض را در جریان دادرسیِ دعوای دیگری که بین یکی از همان طرفین و خودش در حال رسیدگی است مطرح کند، این اعتراض چه نام دارد و تشریفات آن چیست؟ الف) اعادۀ دادرسی طاری نام دارد و صرفاً با یک لایحه در همان جلسه قابل رسیدگی است. ب)اعتراض ثالث طاری نام دارد و اگر دادگاهِ در حال رسیدگی از دادگاه صادرکن…

❤52🔥4☃3💘1

27 Sept 2026, 04:12 UTC≈10,800 views51 reactionsread 2 October 2026

از من به شما پیشنهاد به جز کانال های مشاهیر و کانال قوانین خلقت استاد سیدجعفری همه رو پاک کنید به قرآن یه سری کانالا انقددد اطلاعات چرت گذاشتن که آدم تاسف میخوره و غصه میخوره ب جون داوطلب

❤37👍4🤡4🙏3👏2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 159 posts we hold for @drseyedjafari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@drseyedjafari edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Sept 2026, 07:12 UTCAnonymous Poll2,710 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣44%
  2. 2️⃣42%
  3. 3️⃣6%
  4. 4️⃣10%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTCAnonymous Poll2,680 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣9%
  2. 2️⃣62%
  3. 3️⃣18%
  4. 4️⃣13%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Sept 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Poll3,480 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣13%
  2. 2️⃣5%
  3. 3️⃣81%
  4. 4️⃣3%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTCAnonymous Poll3,360 voters approx.

اصولا مهلت اظهار انکار و تردید…

  1. 1️⃣ تا اولین جلسه مرحله واخواهی است حتی اگر واخواهی خارج از مهلت باشد38%
  2. 2️⃣ تا اولین جلسه مرحله تجدیدنظرخواهی است17%
  3. 3️⃣ تا تا اولین جلسه مرحله واخواهی است فقط در صورتی که واخواهی در مهلت باشد18%
  4. 4️⃣ همه موارد30%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTCAnonymous Poll3,700 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣13%
  2. 2️⃣29%
  3. 3️⃣3%
  4. 4️⃣56%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTCAnonymous Poll4,460 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣17%
  2. 2️⃣48%
  3. 3️⃣13%
  4. 4️⃣23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 81,374
#1
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,500
#2
قوانین خلقت
@rules_of_creation · 27,060
#3
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,729
#4
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 153,331
#5
باشگاه وکلای مشاهیر
@mashahirlawyers · 31,193
#6
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,706
#7
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 116,400
#8
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,219
#9
متون فقه - اصول فقه آزمون وکالت
@motoon_osool · 10,642
#10
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,608
#11
دکتر ندا سیدجعفری
@drnedaseyedjafari · 5,687
#12
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 39,660
#13
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,253
#14
نکته و تست قوانین خاص
@ghavaninekhas · 14,404
#15
🇮🇷اخبار حقوقی ایران 🇮🇷
@mosahebevekalat · 10,200
#16
چکیده ی آرای وحدت رویه
@arayevahdat · 11,838
#17
آکادمی جزا وکیفری سهامی
@jazakefari · 18,696
#18
فایل حقوقی زاگرس
@zagroslaww · 28,483
#19
تدریس ‌تخصصی‌ فقه ‌و‌‌ اصول ‌البچاری
@osoul_motoun · 4,988
#20
آکادمی وکیل سحر کرباسی
@academy_karbasi · 8,448
#21
کانال حقوقی امیرعلی آذری
@amiraliazarichanel · 3,754
#22
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,826
#23
🌎همایش ها و رویدادهای حقوقی و صنفی(در پیوند با وکلای دادگستری)
@LAWCONFERENCES · 10,424
#24
آموزش حقوق/ الهام دلفانی
@delfanilaw · 11,477
#25
موسسه آموزش عالی آزادچتردانش
@chatredanesh · 13,753
#26
Droit channel
@droit_ir · 3,460
#27
مدرسه آنلاین حقوق | Lawcenter
@lawcenter_ir · 5,805
#28
چتردانش اهواز
@chatreahvaz · 17,730
#29
بنیاد حقوقی دادگو
@dadgoo_law · 315
#30
خبر رسان دادآفرین
@dadafarin_news · 14,657
#31
تست اساسی
@asasitest · 9,927
#32
محمد فرامرزی | مولف کتب آزمون وکالت ومصاحبه مرکزوکلا
@mohammad_faramarzi · 15,958
#33
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 21,866
#34
فایل حقوقی رابین هود
@voicelaw5040 · 13,239
#35
اصول‌ فقه تحلیلی (استاد بنی صدر)
@osool583 · 6,362
#36
موسسه مطالعات حقوقی دکتر محمدحسین شهبازی
@dr_shahbazi · 4,987
#37
آسان حقوق/دکتر کریمی منفرد
@asanhoghoghh · 7,258
#38
حقوق مدنی دادرس
@lawdadras · 15,939
#39
دپارتمان حقوق کاربردی چتردانش
@chatredanesh_vakil · 2,726
#40
مشاهیردانش تبریز
@mashahir_danesh_tabriz · 1,224
#41
رحا (رسانه حقوقی ایران)
@rahahoquqi · 8,716
#42
کانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,421
#43
مرکزوکلای قوه قضائیه استان اصفهان
@markazvokalaisfahan · 2,613
#44
آیین دادرسی مدنی | استاد شرقی
@ayin_dadrasi_madani · 13,712
#45
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,579
#46
پایگاه خبری پیشنیاز
@vokalaye_markazevokala · 4,322
#47
گروه حقوق موسسه آسیا
@Asia_hoghogh1 · 13,804
#48
انجمن علمی دانشجویی دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری
@anjomanelmi_ujsas · 5,913
#49
گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 22,041
#50
⚖️ آوای قانون ⚖️
@hogogkhan_vekalat · 9,491
#51
🏆چتردانش ارومیه🏆
@chatre_uromie · 945
#52
آکادمی حقوق | دکتر علی فلاح
@dralifallah_lawacademy · 6,711
#53
FazeliAcademy
@Fazeliacademy · 13,477
#54
پایگاه خبری مجد
@majdlaw · 1,770
#55
متون فقهی وکالت و ارشد
@motonefeghi · 9,838
#56
💥 كانال جزاروز💥
@jazarooz_bakhshizadeh · 10,888
#57
حقوق شهرسازی
@kamyar_reza · 3,583
#58
شوق وکالت_مشاور آزمون وکالت
@shoghe_vekalaat · 7,365
#59
برنامه‌ریزی آزمون وکالت
@barnameriziyevekalt · 2,110
#60
سوالات مصاحبه مرکز وکلا و قضاوت
@ghezavatee · 2,866
#61
تدریس آیین دادرسی کیفری-سهامی
@kefaritadris · 3,174
#62
مرکز وکلای قوه قضائیه خراسان رضوی
@razavi_m_v · 4,325
#63
کانال‌رسمی‌وحیدقاسمی‌بیلواری
@ghanonkhani_vokala · 7,766
#64
کارآموزی وکالت (کارآموز یار)
@karamooz_vekalat · 23,683
#65
⚖️دادگاه مجازی⚖️
@Dadgahmajazi · 13,064
#66
انجمن‌حقوق‌شناسی
@iranianlls · 11,023
#67
فریبرز حدادی مشاوره آزمون وکالت
@fariborzhadadi_68 · 3,751
#68
Familegal
@Familegal · 2,401
#69
NEDAYE EDALAT⚖🗽
@NedayeEdalat2 · 3,462
#70
کانال تخصصی دکتری حقوق
@PHDDOkTORI · 5,479
#71
کانال حقوقی استاد رزاززاده_ قاضی دادگستری
@razazzade_judge · 19,597
#72
مدنی دان
@madanidan · 8,549
#73
کارآموزی وکالت رابین‌ هود
@dadgahmajzi · 83,519
#74
کتابخانه حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,393
#75
بانک تست آیین دادرسی کیفری
@ayindadrasikayfarii · 8,958
#76
⚖تدریس مدنی ⚖
@fahimi1375 · 10,086
#77
انجمن علمی حقوق
@IranLawAssociation · 13,013
#78
چتر عدالت NEW
@chatr_edalatt · 8,525
#79
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 62,770
#80
hoghough_khososi
@hoghough_khososi · 81
#81
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,353
#82
کانال رسمی اسكودا
@skoodaa · 12,651
#83
آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام
@drjavaherkalam · 8,146
#84
کانال فایل های آموزشی کارآموزان آزمون ۱۴۰۰
@kkkvdm1402 · 3,133
#85
قانون تایم | هوش مصنوعی حقوقی و قوانین صوتی
@vakil0098 · 2,842
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قوانین خلقت
@rules_of_creation · 27,060
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,500
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 81,374
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
باشگاه وکلای مشاهیر
@mashahirlawyers · 31,193
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 39,660
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال تست رابین هود
@testerobinhood · 83,925
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 21,866
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,706
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 116,400
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
کارآموزی وکالت رابین‌ هود
@dadgahmajzi · 83,519
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,253
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
فایل حقوقی زاگرس
@zagroslaww · 28,483
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 153,331
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,579
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,729
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
کانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,421
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
کتابخانه حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,393
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,608
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,219
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,826
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
تدریس رایگان متون فقه وکالت- احمد غفوری
@mfvghafoori · 20,520
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 September 2026
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 62,770
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 22,041
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 46,870
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری” (@drseyedjafari), 56,367 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drseyedjafari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.