Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -664. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,088–28,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:21
27,262
-30
17 Sept 2026, 03:41
27,292
-22
15 Sept 2026, 03:41
27,314
+117
13 Sept 2026, 16:20
27,197
-30
11 Sept 2026, 21:59
27,227
-35
9 Sept 2026, 13:58
27,262
-54
6 Sept 2026, 05:56
27,316
-30
4 Sept 2026, 03:17
27,346
-33
2 Sept 2026, 15:36
27,379
-37
1 Sept 2026, 13:34
27,416
-29
31 Aug 2026, 15:53
27,445
-22
30 Aug 2026, 17:07
27,467
-23
29 Aug 2026, 17:34
27,490
-30
28 Aug 2026, 15:38
27,520
-21
27 Aug 2026, 15:03
27,541
-20
26 Aug 2026, 13:27
27,561
-18
25 Aug 2026, 10:34
27,579
-20
24 Aug 2026, 14:04
27,599
-40
22 Aug 2026, 18:17
27,639
+72
21 Aug 2026, 10:25
27,567
first reading
Engagement
335 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 27,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,960
133 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
135
of 335 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
335 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
659,981
Reactions total
22,930
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,250
Videos
≈124
Links
≈788
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56,781 reactions across 333 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
45,564
80.2%
👍
2,649
4.67%
👏
1,705
3.00%
🙏
1,533
2.70%
😍
1,128
1.99%
🔥
1,030
1.81%
❤🔥
842
1.48%
😱
736
1.30%
🤔
332
0.585%
🤯
248
0.437%
😐
174
0.306%
🤷♂
138
0.243%
😢
115
0.203%
👌
100
0.176%
😭
90
0.159%
👀
79
0.139%
😘
68
0.12%
😎
57
0.1%
🐳
42
0.074%
💯
40
0.07%
11 further kinds
111
0.195%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 333 of the 335 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 335 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 نهنگها در حال خرید UNI$؟
#uni:$8.9
در مجموع ۳ کیف پول تازهساختهشده اخیرا ۷۸۲,۱۳۰ واحد UNI به ارزش حدود ۶.۹۷ میلیون دلار اکومولیت کردهاند.
🔹 کیف پول 0xbD9C تعداد ۱۳۰,۰۰۰ UNI به ارزش ۱.۱۴ میلیون دلار از Galaxy Digital دریافت کرده است.
🔹 کیف پول 0xf415 نیز ۲۲۱,۹۵۵ UNI به ارزش ۱.۹۹ میلیون دلار را از Bybit و OKX خارج کرده است.
🔹 کیف پول 0x9681 طی ۳ روز گذشته ۴۳۰,۱۷۴ UNI به ارزش ۳.۸۴ میلیون دلار از Binance و Gate…
🚨 خبر فوری | BCH و UNI در مسیر معاملات آتی CME
⚡️بیتکوینکش (BCH) به ۳۰۰ دلار و یونیسواپ (UNI) به بالای ۹ دلار رسیدند.
بورس CME اعلام کرده قراردادهای آتی استاندارد و Micro این دو ارزدیجیتال، در صورت تأیید نهادهای نظارتی، از ۱۹ اکتبر راهاندازی خواهند شد.
این قراردادها امکان معامله ۲۴ ساعته و قانونگذاریشده BCH و UNI را بدون نیاز به نگهداری مستقیم توکن فراهم میکنند.
@Holders_News
🚨 خبــــر فــــوری | پیشنهاد ایران برای بازگشایی تنگه هرمز
در پی انتشار این خبر، قیمت نفت Brent نیز به زیر ۱۰۰ دلار در هر بشکه کاهش یافت.
🇮🇷 به نقل از رسانه های خبری، ایران پیشنهاد داده است در صورت آغاز روند لغو محاصره بنادر از سوی آمریکا و توقف عملیات نظامی، تنگه هرمز را ظرف ۷ روز بازگشایی کند.
#هولدرزنیوز مرجع تخصصی اخبار حوزه کریپتوکارنسی
@Holders_News
😮⚡️ سود 57 درصدی SUI از محدوده حمایتی (57% سود اسپات)
📈 آپدیت تحلیل SUI | تایم 3 روزه
توکن SUI در صورت شکست مقاومت مهم 1.42 دلار، میتواند به سمت اهداف مشخص شده حرکت کند.
❗️ قیمت لحظه تحلیل: 1 دلار
🎯 تارگتها: 1.8 | 2.18 | 2.6 | 3.25 دلار
📌 مناسب برای:
• اسپات بلندمدت و پلهای
📣 توجه: شما درحال استفاده رایگان از این کانال هستید.
⚠️ این تحلیل صرفاً دیدگاه تکنیکال است و توصیه مالی یا سرمایهگذاری محسوب نمیشود.
@H…
وقتی فقط در یک روز نزدیک به ۱ میلیارد دلار سرمایه، وارد ETFهای بیتکوین آمریکا میشود...🔥🔥
این جریان سرمایه در حالی اتفاق افتاد که بیتکوین در معاملات دوشنبه تا محدوده 87 هزار دلار صعود کرد.
📌 در ۲۱ سپتامبر ETFهای اسپات بیتکوین آمریکا مجموعاً ۹۹۹ میلیون دلار ورود سرمایه ثبت کردند؛ در صدر هم BlackRock با ETF خود یعنی IBIT قرار داشت که ۳۸۱ میلیون دلار جذب کرد.
در کنار بیتکوین، ETFهای اسپات اتریوم نیز حدود ۲۷۰ میلیو…
🔥 فوری | سیگنال مهم آلتکوین سیزن؟
دوهفته پیش، درست قبل شروع موج صعودی، ما در کانال پیش بینی و اطلاع رسانی کردیم (منبع)
حال امروز بر اساس دادههای Glassnode و طبق تصویر فوق ، سیگنال چرخه بازار از بیت کوین سیزن به آلتکوین سیزن تغییر کرد.
#هولدرزنیوز مرجع تخصصی اخبار حوزه کریپتوکارنسی
@Holders_News
🚨 بازگشت شاخص ترس و طمع به محدوده طمع شدید
شاخص Crypto Fear & Greed با جهش به ۷۸ وارد محدوده Extreme Greed (طمع شدید) شد؛ این نخستین بار در ماه جاری است که شاخص به این محدوده میرسد.
این افزایش همزمان با رشد اخیر بازار کریپتو و تقویت احساسات مثبت میان معاملهگران رخ داده است.
#هولدرزنیوز مرجع تخصصی اخبار حوزه کریپتوکارنسی
@Holders_News
📊 تحلیل بیتکوین BTC | هفتگی
بیتکوین پس از رشد اخیر، اکنون حوالی 86,027 دلار قرار دارد و به مقاومت مهم 90,000 تا 98,000 دلار نزدیک شده است. این محدوده میتواند بیتکوین را با افزایش فشار فروش و یک واکنش اصلاحی مواجه کند.
❗️قیمت لحظه تحلیل: 86,027 دلار
🔹 حمایت خیلی مهم: 75,000 تا 80,500 دلار
🔸 مقاومت مهم: 90,000 تا 98,000 دلار
این محدوده میتواند یکی از مهمترین موانع ادامه حرکت صعودی بیتکوین باشد و احتمال افزایش عرض…
❤183❤🔥19🙏15🔥10😍7👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 335 posts we hold for @Holders_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Holders_News edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
مارکت کپ بازار ارزهای دیجیتال در ماه آگوست ۲۰٪ رشد کرد و از ۲.۲ تریلیون دلار به ۲.۷ تریلیون دلار رسید.
آیا در ماه سپتامبر هم شاهد رشد مشابهی خواهیم بود؟
بله46%
خیر54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❗️حالا سؤال اینجاست:
بااین ریزش سنگین در یکسال اخیر،آیا XRP توان بازگشت به ATH خود را دارد ؟
✅ بله59%
❌خیر41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 335 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sina Estavi | سینا استوی @sinaestavi · 478,816 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Mohammad Hoseini @hoseinifinance_com · 30,314 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
BitDate | بیت دیت @BitDate · 55,552 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
علی نوئین| اخبار جنگ @agent_ali · 52,290 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
حامد پیروی|تحلیل طلا،کریپتو،اقتصاد سیاسی @Hamedpeiravi · 70,613 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Amir_ramzali @amir_ramzali · 113,230 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
AutoTCrypto @autotcrypto · 22,149 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Daraei360 تحلیل اقتصاد @doctordaraei · 35,676 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
امیر رمزعلی ( بازارهای مالی ) @ramzali_sc · 123,821 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
کانال فرمانده کریپتو |کانال2 @commanderBTC · 24,705 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
MatinMental @matinmentalofficial · 46,016 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
پلتفرم اکوکوچ | EcoCoach @ecocoach_net · 24,119 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
کریپتولند - سیگنال کریپتو - آموزش ارز دیجیتال @CryptoLand · 49,080 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
MahanEconomy @mahaneconomy · 385,809 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil @mohsen_tahlil · 37,870 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HOLDERS|اخبارفوری ارزدیجیتال” (@Holders_News), 27,262 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Holders_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.