🔘 درود بر دوستان عزیز، در این مورد یک نظریه مشورتی هم از اداره حقوقی قوه قضائیه صادر شده است که در پست بعدی منتشر میکنم. #خوانده_صوری #صلاحیت
👍1

Channel
@arayeghazayii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,601subscribers
+298 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001000873617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arayeghazayii |
| Description | 🏛 توسعه حقوق کاربردی. ⚖️ پیوند تئوری و تجربه 🏦 نقد آرای روز مراجع قضایی. |
| Created | 4 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arayeghazayii |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 28,601 | +17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 28,584 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 28,576 | +30 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 28,546 | +6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 28,540 | +21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 28,519 | +19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 28,500 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 28,489 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:09 | 28,480 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 28,481 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 28,480 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 28,466 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 28,475 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 28,471 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 28,467 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 28,461 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 28,462 | +12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 28,450 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 28,448 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 28,436 | first reading |
133 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 92,023 |
| Reactions total | 538 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 22:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,040 reactions across 132 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 585 | 56.3% | |
| ❤ | 357 | 34.3% | |
| 😁 | 62 | 5.96% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 2.21% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,040 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔘 درود بر دوستان عزیز، در این مورد یک نظریه مشورتی هم از اداره حقوقی قوه قضائیه صادر شده است که در پست بعدی منتشر میکنم. #خوانده_صوری #صلاحیت
👍1
⚖ صدور قرار عدم استماع دعوا نسبت به خواسته الزام به تحویل نیم ساعت حقآبه با استناد به پاسخ استعلام از اداره امور آب شهرستان مبنی بر اینکه؛ "موضوع معامله طرفین خارج از اراضی پایاب چاه است و به نام اشخاص ثالث بوده و نقل و انتقال آن قانونا ممنوع میباشد." #اداره_امور_آب #استعلام #الزام_به_تحویل_مبیع #قرارداد #چاه_آب #حق_آبه
❤3
🟡 آیا رأی وحدت رویه شماره ۶۵۹ هیأت عمومی دیوان عالی کشور که در زمان حاکمیت قانون قبلی صادر شده بود همچنان معتبر و قابل استناد است⁉️ #قانون_لاحق #جرم_مستمر #قانون_سابق #تصرف_عدوانی #نسخ #رأی_وحدت_رویه
👍4
⚖ استدلال فوقالعاده و عالی یک رأی لزوما به معنی تشخیص درست نیست❗️❌️ #جهات_موضوعی #جهات_حکمی #رأی #تشخیص #دادرس #استدلال
👍4
⚖ اما استدلال این دادگاه عالی درمورد عدم شمول مرور زمان در جرایم مستمر، به استناد *رأی وحدت رویه شماره ۶۵۹ هیأت عمومی دیوان عالی کشور*، صحیح است" #جرم_مستمر #ممانعت_از_حق #ایجاد_مزاحمت_ملکی #قرار_موقوفی_تعقیب #مرور_زمان
❤4
⚖ استدلال دادگاه تجدیدنظر از این جهت نادرست است که؛ "شمول اعتبار امر مختوم درمورد جرایم تصرف عدوانی و ایجاد مزاحمت ملکی را علیالاطلاق منتفی دانسته است." #تصرف_عدوانی #استدلال #جرایم_مستمر #اعتبار_امر_مختومه
👍5
⚪ الزام به استرداد دادخواست/ دعوا یا نوشتن استرداد استرداد از زبان خواهان، به جای اظهارنظر درمورد دعوا یا تلاش برای رفع نقص و قابلیت استماع بخشیدن به دعوا❗️❌️ #اصل_قابل_استماع_بودن_دعاوی #شکل_گرایی #استرداد_دادخواست #آمار_گرایی #رفع_نقص
❤4👍1
🔸 علت اصلی صدور قرار موقوفی تعقیب توسط دادگاه بدوی، شمول اعتبار امر مختومه بوده نه مرور زمان، اشاره دادگاه تجدیدنظر به مرور زمان ارتباطی به رأی منقوض ندارد و یک استدلال کلی بوده است!
❤4
⚖ این هم رأی دادگاه نخستین که در مرحله تجدیدنظر نقض شده است. #قرار_موقوفی_تعقیب #اعتبار_امر_مختومه #نقض
👍3
⚖ نقض *قرار موقوفی تعقیب* توسط دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان با تأکید بر اینکه "جرایم تصرف عدوانی و ایجاد مزاحمت ملکی از *جرایم مستمر* هستند و مشمول مرور زمان یا اعتبار امر محتومه نمیشوند" #قرار_موقوفی_تعقیب #تصرف_عدوانی #مرور_زمان #اعتبار_امر_مختومه #جرم_مستمر
👍6❤2👎1
🟠 چکیده: اگر در بیع عین معین معلوم شود که مبیع (کالا) وجود نداشته و بیع باطل شود، فروشنده باید پول دریافتی (ثمن) را برگرداند. اگر ارزش پول به دلیل تورم یا گذشت زمان کم شده باشد، فروشنده مسئول جبران این خسارت است. این قاعده نهتنها در موارد مستحقللغیر (مواد ۳۹۰ و ۳۹۱ قانون مدنی)، بلکه در بیع باطل به دلیل عدم وجود مبیع نیز إعمال میشود. 🔰 نظریه مشورتی اداره کل حقوقی قوه قضائیه به شماره ۱۳۹۵/۸/۲۳-۷/۹۵/۲۱۱۴ 🔸 استعلام…
❤5👍3
🟠 چکیده: امکان طرح دعاوی طاری مثل جلب ثالث در ضمن رسیدگی به اعتراض ثالث وجود ندارد؛ مگر آنکه با هدف تقویت موضع طرح شود. 🔰 نظریه مشورتی اداره کل حقوقی قوه قضائیه به شماره ۱۳۹۸/۱۰/۱۷-۷/۹۸/۱۲۹۸ 🔹شماره پرونده: ۹۸-۱۲۷-۱۲۹۸ ح 🔸 استعلام: شخص ثالث به حکم قطعی اعتراض میکند. (اعتراض ثالث اصلی) و در اولین جلسه دادرسی دادخواست جلب ثالث تقدیم مینماید. آیا تقدیم دادخواست جلب ثالث در مرحله رسیدگی به اعتراض ثالث ممکن است؟ ◽ پا…
❤6👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @arayeghazayii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@arayeghazayii edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🗳🗳 درود بر دوستان عزیز، درمورد این پرونده که داخل اسلایدها توضیح دادم، شما بعنوان قاضی دادگاه تجدیدنظر چه تصمیمی میگیرید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳🏛 شما با استدلال دادرس دادگاه موافق هستید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📬🗳آیا در فرض صدور "دستور عدم پرداخت و مسدودی حساب"، میتوان بدون اخذ خسارت احتمالی، قرار تأمین خواسته صادر کرد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳🏛 این مدل پروندهخوانی رو دوست دارید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳📬 شما اگر قاضی این پرونده بودید چه تصمیمی میگرفتید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳❗️به نظر شما هیأت عمومی کدام رأی را تأیید میکند؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرای قضایی” (@arayeghazayii), 28,601 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arayeghazayii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.