✅سامانه ساغر (ساماندهی اسناد غیر رسمی) در یک نگاه لینک عضویت در كانال تلگرام🔻 https://t.me/Zanjan_law
👍5❤4🙏4👌1💯1

Channel
@Lawpress_Arayeghazayi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,523subscribers
+630 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001122774004 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lawpress_Arayeghazayi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lawpress_Arayeghazayi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 21,523 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 21,522 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 21,521 | +179 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 21,342 | +15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 21,327 | +91 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 21,236 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 21,239 | +266 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 20,973 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 20,970 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 20,969 | +23 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 20,946 | +32 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 20,914 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 20,913 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 20,909 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 20,904 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 20,902 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 20,907 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 20,904 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 20,907 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 20,910 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 25 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (25 September 2025 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,460 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
494 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 235 | 47.6% | |
| ❤ | 178 | 36.0% | |
| 🙏 | 41 | 8.30% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 4.45% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 3.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2025 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅سامانه ساغر (ساماندهی اسناد غیر رسمی) در یک نگاه لینک عضویت در كانال تلگرام🔻 https://t.me/Zanjan_law
👍5❤4🙏4👌1💯1
✅در صورتی که پس از صدور حکم قطعی به استناد قسامه، برخی از اداکنندگان سوگند، در دادگاه صادر کننده حکم یا خارج از دادگاه از سوگند خود عدول نمایند به نحوی که تعداد ادا کنندگان سوگند کمتر از حد نصاب مقرر برای اثبات جنایت شود، محکومعلیه به استناد عدول آنان میتواند نسبت به حکم صادره در دیوان عالی کشور درخواست اعاده دادرسی نماید. پذیرش این درخواست منوط به اثبات عدول ادا کنندگان سوگند در دادگاه صادرکننده حکم نیست، اما در م…
👍7❤4👌1💯1🙏1
🔴 پروندههای مالیاتی دیگر فقط کار حسابدارها نیست. امروز بازار به متخصصی نیاز دارد که فقط قانون را نداند؛ ⚖️ بتواند پرونده را تحلیل کند، لایحه حرفهای بنویسد و از حقوق مؤدی دفاع کند. 🎓 دوره وکیل حرفهای مالیاتی + مدرک وزارت علوم در این دوره بهصورت کاربردی با این موضوعات کار میکنید: 🔻 مالیاتهای مستقیم و ارزش افزوده 🔻 سامانه مؤدیان 🔻 قانون کار و بیمه 🔻 دادرسی و لایحهنویسی مالیاتی 🔻 دفاع مالیاتی و بررسی پروندههای…
👍2❤1
با تمرکز روی ۳ درس کلیدی، مسیر قبولی دکتری دانشگاههای برتر دولتیو هموار کنید! 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 t.me/mashahiredanesh/5982 ظرفیت محدود ❌
✅جامع ترین منبع آزمون دکتری حقوق 🔸تدریس صفر تا صد دروس آزمون دکتری 🔸به صورت آنلاین 🔸ویژه داوطلبان گرایش های خصوصی، جزا و بین الملل با هر سطحی 📌اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبت نام👇🏻 https://t.me/mashahiredanesh/5982
⚖️ آینده حقوق، بدون هوش مصنوعی نیست! هنوز برای بررسی یک پرونده باید ساعتها بین اسناد، قراردادها، لوایح و آرای قضایی جستوجو کنی؟ 😵💫📚 وقتشه هوش مصنوعی رو به دستیار حرفهای حقوقی خودت تبدیل کنی! 🚀 🔥 در دوره «تحلیل اسناد و پروندههای حقوقی با هوش مصنوعی» یاد میگیری چطور با AI: 📌 پروندههای حجیم رو سریع تحلیل کنی 🔍 تناقضها و نکات پنهان اسناد رو پیدا کنی 📝 قرارداد، رأی و لایحه رو خلاصه و بررسی کنی ⚖️ محورهای دفاعی و …
❤2👍2
✅صلاحیّت دادگاه انقلاب به مواردی که اشخاص مرتکب نگهداری کالای قاچاق از جمله مشروبات الکلی خارجی به صورت جزئی میشوند تسرّی ندارد، در نتیجه رسیدگی به بزه نگهداری مشروبات الکلی خارجی با توصیف فوق، در صلاحیّت دادگاه کیفری دو میباشد. @Lawpress_Arayeghazayi 🔹️رأی وحدت رویه شماره ۸۳۹ ـ ۱۴۰۲/۰۹/۱۴ هیأت عمومی دیوان عالی کشور نظر به اصل یکصد و پنجاه و نهم قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، تشکیل و تعیین صلاحیّت دادگاهه…
❤10👍9🙏3👌2💯1
🔵در صورتیکه در خصوص نفقه زوجه حکم قطعی صادر و مبلغ مقطوعی تعیین و از ناحیه زوج پرداخت شود؛ آیا زوجه میتواند هزینههای درمانی حادث بابت عمل جراحی، هزینه دندانپزشکی و مانند آن را به صورت مستقل مطالبه کند؟ @Lawpress_Arayeghazayi 🟣پاسخ: در دعوای مطالبه نفقه زوجه، دادگاه با ارجاع موضوع به کارشناس و با لحاظ نیازهای متعارف و متناسب با وضعیت زن، میزان نفقه زوجه و ترتیب پرداخت آن را تعیین و اعلام میکند؛ علیالاصول صرف تو…
👍12❤6💯2🙏2👌1
✅چنانچه شخصی با دسترسی غیر مجاز به کیف الکترونیک اشخاص، اقدام به تحصیل ارزهای الکترونیک نماید، آیا این اقدام (با فرض وجود سایر شرایط قانونی) مشمول عنوان کلاهبرداری مرتبط با رایانه میگردد؟ (به عبارت دیگر آیا ارزهای الکترونیک وجه، مال یا منفعت یا خدمات یا امتیازات مالی تلقی میگردد؟) در صورت مثبت بودن پاسخ، با توجه به تکلیف دادگاه به صدور حکم به رد مال، آیا دادگاه بایستی حکم به استرداد ارزهای الکترونیک تحصیلی از مال ب…
❤20👍10🙏5👌3💯1
🔳قبل از حضور متهم، اعلام وکالت وکیل و پذیرش لایحه دفاعیه وی ممنوع نیست و وکیل متهم اجازه مطالعه پرونده را دارد(نظریه مشورتی شماره۷/۱۴۰۱/۱۱۶۵ مورخ ۱۴۰۱/۱۱/۲ اداره کل حقوقی قوه قضاییه) #نظریه_مشورتی #وکیل_دادگستری #اعلام_وکالت #مطالعه_پرونده #لایحه_دفاعیه ✅لينک عضويت در كانال تلگرام🔻 https://t.me/Lawpress_Arayeghazayi
❤8👍6💯3👌1🙏1
✅صورتجلسه نشست قضایی با موضوع بررسی ارتکاب بزه رابطه نامشروع از طریق پیامک #نشست_قضایی #رابطه_نامشروع #پیامک ✅لينک عضويت در كانال تلگرام⬇️ https://t.me/Lawpress_Arayeghazayi
👍10❤5👌1🙏1
✅ (میزان و نحوه محاسبه شرط تنصیف دارایی) @Lawpress_Arayeghazayi 🗓 تاریخ رای نهایی:1394/05/05 🔹شماره رای نهایی:9409970909900104 ⚫️ رای شعبه 26 دیوان عالی کشور: ...مستفاد از بند الف از شرایط ضمن عقد نکاح خارج لازم (هر گاه طلاق به درخواست زوجه نباشد و طبق تشخیص دادگاه تقاضای طلاق ناشی از تخلف زن از وظایف همسری یا سوء رفتار وی نبوده، زوج موظف است تا #نصف دارایی موجود خود را که در ایّام زناشویی با او به دست آورده ی…
👍19❤12👌4🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Lawpress_Arayeghazayi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بانک آرای قضایی” (@Lawpress_Arayeghazayi), 21,523 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lawpress_Arayeghazayi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.