Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال تست رابین هود

Channel

کانال تست رابین هود

@testerobinhood

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

84,714subscribers

+4,218 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002027843293
TypeChannel
Username@testerobinhood
Descriptionتبلیغات: @law_admins رابین هود اصلی مدیریت👇👇 @Robinhoodoriginal 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜ ⬜ ☫︎ ⬜ ⬜ 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 کانال رابین هود @lawvoicee کانال کارآموزی رابین هود @dadgahmajzi زاپاس کانال https://t.me/lawvoiice
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/testerobinhood

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

80,49684,71482,6058 August 2026 — 80,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 80,496 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80,585 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80,660 subscribers11 August 2026 — 80,731 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,772 subscribers13 August 2026 — 80,821 subscribers14 August 2026 — 80,872 subscribers16 August 2026 — 81,046 subscribers17 August 2026 — 81,124 subscribers18 August 2026 — 81,162 subscribers19 August 2026 — 81,217 subscribers20 August 2026 — 81,274 subscribers21 August 2026 — 81,318 subscribers22 August 2026 — 81,329 subscribers24 August 2026 — 81,450 subscribers25 August 2026 — 81,505 subscribers26 August 2026 — 81,549 subscribers27 August 2026 — 81,607 subscribers28 August 2026 — 81,672 subscribers29 August 2026 — 81,735 subscribers30 August 2026 — 82,001 subscribers31 August 2026 — 82,119 subscribers1 September 2026 — 82,164 subscribers2 September 2026 — 82,273 subscribers3 September 2026 — 82,460 subscribers6 September 2026 — 82,634 subscribers9 September 2026 — 82,807 subscribers11 September 2026 — 82,908 subscribers13 September 2026 — 82,966 subscribers15 September 2026 — 83,089 subscribers17 September 2026 — 83,309 subscribers19 September 2026 — 83,498 subscribers26 September 2026 — 83,925 subscribers4 October 2026 — 84,339 subscribers9 October 2026 — 84,714 subscribers8 August 20269 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 62 days, net +4,218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,863–85,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 01:0184,714+375
4 Oct 2026, 14:2284,339+414
26 Sept 2026, 11:3883,925+427
19 Sept 2026, 15:3883,498+189
17 Sept 2026, 05:5683,309+220
15 Sept 2026, 07:1983,089+123
13 Sept 2026, 14:1782,966+58
11 Sept 2026, 22:0182,908+101
9 Sept 2026, 14:5782,807+173
6 Sept 2026, 07:5782,634+174
3 Sept 2026, 22:1982,460+187
2 Sept 2026, 16:4482,273+109
1 Sept 2026, 17:1282,164+45
31 Aug 2026, 17:4482,119+118
30 Aug 2026, 15:3582,001+266
29 Aug 2026, 12:2481,735+63
28 Aug 2026, 11:3481,672+65
27 Aug 2026, 10:5481,607+58
26 Aug 2026, 08:3381,549+44
25 Aug 2026, 10:5581,505first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 84,714 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.208%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held58 (6 July 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total207,490
Reactions total397
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
99
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42m 40s
Average length
42m 40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,688 reactions across 54 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,29776.8%
👍21412.7%
💯392.31%
😍392.31%
👏352.07%
🥰352.07%
🔥291.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2026, 10:28 UTC≈3,750 views5 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

بهترین اساتید ایران در #کمپ_مهرانه برای #آزمون_وکالت آماده شو 17.000.000 تومان 👈🏻 14.000.000 تومان مازندران #قایمشهر همراه با اقامتگاه جهت مشاوره و ثبت نام 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 09118990650 09919597371 www.dadmehrnovin.ir instagram.com/dadmehrnovin

❤4👍1

3 Oct 2026, 12:28 UTC≈8,290 views8 reactionsread 9 October 2026

آیدی جهت تهیه دوره کاراموزی و ضربتی👇🏻 @law_adminlink

❤8

30 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈4,320 views2 reactionsread 3 October 2026

آیدی جهت تهیه دوره کاراموزی و ضربتی👇🏻 @law_adminlink

❤2

30 Sept 2026, 07:41 UTC≈14,100 views30 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه در خصوص تامین کیفری در بحث نیابت قضایی، صحیح نیست؟

  1. بازپرس معطی نیابت می‌تواند در هنگام صدور قرار نیابت قضائی نوع تامین را معین کند.10%
  2. در موردی که تقاضای اخذ تامین نشده باشد، بازپرس مجری نیابت می‌تواند با نظر خود تامین مناسب اخذ کند.19%
  3. بازپرس معطی نیابت می‌تواند اختیار اخذ تامین و نوع آن را به بازپرس مجری نیابت، واگذار کند.17%
  4. اگر از نظر بازپرس مجری نیابت، تامین کیفری خواسته شده، نامتناسب باشد، نمی‌تواند تأمین متناسب اخذ کند.54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤26👍3😍1

29 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈12,100 views29 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Poll

انجام نیابت قضایی در حوزه قضایی بخش با ............ است.

  1. ۱) رئیس حوزه قضایی بخش44%
  2. ۲) رئیس دادگستری شهرستان7%
  3. ۳) رئیس یا دادرس علی البدل دادگاه بخش44%
  4. ۴) دادستان شهرستان5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤28😍1

29 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈14,300 views40 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Poll

دادگاههای ایران با وجود چه شرایطی می توانند نیابت قضایی ارجاع شده از سوی دادگاه های خارجی را قبول نمایند؟

  1. به شرط معامله متقابل16%
  2. نیابت دادگاه خارجی برخلاف موازین اسلامی نباشد.5%
  3. نیابت دادگاه خارج برخلاف نظم عمومی نباشد.5%
  4. هر سه گزینه73%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍24❤14💯1😍1

28 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 October 2026

برای خرید دوره های کاراموزی👇🏻 @law_adminlink

28 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC≈12,700 views27 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Poll

شرط نامشروع ، جزو شروط ........... آزمون ناشناس

  1. باطل و مبطل است40%
  2. باطل و غیر مبطل است49%
  3. باطل و‌مفسد عقد است8%
  4. هیچکدام4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤20😍5🥰2

28 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC≈12,000 views24 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Poll

یک شرکت ایرانی در یکی از شروط ضمن قرارداد با یک شرکت چینی، متعهد می شود که دعاوی حاصل از این قرارداد به یک سازمان داوری چینی ارجاع شود. وضعیت این شرط و قرارداد مزبور چگونه است؟

  1. در هر صورتی این شرط باطل است ولی مبطل قرارداد نخواهد بود34%
  2. ممکن است این شرط صحیح باشد26%
  3. این شرط مطلقا صحیح است30%
  4. در هر صورتی این شرط باطل و مبطل قراداد خواهد بود10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤20👏2🥰2

28 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Forwarded from @karbordirobinhood

برای خرید دوره های کاراموزی👇🏻 @law_adminlink

27 Sept 2026, 18:19 UTC≈4,700 viewsread 28 September 2026

برای خرید دوره های کاراموزی👇🏻 @law_adminlink

23 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC≈20,400 views63 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Poll

کدام‌گزینه صحیح نیست؟

  1. الف) عفو خصوصی نسبت به شخص محکوم علیه اعمال می شود10%
  2. ب) عفو عمومی نسبت به وصف مجرمانه عمل است11%
  3. ج) عفو خصوصی شامل حال متهمان یا سایر شرکای جرم می شود.49%
  4. د) عفو عمومی آثار تبعی مجازات را از بین می برد29%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤40🥰11👍7🔥2😍2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @testerobinhood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 28 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Sept 2026, 07:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,250 voters approx.

کدام گزینه در خصوص تامین کیفری در بحث نیابت قضایی، صحیح نیست؟

  1. بازپرس معطی نیابت می‌تواند در هنگام صدور قرار نیابت قضائی نوع تامین را معین کند.10%
  2. در موردی که تقاضای اخذ تامین نشده باشد، بازپرس مجری نیابت می‌تواند با نظر خود تامین مناسب اخذ کند.19%
  3. بازپرس معطی نیابت می‌تواند اختیار اخذ تامین و نوع آن را به بازپرس مجری نیابت، واگذار کند.17%
  4. اگر از نظر بازپرس مجری نیابت، تامین کیفری خواسته شده، نامتناسب باشد، نمی‌تواند تأمین متناسب اخذ کند.54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz3,050 voters approx.

دادگاههای ایران با وجود چه شرایطی می توانند نیابت قضایی ارجاع شده از سوی دادگاه های خارجی را قبول نمایند؟

  1. به شرط معامله متقابل16%
  2. نیابت دادگاه خارجی برخلاف موازین اسلامی نباشد.5%
  3. نیابت دادگاه خارج برخلاف نظم عمومی نباشد.5%
  4. هر سه گزینه73%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz3,050 voters approx.

انجام نیابت قضایی در حوزه قضایی بخش با ............ است.

  1. ۱) رئیس حوزه قضایی بخش44%
  2. ۲) رئیس دادگستری شهرستان7%
  3. ۳) رئیس یا دادرس علی البدل دادگاه بخش44%
  4. ۴) دادستان شهرستان5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,430 voters approx.

یک شرکت ایرانی در یکی از شروط ضمن قرارداد با یک شرکت چینی، متعهد می شود که دعاوی حاصل از این قرارداد به یک سازمان داوری چینی ارجاع شود. وضعیت این شرط و قرارداد مزبور چگونه است؟

  1. در هر صورتی این شرط باطل است ولی مبطل قرارداد نخواهد بود34%
  2. ممکن است این شرط صحیح باشد26%
  3. این شرط مطلقا صحیح است30%
  4. در هر صورتی این شرط باطل و مبطل قراداد خواهد بود10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz3,360 voters approx.

شرط نامشروع ، جزو شروط ........... آزمون ناشناس

  1. باطل و مبطل است40%
  2. باطل و غیر مبطل است49%
  3. باطل و‌مفسد عقد است8%
  4. هیچکدام4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz4,290 voters approx.

کدام‌گزینه صحیح نیست؟

  1. الف) عفو خصوصی نسبت به شخص محکوم علیه اعمال می شود10%
  2. ب) عفو عمومی نسبت به وصف مجرمانه عمل است11%
  3. ج) عفو خصوصی شامل حال متهمان یا سایر شرکای جرم می شود.49%
  4. د) عفو عمومی آثار تبعی مجازات را از بین می برد29%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 155,347
#1
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 116,941
#2
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,760
#3
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,668
#4
آزمون برتر|وکالت،قضاوت
@Azmone_bartar · 21,005
#5
آکادمی جزا وکیفری سهامی
@jazakefari · 18,585
#6
تست آ.د.کیفری آنلاین
@a_dadrasi_keyfari99 · 8,814
#7
آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری
@drseyedjafari · 57,751
#8
کانال جدید سردفتری ۱۴۰۲
@sardaftari_azmon · 4,297
#9
تست قوانین خاص🌸
@Ghavanin_khas · 9,985
#10
📥 فیلم حقوقی آنلاین💡
@arshive_hoqoqi_online · 17,365
#11
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 108,010
#12
نکته و تست قوانین خاص
@ghavaninekhas · 14,697
#13
فایل حقوقی کاربردی رابین هود
@karbordi_robinhood · 4,478
#14
چکیده ی آرای وحدت رویه
@arayevahdat · 11,923
#15
فایل حقوقی رابین هود
@voicelaw5040 · 13,278
#16
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 62,771
#17
خبر رسان دادآفرین
@dadafarin_news · 14,683
#18
تدریس حقوق مدنی دکترشعبانی و دکتر زارعی
@motoonfeghhh · 4,046
#19
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,473
#20
فایل و ویس حقوقی حقوق بان
@hoghoghBann · 11,227
#21
🌸کانال صوت تدریس متون فقه وکالت و تست🌸
@motoonghh · 1,177
#22
شوق وکالت_مشاور آزمون وکالت
@shoghe_vekalaat · 7,384
#23
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,743
#24
جزوه سرا (حقوق)
@buasr · 17,994
#25
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,940
#26
متون فقه - اصول فقه آزمون وکالت
@motoon_osool · 10,866
#27
جستاری در حقوق خصوصی
@privatelawiran1 · 1,557
#28
خبر رسان چتر اهواز
@chatre_ahvaz · 4,324
#29
فایل و کتاب های حقوقی (حقوق بوک) 🇮🇷
@hoghooghboook · 45,575
#30
hoghough_khososi
@hoghough_khososi · 112
#31
اخبار آزمون های حقوقی
@newsazmoon · 5,243
#32
موسسه مطالعات حقوقی دکتر محمدحسین شهبازی
@dr_shahbazi · 4,993
#33
فایل حقوقی ایران (رابین هود )
@iranvoicelaw · 5,733
#34
احمد غفوری کانال اصلی
@ghafooriasli · 58,038
#35
کانال حقوقی دکتر جعفری افتخار(آشنایی با رویه های مختلف قضایی)
@majidjafarieftekhar · 14,720
#36
فایل حقوقی زاگرس
@zagroslaww · 28,632
#37
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 82,501
#38
✧⋄𝑨𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒊 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓!
@alikhani_star · 374
#39
مدنی و آدم عبدغیور(کانال اول)
@abdeghayour1403 · 7,625
#40
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,636
#41
پادكست دارالوكاله
@darlawgroup777 · 2,248
#42
آزمون وکالت، قضاوت، سردفتری
@lawtadris · 16,639
#43
اجتماع بزرگ حقوق خواندگان
@tohidlo72 · 8,375
#44
سردفتری ۱۴۰۳
@sardaftari1403m · 495 (as read 1 September 2026)
#45
FazeliAcademy
@Fazeliacademy · 13,808
#46
English.Farahani.Ariasalis
@AriasalisFarahani · 737
#47
مدنی جعبه سیاه زارعی خودم
@icucjvci · 2,014
#48
🤵‍♂️مجمع وکلا 🤵‍♀️
@azmonkadeh_hoghogh · 8,603
#49
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,436
#50
اظهــار الحــق
@ezhar_al_haq · 463
#51
رحا (رسانه حقوقی ایران)
@rahahoquqi · 8,723
#52
اصول‌ فقه تحلیلی (استاد بنی صدر)
@osool583 · 6,418
#53
جـَــزا نوبهار طهرآنی
@tadris_jaza · 1,667
#54
مدنی جعبه سیاه مهدی زارعی
@madani_asan · 5,036
#55
معرفی اساتید | حقوق تهران مرکز
@moarefi_ostad_tmlaw · 534
#56
حقوق به زبان ساده ⁦🇮🇷⁩laweasy@
@laweasy · 11,093
#57
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 40,392
#58
باشگاه وکلای مشاهیر
@mashahirlawyers · 31,123
#59
موسسه آموزش عالی آزادچتردانش
@chatredanesh · 13,792
#60
آموزش آزمون های حقوقی( نکته وتست) موسسه عادلان
@hoghoghvekalatt · 17,138
#61
تدریس جزا و کیفری دکتر کامفرو نوبهار
@tadrisekifari · 5,530
#62
موسسه دیوان حق
@divanehagh · 3,978
#63
فانتزی لیگ ایران | PG Fantasy
@PersianGulf_Fantasy · 2,557
#64
Capital Fantasy | UCL
@Capital_Fantasy · 1,540
#65
FPL.iran
@Fpliran · 1,103
#66
فوتبال فانتزی اسپشالیست | FPL SPECIALISTS
@FantasyPremierLeague_Iran · 2,934
#67
🌿شبگرد اورموی (دانشفروز)
@shabgardurmavi · 342
#68
دپارتمان حقوق کاربردی چتردانش
@chatredanesh_vakil · 2,741
#69
❤♥️ بردین کوه ❤♥️
@bordon_koh · 573
#70
" justice "
@Justice_in_true_crime · 1,137
#71
فانتزی لیگ برتر انگلیس | FPL
@FPL_Live · 3,017
#72
دیگر دچارت نیستم.
@HeS_NiiS · 7,838
#73
Kiamoo_b
@kaimoo_b · 1,579
#74
What If ?
@WhatIfAi7 · 1,148
#75
کانال دات کوین DTC/Dotcoin
@Dot_coin028 · 137
#76
کانال رسمی اسكودا
@skoodaa · 12,709
#77

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,668
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 40,392
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال تست رابین هود” (@testerobinhood), 84,714 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/testerobinhood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.