Channel
@DrNadjarzadeh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,416subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 8 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002363761661 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrNadjarzadeh |
| First recorded | 8 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrNadjarzadeh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 1,416 | +18 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:22 | 1,398 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (4 November 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,235 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 14 | 41.2% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
صحبتم با دوستانی که تازه امتحان وکالت دادن هم هست میتونید با یک برنامه برای امسال بخونید اگر هدفتون شرکت در این دوره هست، به ایدی زیر پیام بدین که ادمین ها راهنمایی کنن 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @ndj_admin
👍4❤2
و اینو قبلا به دانشجو های دکتری هم گفته بودم... باور کنید مسیر لذتبخشتر از مقصدیه که بهش میرسید 💯
❤2🏆2
پیشنهادم به شما هم اینه که برای رسیدن عجله نکنید و به خودتون استرس ندید
👏5
نمونهش آزمون دکتری خودم بود که کمکم میخوندم هیچ استرسی به خودم ندادم و نگفتم که امسال حتما باید قبول بشم ...
🔥3👏2
و پذیرفتم چیزی که واقعاً ارزش داره و میخوام بهدست بیارم، قرار نیست یکشبه و معجزهآسا اتفاق بیفته فهمیدم اینجا با یک مسیر طولانی و پرفرازونشیب طرفم که باید با صبوری و قدمهای کوچک اما پیوسته طی بشه 💪
❤2👏2
اتفاقاً چون این افراد در مسیر رشد بودن ، شکستهای مختلفی سر راهشون قرار گرفته و قطعاً جدا از این شکستها، موانع سنگین و چالشهای زیادی هم وجود داشتن که این مسیر رو هزار برابر سختتر میکردن، ولی خداروشکر که همهی اون روزهای یکروز میگذره
👍2👏2
خودم رو زیاد توی پیج معرفی کردم، ولی امروز میخوام یهجور دیگه و از زاویهای متفاوت خودمو معرفی کنم. خیلیوقتها ما آدمها رو فقط در نقطه اوج و موفقیتشون میبینیم، اما واقعیت اینه که آدمهایی که امروز از نظر شما موفق هستن، به این معنی نیست که هیچوقت شکست، ناامیدی یا بنبست رو توی زندگیشون تجربه نکردن؛ اتفاقاً پشت هر موفقیت، کلی داستان شنیدنی هست
❤2👏2
در نهایت، بعد از ثبت نهایی سفارش (که هزینهاش صفر و کاملاً رایگانه)، لینکهای دانلود تمامی منابع بلافاصله براتون به نمایش درمیاد میتونید با یک کلیک، همه رو کاملاً رایگان دانلود کنید و با خیال راحت مطالعهشون کنید🚀📥
روند کار خیلی سادهست، پلهبهپله پیش بریم👇🏻 ۱️⃣ اول از همه، روی لینکی که میزارم براتون کلیک کنید https://www.nadjarzadeh.ir/product/phd-tenders-law-pack/ ۲️⃣ وارد صفحه محصول میشید؛ کافیه روی گزینه "افزودن به سبد خرید" بزنید. ۳️⃣ فیلدها و اطلاعاتی که فرم ازتون خواسته رو با دقت کامل پر کنید (نگران نباشید، اطلاعاتتون کاملاً امنه و فقط برای ثبت سفارش نیازه)📝
👏1🤝1
اما بعد از انتشار اون، کلی پیام پر مهر و البته سوال داشتید که: 👈"چطور باید این فایلها رو دانلود کنیم؟" 👈"مسیر دسترسی بهشون چطوریه؟"
چند روز پیش، فایلهای مربوط به "منابع معاملات دولتی" رو براتون اینجا قرار دادم... مطلبی که خیلیهاتون پیگیرش بودید و درخواست کرده بودید📚👇
آخر هفتهتون بخیر و شادی😊 امیدوارم حالتون عالی باشه آزمون وکالت امسال چطور بود؟ خسته نباشید جانانه به همه شما 💪⚖️
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DrNadjarzadeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داوری و تجارت بین الملل | ریحانه نجارزاده” (@DrNadjarzadeh), 1,416 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrNadjarzadeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.