Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️

Channel

تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️

@voic_law

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,655subscribers

+393 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055663615
TypeChannel
Username@voic_law
Description🌟﷽🌟 💿لیست بهترین صوت هاے ڪانال https://t.me/voic_law/9814۶ 📚((رسالت ما فقط کمک ب آموزش عادلانه حقوقیهاست اینجازادگاه رویش جوانه هاست)) ↓تبادل|تبلیغات↓ @mahur777 اینستاگرام: Instagram.com/lawOnline.news کانال سروش: https://splus.ir/Law_TesT
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/voic_law

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@voic_law/46117 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC@hoghoghvekalatt/1119008 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC1.005 days
@voic_law/46164 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC@hoghoghvekalatt/11254720 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC1.0011 days
@voic_law/46180 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC@hoghoghvekalatt/11255820 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC1.009 days
@voic_law/46183 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC@hoghoghvekalatt/11256020 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC1.009 days
@voic_law/46292 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC@hoghoghvekalatt/1131751 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC1.008 days
@voic_law/46970 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC@hoghoghvekalatt/11856610 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC1.0028 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@hoghoghvekalatt8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006 daysthis entry (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 80 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

29,26029,72229,49129,6555 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +393. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,191–29,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:3529,655-15
9 Nov 2026, 16:4929,670-2
8 Nov 2026, 07:5029,672-2
7 Nov 2026, 04:0829,674-17
6 Nov 2026, 06:0729,691-25
5 Nov 2026, 07:1529,716-6
4 Nov 2026, 04:3629,722+29
3 Nov 2026, 05:2529,693-6
2 Nov 2026, 03:0829,699+19
1 Nov 2026, 01:2929,680+12
31 Oct 2026, 00:4629,668+2
30 Oct 2026, 01:1029,666-1
29 Oct 2026, 00:3529,667+15
28 Oct 2026, 01:0629,652+7
27 Oct 2026, 00:3529,645+12
25 Oct 2026, 23:0929,633+1
23 Oct 2026, 23:5029,632+16
23 Oct 2026, 00:3729,616-1
21 Oct 2026, 22:4029,617+4
20 Oct 2026, 16:2829,613first reading

Engagement

674 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.12%
avg views ÷ 29,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
187 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
187
of 674 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 180 of 187 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held674 (3 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total228,628
Reactions total2,810
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
612
Videos
98
Links
699

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10,233 reactions across 650 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,80276.2%
👍1,22812.0%
😭4544.44%
🍓3193.12%
💔3073.00%
🫡460.45%
🏆450.44%
🙏260.254%
🗿60.059%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 662 of the 674 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 674 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 674 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voic_law. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 674 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 187 posts held from the last 30 days (4.81%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC396 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

اگر در جریان دادرسی خوانده ورشکسته شود دادگاه چه اقدامی انجام می‌دهد؟

  1. رسیدگی را متوقف و مراتب را به اداره تصفیه امور ورشکستگی اعلام می‌کند50%
  2. قرار رد دعوا صادر نموده و به اداره امور ورشکستگی ابلاغ می‌کند6%
  3. قرار عدم استماع دعوا را صادر نموده و به طرف دیگر اعلام می‌کند8%
  4. رسیدگی را به طور موقت، متوقف و مراتب را به طرف دیگر اعلام می‌کند36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2

15 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC404 viewsread 15 November 2026
Poll

شریک شرکت نسبی به نسبت سرمایه اش در شرکت .......

  1. تنها ضامن دیون شرکت از تاریخ ورود به آن است25%
  2. مسئول پرداخت دیون شرکت پیش و پس از ورود به آن است اگر اساسنامه اینگونه پیش بینی کرده باشد28%
  3. مسئول پرداخت دیون گذشته و بعد از ورود به شرکت است اگر در شرکت نامه چنین مقرر شده باشد15%
  4. ضامن پرداخت دیون شرکت، پیش و پس از ورود به آن است31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC485 views29 reactionsread 15 November 2026

بنام خدایی که به اراده بندگانش نه نمیگوید💝

❤25💔4

14 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC795 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

شخصی مقداری لوبیا از دیگری خریده و با آن اش پخته است در صورتی که آش موجود باشد و طرفین بیع لوبیا را اقاله کنند کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. اقاله باطل است17%
  2. مشتری باید مثل لوبیا را به بایع بدهد51%
  3. بایع به نسبت قیمت لوبیا در آش شریک می‌شود13%
  4. آش متعلق به بایع است و باید مابه‌التفاوت قیمت لوبیا و آش را به مشتری بدهد19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3😭1

14 Nov 2026, 18:46 UTC737 views5 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

هرگاه طرف مقابل دعوا نسبت به سندی که منتسب به خود او میباشد، همزمان انکار و تردید نماید و همچنین اگر نسبت به سندی که منتسب به دیگری است همزمان انکار و تردید نماید، .........

  1. دادگاه در هر دو مورد به انکار توجه نموده و به آن رسیدگی میکند16%
  2. دادگاه در هر دو مورد به تردید توجه نموده و به آن رسیدگی میکند11%
  3. دادگاه در هر دو مورد بدون توجه به ادعای مدعی، رسیدگی را ادامه میدهد20%
  4. در مورد اول، دادگاه به انکار و در مورد دوم به تردید رسیدگی مینماید53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3🍓2

14 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC695 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

جرم دارای کدام مجازات زیر باشد، شروع به جرم آن قابل کیفر نیست؟

  1. شلاق حدی23%
  2. قصاص عضو19%
  3. سلب حیات11%
  4. سه ماه تا سه سال حبس46%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

14 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,040 views7 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

الف 17 ساله با مشارکت ب 22 ساله مرتکب جرم قاچاق اسلحه با مجازات سه تا پانزده سال حبس می‌شوند دادگاه صالح برای رسیدگی به اتهام الف و ب کدام است؟

  1. اطفال و نوجوانان-اطفال و نوجوانان14%
  2. کیفری یک ویژه نوجوانان-انقلاب40%
  3. کیفری یک ویژه نوجوانان-کیفری یک ویژه نوجوانان27%
  4. اطفال و نوجوانان-انقلاب19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4👍3

14 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,000 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه در خصوص مهلت دادن به طرفین برای ادای سوگند نادرست است؟

  1. زمان این مهلت توسط دادگاه تعیین میشود؛ دادگاه مهلتی را اعطا میکند که موجب تضرر طرف مقابل نباشد20%
  2. با درخواست مهلت، تجدید وقت رسیدگی اجتنابناپذیر است24%
  3. در صورتی که مهلتِ طولانی موجب ضرر طرف شود، دادگاه میتواند وقت بعدی را خارج از نوبت تعیین نماید29%
  4. مهلت دادن به طرفین در هر سه نوع سوگند (سوگند بتی، سوگند استظهاری و سوگند تکمیلی) بلاانع است.27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2👍1

14 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC866 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

از دادگاه درخواست تامین شده و دادگاه آن را رد کرده است. تصمیم دادگاه:

  1. ظرف ۱۰ روز از تاریخ ابلاغ قابل اعتراض است و در جلسه فوق العاده به آن رسیدگی می‌شود26%
  2. از دادگاه درخواست تامین شده و دادگاه آن را رد کرده است. تصمیم دادگاه:4%
  3. قابل اعتراض نیست39%
  4. ظرف ۱۰ روز از تاریخ ابلاغ قابل اعتراض است و دادگاه در اولین جلسه به آن رسیدگی می‌کند30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4👍2

14 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC862 views13 reactionsread 15 November 2026

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم 🍀

❤13

13 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Poll

الف سفته ای در وجه ب صادر نموده و ب نیز آن را در وجه ج ظهرنویسی می‌کند در این صورت از نظر اثباتی ج در برابر الف دارنده با حسن نیت محسوب........

  1. می‌شود مگر اینکه خلاف آن ثابت شود50%
  2. می‌شود مگر اینکه تحصیل مجرمانه سند توسط ب ثابت شود18%
  3. نمی‌شود مگر اینکه خلاف آن ثابت شود17%
  4. می‌شود مگر اینکه وجود ایراد در رابطه الف و ب ثابت شود15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4

13 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC949 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026

این گروه را از دست ندید👆

❤1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 674 posts we hold for @voic_law. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@voic_law edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 51 posts on @voic_law as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
28

Polls

The 6 most recent of 449 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz181 voters

اگر در جریان دادرسی خوانده ورشکسته شود دادگاه چه اقدامی انجام می‌دهد؟

  1. رسیدگی را متوقف و مراتب را به اداره تصفیه امور ورشکستگی اعلام می‌کند50%
  2. قرار رد دعوا صادر نموده و به اداره امور ورشکستگی ابلاغ می‌کند6%
  3. قرار عدم استماع دعوا را صادر نموده و به طرف دیگر اعلام می‌کند8%
  4. رسیدگی را به طور موقت، متوقف و مراتب را به طرف دیگر اعلام می‌کند36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz155 voters

شریک شرکت نسبی به نسبت سرمایه اش در شرکت .......

  1. تنها ضامن دیون شرکت از تاریخ ورود به آن است25%
  2. مسئول پرداخت دیون شرکت پیش و پس از ورود به آن است اگر اساسنامه اینگونه پیش بینی کرده باشد28%
  3. مسئول پرداخت دیون گذشته و بعد از ورود به شرکت است اگر در شرکت نامه چنین مقرر شده باشد15%
  4. ضامن پرداخت دیون شرکت، پیش و پس از ورود به آن است31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz279 voters

شخصی مقداری لوبیا از دیگری خریده و با آن اش پخته است در صورتی که آش موجود باشد و طرفین بیع لوبیا را اقاله کنند کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. اقاله باطل است17%
  2. مشتری باید مثل لوبیا را به بایع بدهد51%
  3. بایع به نسبت قیمت لوبیا در آش شریک می‌شود13%
  4. آش متعلق به بایع است و باید مابه‌التفاوت قیمت لوبیا و آش را به مشتری بدهد19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Nov 2026, 18:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz215 voters

هرگاه طرف مقابل دعوا نسبت به سندی که منتسب به خود او میباشد، همزمان انکار و تردید نماید و همچنین اگر نسبت به سندی که منتسب به دیگری است همزمان انکار و تردید نماید، .........

  1. دادگاه در هر دو مورد به انکار توجه نموده و به آن رسیدگی میکند16%
  2. دادگاه در هر دو مورد به تردید توجه نموده و به آن رسیدگی میکند11%
  3. دادگاه در هر دو مورد بدون توجه به ادعای مدعی، رسیدگی را ادامه میدهد20%
  4. در مورد اول، دادگاه به انکار و در مورد دوم به تردید رسیدگی مینماید53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz297 voters

جرم دارای کدام مجازات زیر باشد، شروع به جرم آن قابل کیفر نیست؟

  1. شلاق حدی23%
  2. قصاص عضو19%
  3. سلب حیات11%
  4. سه ماه تا سه سال حبس46%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz354 voters

الف 17 ساله با مشارکت ب 22 ساله مرتکب جرم قاچاق اسلحه با مجازات سه تا پانزده سال حبس می‌شوند دادگاه صالح برای رسیدگی به اتهام الف و ب کدام است؟

  1. اطفال و نوجوانان-اطفال و نوجوانان14%
  2. کیفری یک ویژه نوجوانان-انقلاب40%
  3. کیفری یک ویژه نوجوانان-کیفری یک ویژه نوجوانان27%
  4. اطفال و نوجوانان-انقلاب19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 674 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 44,441
7 posts
کلینیک مالی
@elmsazanpendar · 4,619
5 posts
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 84,565
5 posts
آراء وحدت رویه دیوان عالی کشور
@araevahdatraviye · 3,661
3 posts
آموزش آزمون های وکالت، قضاوت، ارشد، سردفتری و...
@azmonhayehoqoqi · 4,276
3 posts
کلیپ های حقوقی
@cliphoqoqi · 1,418
3 posts
اطلاع رسانی دادگاه های علنی برخط(آنلاین)
@dadgaheonline · 1,396
3 posts
موسسه آموزش عالی فن آوران حکیم نیا
@fanavaranhakim · 1,508
3 posts
جزوات حقوقی
@jozvedarsihoqoq · 13,997
3 posts
کتب حقوقی
@ketabedarsihoqoq · 16,843
3 posts
مطالب و خلاصه های درسی حقوق و علوم قضایی
@kholasedarsi · 4,118
3 posts
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,490
3 posts
نمونه سوالات امتحانی حقوق
@nemonesoalathoqoq · 4,654
3 posts
فایل نشست های حقوقی
@neshastehoqoqi · 1,942
3 posts
پادکست های حقوقی
@podcasthoqoqi · 2,114
3 posts
پی دی اف های قوانین
@qavaninpdf · 5,148
3 posts
ویس های حقوقی
@vociehoqoq · 6,202
3 posts
ای‌داد | مسائل حقوقی روز
@AIDaad_Channel · 218
2 posts
ای‌داد پشتیبانی و آموزش
@Aidaadapp · 1,255
2 posts
علی مرادی ـ وکالت 1405🥇🏆
@moradi_law8 · 1,669
2 posts
تست حقوقی
@testehoqoqi · 809
2 posts
چنل حقوقی ( ساحل علم)
@lawsahel · 8,816
1 post
مهران حسنلو - مشاوره آزمون وکالت
@Mehran_hasanloo · 56,224
1 post
انجمن علمی دانشجویی حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
@sbulawssa · 13,220
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 63,476
#1
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,490
#2
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 162,301
#3
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 109,014
#4
nokatnabvekalat
@nokatnabvekalat · 21
#5
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 118,357
#6
📚کتب حقوقی وpdf ⚖️
@Legal_book · 17,863
#7
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 74,467
#8
آزمون برتر|وکالت،قضاوت
@Azmone_bartar · 20,866
#9
متون فقه - اصول فقه آزمون وکالت
@motoon_osool · 11,204
#10
صوت و تست حقوق
@law_ghazavat · 38,406
#11
بانک تست آیین دادرسی کیفری
@ayindadrasikayfarii · 9,302
#12
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 39,605
#13
تست آنلاین «وکالت»
@TEST_online1 · 11,579
#14
✨ترمینولوژی حقوق✨
@terminolojii79 · 9,553
#15
نکته و تست حقوقی
@LAWw_test · 24,076
#16
آمادگی آزمون وکالت و سردفتری
@vekalat_sardaftari · 2,981
#17
🎵آوایِ حقوق🎵
@LAWSONG · 21,169
#18
آکادمی جزا وکیفری سهامی
@jazakefari · 20,860
#19
تدریس جزا و آیین دادرسی احمد غفوری
@ahmadghaforiiii · 16,084
#20
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 22,646
#21
حقوق باراجین ⚖️
@qazlaw · 763
#22
کانال جدید سردفتری ۱۴۰۲
@sardaftari_azmon · 4,267
#23
خانه حقوق باراجین⚖
@lawhomee · 901
#24
hoghough_khososi
@hoghough_khososi · 132
#25
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 47,188
#26
⚖️مشاوره رایگان و انگیزشی وکالت⚖️
@Moshaver_vekalt · 2,992
#27
اطلاعات حقوقی | SEVDA
@law_sevda · 16,354
#28
شوق وکالت_مشاور آزمون وکالت
@shoghe_vekalaat · 7,655
#29
منابع آزمون وکالت
@azmunvekalatt · 1,725
#30
فایل و تست حقوقی
@LEGALFAQ · 5,319
#31
فایل حقوقی رابین هود
@voicelaw5040 · 13,440
#32
تست اساسی
@asasitest · 10,755
#33
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 44,441
#34
روی موج فایل🌊
@roye_movje_file400 · 12,316
#35
تست (حقوق مدنی)
@mahditazikiiiiiiiiii · 10,380
#36
خبر رسان چتر اهواز
@chatre_ahvaz · 4,333
#37
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 29,176
#38
⚖تدریس مدنی ⚖
@fahimi1375 · 9,919
#39
فایل و کتاب های حقوقی (حقوق بوک) 🇮🇷
@hoghooghboook · 46,982
#40
آسان حقوق/دکتر کریمی منفرد
@asanhoghoghh · 7,609
#41
جزوه و صوت حقوقی
@hoghooghi · 18,360
#42
کاریابی دفاتر اسناد رسمی و قضایی
@KarYabi_Daftarkhaneh · 8,680
#43
حقوق پرس
@Lawpress · 8,119
#44
کارآموزی قضاوت
@verdictiran · 3,808
#45
تا وکالت | Ta_vekalat
@ta_vekalat123 · 4,693
#46
بانک تست حقوق جزا
@banktesthoghoghjaza · 10,048
#47
تست آ.د.مدنی آنلاین
@a_dadrasi_madani99 · 7,660
#48
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,722
#49
تدریس ‌تخصصی‌ فقه ‌و‌‌ اصول ‌البچاری
@osoul_motoun · 4,952
#50
⚖️ وكيل يار
@vakilyar1 · 19,309
#51
Qiau teacher
@Qiau_teacher · 9,442
#52
آرای قضایی
@arayeghazayii · 28,990
#53
مدنی و آدم عبدغیور(کانال اول)
@abdeghayour1403 · 7,678
#54
تست آ.د.کیفری آنلاین
@a_dadrasi_keyfari99 · 8,839
#55
کانون سردفتران و دفتریاران
@notary_ir · 17,236
#56
تست مدنی آنلاین💛
@madanionline · 11,696
#57
فایل و ویس حقوقی حقوق بان
@hoghoghBann · 11,283
#58
کانال حقوقی آیدین لطف اله زادگان
@hoghoogh_khososi · 2,010
#59
🌎همایش ها و رویدادهای حقوقی و صنفی(در پیوند با وکلای دادگستری)
@LAWCONFERENCES · 10,477
#60
همخوانی ۷۰ روزه مرکزوکلا ۱۴۰۱ آزمون شهریور
@jambandi_vekalat_online · 1,215
#61
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 41,977
#62
کانون حقوق ایران🇮🇷
@kanon_hoghogh_iran · 9,662
#63
بنیان حقوق(آقای قاضی)👨‍⚖⚖️
@BonyanHj · 9,165
#64
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,615
#65
چنل حقوقی ( ساحل علم)
@lawsahel · 8,816
#66
⚖️📚 دادگستر (حقوقی) 📚⚖
@dadgostar_hoghogh99 · 12,572
#67
تدریس ماده به ماده قانون مدنی
@law0024 · 11,707
#68
رسانه خبری و رفاهی قضات ایران
@refahighozat · 12,128
#69
موسسه آموزش عالی آزادچتردانش
@chatredanesh · 13,897
#70
آیین دادرسی مدنی | استاد شرقی
@ayin_dadrasi_madani · 15,269
#71
انجمن علمی حقوق
@IranLawAssociation · 13,287
#72
بهرام بهاری | آقای عزت نفس
@bahrambaharii · 9,679
#73
انجمن‌حقوق‌شناسی
@iranianlls · 11,047
#74
آموزش آزمون های حقوقی( نکته وتست) موسسه عادلان
@hoghoghvekalatt · 16,629
#75
بانک جامع نکته و تست حقوق ((( تمام قوانین )))
@banktestjamemahdijomepour · 9,376
#76
بانک تست آیین دادرسی مدنی
@banktestayindadrasimadani · 11,805
#77
اصول‌ فقه تحلیلی (استاد بنی صدر)
@osool583 · 6,571
#78
تست ح.جزا استاد غفوری📝
@law_Test5 · 2,610
#79
آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام
@drjavaherkalam · 8,328
#80
فایل های حقوقی برای وکلا و کارآموزان
@law_radin · 4,446
#81
Qiau Link
@qiaulink · 10,585
#82
J o z v e
@Qiau_jozve · 26,861
#83
دفاتر اسناد رسمی ایران
@IranNotaryPublic · 10,380
#84
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی قزوین
@qiaunews · 11,122
#85
JoJo Edits
@JoJoEditz · 643
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

nokatnabvekalat
@nokatnabvekalat · 21
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
🎵آوایِ حقوق🎵
@LAWSONG · 21,169
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,490
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 63,476
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
صوت و تست حقوق
@law_ghazavat · 38,406
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
⚖️ وكيل يار
@vakilyar1 · 19,309
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 October 2026
نکته و تست حقوقی
@LAWw_test · 24,076
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 22,646
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
آزمون برتر|وکالت،قضاوت
@Azmone_bartar · 20,866
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 47,188
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
کانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,125
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 39,605
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 44,441
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 162,301
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,722
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 118,357
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
کتابخانه مجازی حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,853
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 109,014
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 74,467
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
آرای قضایی
@arayeghazayii · 28,990
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
فایل و کتاب های حقوقی (حقوق بوک) 🇮🇷
@hoghooghboook · 46,982
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 41,977
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️” (@voic_law), 29,655 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voic_law.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.