Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آرای قضایی

Channel

آرای قضایی

@arayeghazayii

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,962subscribers

+659 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000873617
TypeChannel
Username@arayeghazayii
Description🏛 توسعه حقوق کاربردی. ⚖️ پیوند تئوری و تجربه 🏦 نقد آرای روز مراجع قضایی.
Created4 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/arayeghazayii

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

28,30328,96928,6365 August 2026 — 28,303 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,313 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,315 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,351 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,360 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,369 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,378 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,389 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,395 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,409 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,417 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,422 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,424 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,436 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,448 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,450 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,462 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,461 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,467 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,471 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,475 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,466 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,480 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,481 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,480 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,489 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,500 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,519 subscribers10 September 2026 — 28,540 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,546 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,576 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,584 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,601 subscribers2 October 2026 — 28,737 subscribers7 October 2026 — 28,762 subscribers11 October 2026 — 28,790 subscribers14 October 2026 — 28,808 subscribers15 October 2026 — 28,811 subscribers17 October 2026 — 28,820 subscribers18 October 2026 — 28,827 subscribers19 October 2026 — 28,828 subscribers20 October 2026 — 28,837 subscribers21 October 2026 — 28,849 subscribers22 October 2026 — 28,859 subscribers23 October 2026 — 28,867 subscribers24 October 2026 — 28,870 subscribers25 October 2026 — 28,884 subscribers26 October 2026 — 28,898 subscribers27 October 2026 — 28,902 subscribers28 October 2026 — 28,903 subscribers31 October 2026 — 28,904 subscribers1 November 2026 — 28,928 subscribers2 November 2026 — 28,939 subscribers3 November 2026 — 28,951 subscribers4 November 2026 — 28,966 subscribers5 November 2026 — 28,961 subscribers6 November 2026 — 28,969 subscribers7 November 2026 — 28,962 subscribers28,9625 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 94 days, net +659. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,203–29,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:0128,962-7
6 Nov 2026, 09:5028,969+8
5 Nov 2026, 09:0728,961-5
4 Nov 2026, 05:1728,966+15
3 Nov 2026, 02:2928,951+12
2 Nov 2026, 04:3828,939+11
1 Nov 2026, 04:2928,928+24
31 Oct 2026, 04:5028,904+1
28 Oct 2026, 22:2028,903+1
27 Oct 2026, 22:3028,902+4
26 Oct 2026, 22:3928,898+14
25 Oct 2026, 22:1728,884+14
24 Oct 2026, 20:1028,870+3
23 Oct 2026, 20:3728,867+8
22 Oct 2026, 20:2528,859+10
21 Oct 2026, 17:0728,849+12
20 Oct 2026, 11:4628,837+9
19 Oct 2026, 14:5428,828+1
18 Oct 2026, 16:0528,827+7
17 Oct 2026, 13:5828,820first reading

Engagement

275 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.56%
avg views ÷ 28,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
101 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.556%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
101
of 275 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held275 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total162,545
Reactions total904
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,560
Videos
≈282
Links
≈4,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 07s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,386 reactions across 274 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,33656.0%
❤79933.5%
😁1305.45%
👎1014.23%
🙏200.838%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 274 of the 275 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 275 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 101 posts held from the last 30 days (19.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC230 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ نظر دوستان و صدور یک نظریه مشورتی از اداره کل حقوقی قوه قضائیه درمورد موضوع دال بر الزامی نبودن ثبت ضمانت در سامانه صیاد و وصف تجاری داشتن امضای ظهر چک ◽ این امر یک فایده عملی هم دارد؛ با توجه به الزامی نبودن ثبت ضمانت چک در سامانه و همپنین عدم امکان عملی ثبت آن، لذا صرف امضای ظهر چک دلالت بر ضمانت خواهد داشت، بخصوص که طبق قانون اصلاحی صدور چک، برای ظهرنویسی، امضای فیزیکی سند لازم نیست و ثبت انتقال چک در سامانه صی…

❤5

7 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC495 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🟣 لزوم تفکیک بین *شرایط دادخواست*، *شرایط اقامه دعوا* و *وجود ابهام در خواسته* #شرایط_طرح_دعوا #قرار_رد_دعوا #اخذ_توضیح #رفع_نقص #ابهام

🙏3👍1

7 Nov 2026, 05:08 UTC750 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ ضمانت از صادرکننده چک صیادی بدون ثبت آن در سامانه، چه وصفی دارد، آیا تجاری است یا مدنی؟ #چک_صیادی #ثبت #صادرکننده #سند_تجاری #قانون_تجارت #ضمانت

👍3

6 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,070 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ یک رأی دیگر از دیوان عالی کشور در پذیرش اعاده دادرسی و تأکيد بر لزوم دقت محاکم در تعیین مجازات و إعمال قواعد تکرار و تعدد جرم و تخفیف مجازات #تکرار_جرم #تخفیف_مجازات #مجازات #دیوان_عالی_کشور #اعاده_دادرسی

❤6

6 Nov 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,140 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ این هم رأی پرونده و صدور حکم بر محکومیت خوانده در قبال محمدعلی و قرار سقوط دعوا نسبت به آقا مهدی (پدر) #تفکیک_خواسته #خوانده #حکم_محکومیت #قرار_سقوط_دعوا #پرونده

👍3❤1

6 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC≈1,070 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🔸 نظر یکی از دوستان همراه و فرهیخته درمورد رأی دیوان عالی کشور 👇👇 ✍ "عرض ادب و احترام هر واژه‌اے ڪه در رأے قضایی به‌ڪار می‌رود، باید در سرنوشت محڪوم‌علیه اثر حقوقی خود را آشڪار سازد. اگر دادگاه از «جهات تخفیف» سخن می‌گوید، این جهات نباید تنها زینت استدلال رأے باشد، بلڪه باید در میزان و ڪیفیت مجازات نیز بازتاب پیدا ڪند. تعیینِ حداقلِ مجازاتِ قانونی، به‌خودی‌خود تخفیف نیست؛ زیرا حداقل مجازات قانونی، انتخابی است ڪه قا…

❤13

6 Nov 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,100 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ منجز نبودن خواسته‌ها، مهم‌ترین نقص این دادخواست است که البته از موارد رفع نقص می‌باشد اما اگر بعد از اعلام شماره و مشخصات اسناد و قراردادها، مشخص شود یک یا چند نفر از ذی‌نفعان، طرف دعوا قرار نگرفته‌اند دادگاه چاره‌ای جز صدور *قرار عدم استماع دعوا* _البته بعد از تشکیل جلسه اول دادرسی_ نخواهد داشت #خواسته #رفع_نقص #قرار_عدم_استماع_دعوا #مدیر_دفتر #جلسه_اول_دادرسی #دعوای_ظنی_و_احتمالی

❤7

6 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,160 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ اعلام رضایت یکی از خواهان‌ها به نام مهدی، در اثناء رسیدگی ◽ شماره فاکتور مندرج در رضایت‌نامه را با شماره مندرج در دادخواست تطبیق بدهید #انصراف_کلی_از_دعوا #خواهان #سهم #فاکتور #رضایت_نامه

👍4

4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,500 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ طرح دعوای الزام به تحویل مبیع و اعلام رضایت بعدی یکی از خواهان‌ها در جریان دادرسی ◽ رأی دادگاه متعاقبا منتشر خواهد شد #مبیع #مورد_معامله #خوانده #دعوای_الزام_به_تحویل_مبیع

👍3👎1

4 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,460 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ درود بر دوستان عزیز، به نظر شما آیا این دادخواست، به نحو صحیحی تنظیم شده است؟ #خواهان #دعوا #خواسته #دادخواست

👎8❤1👍1

4 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,520 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🟠 چکیده: دعوی اثبات وقوع بیع در املاکی که سابقه ثبتی دارند 🔸 صورتجلسه نشست قضایی؛ تاریخ برگزاری: ۱۳۹۵/۱۱/۱۴ برگزار شده توسط: استان اصفهان/ شهر خمینی شهر 🔘 پرسش آیا دعوی اثبات وقوع بیع در املاک دارای سابقه ثبتی قابلیت استماع دارد؟ ✔️ نظر هیئت عالی: نظر به اینکه خواهان با طرح دعوای اثبات وقوع بیع املاکی که دارای سابقه ثبتی دارند، قصد دارد از آثار آن که اثبات انتقال مالکیت است، بهره بگیرد، در حالی که مطابق مواد ۲۲، …

❤5👍2

4 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,400 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⚖ رأی دیوان عالی کشور در پذیرش اعاده دادرسی به جهت عدم رعایت مقررات مربوط به *نحوه إعمال تخفیف مجازات* پ ن؛ هرچند این رأی در زمان حاکمیت قانون قبلی صادر شده اما مقررات مربوط به اعاده دادرسی کیفری و نحوه تخفیف مجازات (کاهش مجازات به کمتر از حداقل) در قوانین فعلی تغییر خاصی نکرده است #قانون_آیین_دادرسی_کیفری #اصل_فردی_کردن_مجازات #تخفیف_مجازات #دیوان_عالی_کشور #اعاده_دادرسی

❤3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 275 posts we hold for @arayeghazayii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@arayeghazayii edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 22 posts on @arayeghazayii as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Oct 2026, 20:23 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

🗳🗳به نظر شما کدام یک از این تصمیمات، مطابقت بیشتری با قانون و اصول حقوقی دارند⁉️

  1. عدول از دستور فروش🤨54%
  2. تصمیم به عدول از عدول🧐46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Oct 2026, 20:56 UTCAnonymous Poll100 voters

به نظر شما در چنین مواردی دادگاه می‌تواند خواسته را توصیف و حمل بر *اعاده دادرسی نسبت به حکم* کند⁉️

  1. خیر چه لزومی دارد🤨59%
  2. بله چه اشکال دارد🧐41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 20:18 UTCAnonymous Poll165 voters

🗳 نظر شما چیست⁉️

  1. اظهارنظر درباره جهات رد دادرس مقدم بر صلاحیت دادگاه است🤨67%
  2. بهتر است دادرس شعبه قرار عدم صلاحیت صادر کند🧐33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTCAnonymous Poll193 voters

🗳🗳 به نظر شما کدام یک از این دو رأی، مطابقت بیشتری با قانون دارد⁉️

  1. حکم محکومیت شهرداری🧐66%
  2. قرار عدم استماع دعوا🤨34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

🗳🗳 درود بر دوستان عزیز، درمورد این پرونده که داخل اسلایدها توضیح دادم، شما بعنوان قاضی دادگاه تجدیدنظر چه تصمیمی می‌گیرید؟

  1. به دلیل عدم احراز سوءنیت خاص، ضمن نقض حکم محکومیت، متهمان را تبرئه می‌کنم😎39%
  2. به دلیل اینکه صرف سوار کردن شاکی، بدون رضایت او بوده، حکم دادگاه کیفری دو را عینا تأیید می‌کنم🤨33%
  3. به دلیل وجود انگیزه وصول طلب، ضمن تأیید حکم محکومیت، مجازات حبس را تبدیل به جزای نقدی می‌‌کنم🧐28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTCAnonymous Poll156 voters

🗳🏛 شما با استدلال دادرس دادگاه موافق هستید؟

  1. خیر، اجتهاد در برابر نص است🤨67%
  2. بله، عجب استدلالی کرده🧐33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 275 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 108,816
#1
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 47,319
#2
اطلاعات حقوقى و قضايى
@hoghooghivaghazaie · 49,212
#3
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 42,063
#4
کارآموزی قضاوت
@verdictiran · 3,778
#5
بانک آرای قضایی
@Lawpress_Arayeghazayi · 21,657
#6
کانال اخبار و جزوات دانشگاه علوم قضایی
@jozvehujsas · 4,150
#7
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 63,294
#8
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 29,132
#9
حقوق املاک(مسیّبی نیا)
@hoghoogh_amlaak · 7,212
#10
بسیج دانشجویی دانشگاه علوم قضایی
@bsujsas · 1,403
#11
انجمن علمی دانشجویی دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری
@anjomanelmi_ujsas · 6,098
#12
رویه قضایی زمین
@LandLaw_ir · 6,299
#13
حقوق مدنی دادرس
@lawdadras · 15,929
#14
کانال گنجینه آراء و نظرات حقوقی و قضایی
@aranazarat · 2,150
#15
کارآموزی وکالت (کارآموز یار)
@karamooz_vekalat · 23,951
#16
رویه قضایی
@RaviyehGhazaei · 13,047
#17
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 160,504
#18
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,574
#19
کانال منصب قضاوت
@ghezavat110 · 4,181
#20
رویه قضایی دادگاه حقوقی
@judicialprocedure · 2,969
#21
🌎همایش ها و رویدادهای حقوقی و صنفی(در پیوند با وکلای دادگستری)
@LAWCONFERENCES · 10,463
#22
اخبار عدلیه
@akhbare_adlie · 8,654
#23
hoghough_khososi
@hoghough_khososi · 132
#24
اتحادیه انجمن‌های علمی دانشجویی حقوق ایران
@lawunion · 5,212
#25
🇮🇷 کانال کانون قضات ایران 🇮🇷
@kanooneghozat · 7,171
#26
وکیل مدافع
@vakilmodafe · 1,348
#27
چنل حقوقی ( ساحل علم)
@lawsahel · 8,791
#28
رسانه خبری و رفاهی قضات ایران
@refahighozat · 12,121
#29
حقوق، مالی و اقتصاد
@mohamadsadeghi_ir · 1,775
#30
رضا ثابت راسخ
@Sabet_Rasekh · 4,840
#31
رسکاد | رسانه کارمندان (اداری) دستگاه قضا
@reskad · 13,733
#32
گروه مطالعات نظام پیمانکاری
@pmpgroup · 1,772
#33
حقوق‌خوانان
@hoghoughkhanan · 844
#34
پژوهشکده حقوق و قانون ایران
@iranian_law · 3,896
#35
" اندیشکده قسط "
@qest_ujsas · 1,275
#36
🇮🇷اخبار حقوقی ایران 🇮🇷
@mosahebevekalat · 10,061
#37
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 118,005
#38
مدرسه آنلاین حقوق | Lawcenter
@lawcenter_ir · 5,811
#39
انجمن علمی حقوق دانشگاه تهران
@Lawut_anjomanelmi · 13,778
#40
انجمن‌حقوق‌شناسی
@iranianlls · 11,020
#41
کانال حقوقدانان ایران
@iiau_iranianlawyer · 3,009
#42
حقوق مدنی⚖
@LAAW98 · 24,591
#43
حقوق بانکی:::یاسر مرادی
@bankinglaws · 16,383
#44
فایل و کتاب های حقوقی (حقوق بوک) 🇮🇷
@hoghooghboook · 46,812
#45
چتردانش اهواز
@chatreahvaz · 17,618
#46
رسانه حقوقی حرف
@harfagency · 3,270
#47
کانال ارتباطی دانشکده حقوق با دانشجویان
@lawfacultypardis · 1,502
#48
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 46,170
#49
دپارتمان حقوق کاربردی چتردانش
@chatredanesh_vakil · 2,774
#50
تدریس ‌تخصصی‌ فقه ‌و‌‌ اصول ‌البچاری
@osoul_motoun · 4,962
#51
دادبان عدالت
@dadeban_edalat · 514
#52
حقوق پرس
@Lawpress · 8,137
#53
مشارکت در ساخت (دعاوی ملکی)
@mosharekatdarsakhtfarhad · 4,265
#54
انجمن علمی حقوق
@IranLawAssociation · 13,246
#55
آیت الله محقق داماد
@mohaghegh_damad · 1,885
#56
رسانه جامع کارکنان قوه قضائیه
@dadgostari96 · 12,922
#57
تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️
@voic_law · 29,674
#58
مدرسه علوم جنایی
@CriminalSciencesSchool · 4,492
#59
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,932
#60
کانال حقوقی آیدین لطف اله زادگان
@hoghoogh_khososi · 1,997
#61
اخبار مجلس 🇮🇷
@AkhbarMajles_ir · 72,112
#62
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 39,392
#63
📚کتب حقوقی وpdf ⚖️
@Legal_book · 17,844
#64
رسانه خبری باشگاه وکلا
@lawyersclubnews · 7,037
#65
ح . مثل حقوق
@meslehoghogh · 9,874
#66
بنیان حقوق(آقای قاضی)👨‍⚖⚖️
@BonyanHj · 9,176
#67
میاسای ز آموختن یک زمان 📚 Never stop learning 📚 حقوق و ایران / Law & Iran
@drhassanmohseni · 1,253
#68
آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام
@drjavaherkalam · 8,272
#69
شورای صنفی دانشگاه علوم قضایی
@shoraujsas · 1,246
#70
الجزیره فارسی
@AjaNews_fa1 · 2,203
#71
عبدالرضاسلطانی ۱۶۸🎒
@abdorezasoltani · 4,177
#72
متون حقوقی (ازمونهای ارشد و دکتری)
@Legallmoton · 6,769
#73
شهرداد
@dadshahr96 · 19,810
#74
استخدام های استان اردبیل
@eestekhdam_ardabil · 5,991
#75
قانون
@ganoon1400 · 9,410
#76
آرشیو عبدی مدیا
@AbdiMedia · 51,294
#77
کانال رسمی اسكودا
@skoodaa · 12,822
#78
کانون وکلای دادگستری اصفهان
@isfahanbar · 4,164
#79
تَلخندسیاسی‌ اجتماعی
@Talkhand_Siyasi2 · 86,421
#80
LAW STUDY ⚖️
@lawstudyy · 3,482
#81
اولکامیز
@ulkamiziran · 4,339
#82
مطالعات املاک و اسناد
@ketabesabti · 17,284
#83
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,685
#84
انجمن علوم قضایی ایران
@anjomano_ir · 2,096
#85

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 47,319
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
بانک آرای قضایی
@Lawpress_Arayeghazayi · 21,657
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
اطلاعات حقوقى و قضايى
@hoghooghivaghazaie · 49,212
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 42,063
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
حقوق مدنی⚖
@LAAW98 · 24,591
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 63,294
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
کانال حقوق
@hoghoogh · 26,086
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,574
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 108,816
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
صوت و تست حقوق
@law_ghazavat · 38,269
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 29,132
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
کتابخانه مجازی حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,810
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️
@voic_law · 29,674
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
شهرداد
@dadshahr96 · 19,810
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 October 2026
فایل و کتاب های حقوقی (حقوق بوک) 🇮🇷
@hoghooghboook · 46,812
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
جملات هشت ریشتری
@Hashtrishterii · 76,820
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,685
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آرای قضایی” (@arayeghazayii), 28,962 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arayeghazayii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.